• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Assessing Reporting Guidelines and Trial Registration in Pediatric Journals: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

作者信息

Gardner Taylor, Fernandez Todd, Cox Katherine, Smith Caleb, Nees Danya, Hughes Griffin, Vassar Matt

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK.

Department of Medical Education, Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2025 Nov;286:114714. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114714. Epub 2025 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114714
PMID:40645284
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of reporting guideline and clinical trial registration requirements in the "instructions for authors" pages of pediatric journals since a previously completed 2010 publication.

STUDY DESIGN

This cross-sectional study analyzed 100 peer-reviewed pediatric journals identified through the 2021 Scopus CiteSource tool. Two investigators independently reviewed journals' "instructions for authors" pages on December 10, 2023, for references to the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, specific reporting guidelines, and clinical trial registration requirements.

RESULTS

Among the 100 journals analyzed, 33% (33/100) did not reference any specific reporting guidelines. Of the 98 journals assessed for clinical trial registration, 43% (42/98) failed to mention study registration. EQUATOR Network guidelines were mentioned by 39% (39/100) of journals, and ICMJE was referenced by 68% (68/100). CONSORT and PRISMA were the most cited reporting guidelines, mentioned by 52% (51/98) and 41% (41/100) of journals, respectively. In contrast, 95% (94/99) of journals did not reference meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology, and 99% (99/100) omitted quality of reporting of meta-analyses.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric journals inadequately endorse reporting guidelines and clinical trial registration in their author instructions. These tools are critical for improving research quality, transparency, and reproducibility. Pediatric journals should strengthen publication policies to mandate these practices. Further research is needed to explore barriers and incentives for adoption to enhance integration into clinical research.

摘要

相似文献

1
Assessing Reporting Guidelines and Trial Registration in Pediatric Journals: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
J Pediatr. 2025 Nov;286:114714. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114714. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
2
Endorsement of reporting guidelines and clinical trial registration by tropical medicine and infectious disease journals: A cross-sectional study.热带医学与传染病期刊对报告指南和临床试验注册的认可:一项横断面研究。
Trop Med Int Health. 2025 Jul;30(7):580-587. doi: 10.1111/tmi.14127. Epub 2025 May 14.
3
Hematology journals do not sufficiently adhere to reporting guidelines: a systematic review.血液学期刊未充分遵循报告指南:系统评价。
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Apr;15(4):608-617. doi: 10.1111/jth.13637. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
4
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.试验报告的统一标准(CONSORT)以及医学期刊上发表的随机对照试验(RCT)的报告完整性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2.
5
Do peer reviewers comment on reporting items as instructed by the journal? A secondary analysis of two randomized trials.同行评审员是否按照期刊的要求对报告项目进行评论?两项随机试验的二次分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May 8;183:111818. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111818.
6
Endorsement of reporting guidelines and trial registration remains inconsistent across top endocrinology journals.顶尖内分泌学期刊对报告指南和试验注册的认可情况仍然不一致。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Aug;184:111835. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111835. Epub 2025 May 19.
7
Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review.系统评价:健康研究报告完整性与期刊对报告指南认可的关系。
BMJ. 2014 Jun 25;348:g3804. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3804.
8
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review.随机对照试验报告质量评估:双相情感障碍药物治疗的系统综述。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;72(9):1214-21. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10r06166yel. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
9
Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: a systematic review.提高韩国传统医学期刊随机对照试验报告质量的认可:一项系统评价
Trials. 2014 Nov 5;15:429. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-429.
10
A Cross-Sectional Study on the Endorsement of Reporting Guidelines by Journals in Geriatrics and Gerontology.老年医学与老年学领域期刊对报告指南认可情况的横断面研究
Gerontology. 2025 Jun 19:1-17. doi: 10.1159/000546516.