Michalak Margaret M, Suchomel Timothy J, Greer Beau K, Long Steven A, Taber Christober B
Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, Connecticut; and.
Department of Exercise Science, Carroll University, Waukesha, Wisconsin.
J Strength Cond Res. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005176.
Michalak, MM, Suchomel, TJ, Greer, BK, Long, SA, and Taber, CB. The effects of maximal and supramaximal accentuated eccentric loading on the barbell bench press. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-The effects of accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) were examined on barbell bench press mean and peak performance metrics across various concentric and eccentric loads. Eighteen strength-trained men (age: 23.8 ± 4.0 years; height: 180.2 ± 5.7 cm; body mass: 95.8 ± 6.6 kg, training age: 2 ± 14 years, bench press 1 repetition maximum (1RM): 120.7 ± 17.0 kg, relative strength ratio: 1.27 ± 0.17 kg·kg-1) participated. Subjects completed repetitions using concentric loads ranging from 40 to 80% 1RM in 10% increments during each experimental session. The AEL protocols used 100% (AEL100) or 110% (AEL110) of concentric 1RM during the eccentric action, and the eccentric load remained the same as the concentric load during the traditional loading session. An analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to analyze the effects of loading condition and concentric load (3 × 5) on concentric power, force, velocity, and eccentric repetition duration. Greater concentric force outputs were observed at 60-80% loads compared with 40% (p < 0.05). In addition, 40% loading elicited greater concentric velocities compared with the 60-80% loads (p < 0.05). The magnitude of the concentric load showed a greater change in performance metrics than the loading condition, alluding to AEL protocols having too great an effect on movement mechanics to result in consistent performance enhancements. Thus, it seems the efficacy of AEL at various concentric loads depends on the magnitude of eccentric loading and the relative strength index of subjects.
米哈拉克,MM,苏乔梅尔,TJ,格里尔,BK,朗,SA,以及泰伯,CB。最大和超最大加重离心负荷对杠铃卧推的影响。《力量与体能研究杂志》XX(X):000 - 000,2025年 - 研究了加重离心负荷(AEL)对杠铃卧推在各种向心和离心负荷下的平均和峰值表现指标的影响。18名经过力量训练的男性(年龄:23.8±4.0岁;身高:180.2±5.7厘米;体重:95.8±6.6千克,训练年限:2±1.4年,卧推1次最大重复量(1RM):120.7±17.0千克,相对力量比:1.27±0.17千克·千克⁻¹)参与了研究。在每个实验环节中,受试者使用从40%到80% 1RM的向心负荷,以10%的增量完成重复动作。AEL方案在离心动作期间使用向心1RM的100%(AEL100)或110%(AEL110),并且在传统负荷环节中,离心负荷与向心负荷保持相同。采用重复测量方差分析来分析负荷条件和向心负荷(3×5)对向心功率、力量、速度和离心重复持续时间的影响。与40%负荷相比,在60% - 80%负荷下观察到更大的向心力量输出(p < 0.05)。此外,与60% - 80%负荷相比,40%负荷引发了更大的向心速度(p < 0.05)。向心负荷的大小在表现指标上显示出比负荷条件更大的变化,这表明AEL方案对运动力学的影响过大,以至于无法带来一致的表现提升。因此,似乎AEL在各种向心负荷下的功效取决于离心负荷的大小和受试者的相对力量指数。