Goodin Dylan A, Miller Hunter A, Yin Xinmin, Zhang Xiang, Chen Joseph, Williams Brian J, Frieboes Hermann B
1Departments of Bioengineering.
2Chemistry.
J Neurosurg. 2025 Jul 11:1-12. doi: 10.3171/2025.3.JNS242330.
Spatial metabolic differences recently found in glioblastoma (GBM) have been linked to the infiltrating nature of the tumor edge tissue, which is mostly unresectable, and to the tumor core tissue, which resists therapy. The impact of metabolic dysregulation in core and edge GBM tissues on patient survival remains unclear. This study evaluated metabolites obtained from core and edge GBM tissues at the time of resection as biomarkers to risk stratify patients in terms of overall survival (OS).
Paired core and edge tumor samples from 27 patients with glioma obtained after craniotomy were evaluated postsurgery with high-resolution 2D liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry, and metabolomic data for grade IV samples (n = 21) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models. GBM patients were stratified into low- and high-risk groups via a linear equation based on log-transformed signal intensities of key metabolites. Risk scores were generated by summing the product of weights and metabolite signal intensities for each patient's tumor. Weights for significant metabolites were calculated by scaling the univariable Cox proportional hazard ratio for each metabolite by the standard error. For risk score validation, OS events were predicted using an Extreme Gradient Boosting model with Linear Booster (XGBL).
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis identified 6 significant metabolites in core tissue and 5 in edge tissue, respectively. Key metabolites in core and edge tissue identified through univariable Cox regression analyses combined with covariates were used to generate multivariable Cox regression models, with edge metabolites remaining significant after correction by patient sex and age at resection. Risk scores based on either 4 core or 11 edge metabolites, or the combination of both, with covariates, generated multivariable Cox regression models significantly associated with OS. Risk score derived from core metabolites remained significant after correction by covariates and was validated with XGBL classification model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.876).
OS of patients with GBM can be stratified based on metabolomic differences between core and edge tumor tissues.
最近在胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)中发现的空间代谢差异与肿瘤边缘组织(大多无法切除)的浸润性以及抵抗治疗的肿瘤核心组织有关。GBM核心和边缘组织中代谢失调对患者生存的影响尚不清楚。本研究评估了切除时从GBM核心和边缘组织获得的代谢物作为生物标志物,以便根据总生存期(OS)对患者进行风险分层。
对27例开颅术后获得的胶质瘤患者的配对核心和边缘肿瘤样本进行术后高分辨率二维液相色谱-质谱/质谱评估,对IV级样本(n = 21)的代谢组学数据进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析以及单变量和多变量Cox比例风险回归模型分析。通过基于关键代谢物对数转换信号强度的线性方程,将GBM患者分为低风险和高风险组。通过将每个患者肿瘤的权重与代谢物信号强度的乘积相加来生成风险评分。通过将每个代谢物的单变量Cox比例风险比除以标准误差来计算显著代谢物的权重。为了进行风险评分验证,使用带有线性增强器的极端梯度提升模型(XGBL)预测OS事件。
Kaplan-Meier生存分析分别在核心组织中鉴定出6种显著代谢物,在边缘组织中鉴定出5种。通过单变量Cox回归分析结合协变量确定的核心和边缘组织中的关键代谢物用于生成多变量Cox回归模型,边缘代谢物在根据患者切除时的性别和年龄进行校正后仍然显著。基于4种核心代谢物或11种边缘代谢物或两者结合并结合协变量的风险评分生成了与OS显著相关的多变量Cox回归模型。核心代谢物衍生的风险评分在经协变量校正后仍然显著,并通过XGBL分类模型进行了验证(受试者工作特征曲线下面积 = 0.876)。
GBM患者的OS可以根据肿瘤核心和边缘组织之间的代谢组学差异进行分层。