Subramanian Tejas, Sarpong Stephane Owusu, Simon Chad Z, Uzzo Robert, Dekhne Mihir, Kaidi Austin C, Kazarian Gregory S, Zhao Eric, Musharbash Farah, Colon Luis Felipe, Ehrlich Adin, Araghi Kasra, Song Junho, Asada Tomoyuki, Shahi Pratyush, Amen Troy B, Morse Kyle, Lovecchio Francis C, Dowdell James, Qureshi Sheeraz, Iyer Sravisht
Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005446.
Single-center, survey-based study.
This study aims to assess patient experiences in ambulatory lumbar spine surgery, with a focus on their expectations and preferences regarding discharge disposition, as well as the impact of discharge timing and alignment with patient preferences on satisfaction and early recovery outcomes.
While the safety and efficacy of ambulatory spine surgery have been well established, patient perceptions and experiences with these accelerated recovery pathways remain underexplored.
A custom survey, designed by the authors, assessed patient experiences, preferences, and satisfaction related to discharge disposition. Respondents were asked to reflect on their surgical experience, focusing on their preferences for discharge timing and the reasons behind those preferences. The survey was administered to adult patients who underwent primary single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) or laminectomy (MI-Lami) and were discharged either on the same day of surgery (SDD) or after an overnight hospital stay (OVN). Patient preferences were qualitatively analyzed to identify recurring themes, while their postoperative night one experience was quantitatively scored across multiple domains, including sleep quality, comfort, hygiene management, and overall satisfaction. These data were then used to explore the relationship between discharge timing, and preference concordance.
A total of 227 responses were collected, with 64 (28.2%) undergoing MI-TLIF and 163 (71.8%) undergoing MI-Lami. Of these, 116 (51.1%) were discharged on the same day (SDD) and 111 (48.9%) had an overnight stay (OVN). While 36% preferred SDD and 49.8% preferred OVN, 56.9% reported feeling ready for same-day discharge. Qualitative analysis revealed that SDD preferences were driven by comfort at home, better sleep, and avoiding hospital inconveniences. Conversely, OVN preferences emphasized medical support, pain control, and logistical ease. Patients discharged the same day reported better care, sleep, hygiene, and comfort (P<0.05 for all). Those discharged in concordance with their preferences reported significantly lower rates of feeling discharged prematurely (3.4% vs. 32.3%; P<0.001) and superior outcomes across multiple domains, including pain control, comfort, and reduced burden on families (P<0.05 for all).
SDD patients reported improved postoperative experiences, including sleep and satisfaction. Aligning discharge timing with patient preferences further enhanced outcomes, emphasizing the importance of patient-centered discharge planning in spine surgery.
单中心、基于调查的研究。
本研究旨在评估门诊腰椎手术患者的体验,重点关注他们对出院处置的期望和偏好,以及出院时间与患者偏好的匹配对满意度和早期恢复结果的影响。
虽然门诊脊柱手术的安全性和有效性已得到充分证实,但患者对这些加速康复路径的认知和体验仍未得到充分探索。
作者设计了一项定制调查,评估患者与出院处置相关的体验、偏好和满意度。受访者被要求回顾他们的手术经历,重点是他们对出院时间的偏好以及这些偏好背后的原因。该调查针对接受初次单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)或椎板切除术(MI-Lami)的成年患者进行,这些患者在手术当天(SDD)或住院一晚后(OVN)出院。对患者的偏好进行定性分析以确定反复出现的主题,同时对他们术后第一晚的体验在多个领域进行定量评分,包括睡眠质量、舒适度、卫生管理和总体满意度。然后使用这些数据来探讨出院时间与偏好一致性之间的关系。
共收集到227份回复,其中64例(28.2%)接受了MI-TLIF手术,163例(71.8%)接受了MI-Lami手术。其中,116例(51.1%)在同一天出院(SDD),111例(48.9%)住院一晚。虽然36%的患者更喜欢SDD,49.8%的患者更喜欢OVN,但56.9%的患者表示感觉已准备好当天出院。定性分析表明,选择SDD的偏好是由在家中的舒适度、更好的睡眠以及避免医院不便因素驱动的。相反,选择OVN的偏好则强调医疗支持、疼痛控制和后勤便利。当天出院的患者报告在护理、睡眠、卫生和舒适度方面更好(所有P<0.05)。与他们的偏好一致出院的患者报告过早出院的感觉发生率显著更低(3.4%对32.3%;P<0.001),并且在多个领域的结果更好,包括疼痛控制、舒适度和减轻家庭负担(所有P<0.05)。
SDD患者报告术后体验有所改善,包括睡眠和满意度。使出院时间与患者偏好相匹配进一步提高了结果,强调了脊柱手术中以患者为中心的出院计划的重要性。