Farah Rola, Meri Raya, Horowitz-Kraus Tzipi
Educational Neuroimaging Group, Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Brain Connect. 2025 Aug;15(6):229-242. doi: 10.1177/21580014251358735. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
Executive functions (EF) are cognitive processes supporting language and reading. Children with dyslexia show reading difficulties primarily due to phonological processing, with additional reported deficits in EF. This study aimed to determine the differences in EF involvement during written (reading) versus oral language (narrative) comprehension in children with dyslexia versus typical readers neurobiologically and behaviorally. Reading, language, and EF behavioral measures and functional MRI data were collected from 55 typical readers (TR) and 65 English-speaking children with dyslexia ages 8-12 years during reading and narrative comprehension tasks. Differences within and between functional connectivity of EF and attention networks were calculated and then compared between groups and tasks using Fisher Z-transformation. Children with dyslexia showed higher functional connectivity values in EF and attention networks in both reading and narrative comprehension tasks, whereas TR showed higher functional connectivity in narrative versus reading comprehension. Within groups, analysis showed higher functional connectivity within dorsal attention functional brain network (DAN) and between DAN-fronto-parietal (FP), cingulo-opercular (CO)-FP, and ventral attention functional brain network (VAN)-DAN, in the reading versus narrative comprehension task in the dyslexia group. TR showed higher functional connectivity within VAN, and between VAN-FP in the narrative compared to the reading comprehension tasks. Children with dyslexia seem to greatly utilize EF and attention-related networks in narrative and reading comprehension tasks and demonstrate a greater network integration for the written versus oral comprehension task. TR, however, utilize these networks only during oral comprehension, which may point to a greater reliance on memory and processing effort in the absence of written information.
执行功能(EF)是支持语言和阅读的认知过程。诵读困难儿童主要由于语音处理方面的问题而存在阅读困难,此外还有报道称其在执行功能方面存在缺陷。本研究旨在从神经生物学和行为学角度确定诵读困难儿童与正常阅读儿童在书面(阅读)与口头语言(叙事)理解过程中执行功能参与情况的差异。在阅读和叙事理解任务期间,收集了55名正常阅读者(TR)和65名8至12岁讲英语的诵读困难儿童的阅读、语言和执行功能行为测量数据以及功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据。计算了执行功能和注意力网络功能连接的组内和组间差异,然后使用Fisher Z变换在组和任务之间进行比较。诵读困难儿童在阅读和叙事理解任务中的执行功能和注意力网络中均表现出较高的功能连接值,而正常阅读者在叙事理解与阅读理解中表现出更高的功能连接。在组内分析中,诵读困难组在阅读与叙事理解任务中,背侧注意力功能脑网络(DAN)内以及DAN与额顶叶(FP)、扣带- opercular(CO)-FP和腹侧注意力功能脑网络(VAN)-DAN之间表现出更高的功能连接。与阅读理解任务相比,正常阅读者在叙事任务中VAN内以及VAN与FP之间表现出更高的功能连接。诵读困难儿童在叙事和阅读理解任务中似乎大量利用执行功能和与注意力相关的网络,并且在书面与口头理解任务中表现出更强的网络整合。然而,正常阅读者仅在口头理解过程中利用这些网络,这可能表明在没有书面信息的情况下对记忆和处理努力的更大依赖。