Hernández-Caicedo A J, Santamaria-García J C, Villa-Bandera J H, Salgado-Leal C, Blanco-Granados C T, Rivero-Centeno M A
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Hospital Militar Central. Bogotá, Colombia.
Hospital Militar Central. Bogotá, Colombia.
Acta Ortop Mex. 2025 May-Jun;39(3):139-144.
high-energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures involve extensive soft tissue damage and present significant postoperative risks, such as infections, venous thrombosis, and compartment syndrome. There is controversy regarding whether to manage these fractures with definitive surgical intervention or by using an external fixator as part of a staged management approach.
this was a retrospective cohort study. Twenty-two patients with complex tibial plateau fractures were analyzed during the study period. Patients were assigned to three groups based on surgical management: group A (external fixator followed by definitive osteosynthesis), group B (definitive external fixator), and group C (definitive osteosynthesis). Sociodemographic variables, fracture type, and postoperative complications were evaluated, with statistical analysis used to compare outcomes.
most fractures were closed and resulted from motor vehicle accidents. Surgery was performed at an average of 7.86 days, with definitive osteosynthesis being the most common treatment (54.5%). Complications such as thromboembolism and infections were reported, but there were no immediate postoperative complications. Fracture consolidation was achieved in 95% of patients, with an average range of motion of 102 degrees, with no significant differences between treatments.
Schatzker V and VI fractures present significant challenges. Although fixation methods have their advantages and disadvantages, functional outcomes are positive with good consolidation and recovery of mobility.
the choice of fixation type and timing of intervention should be based on a comprehensive evaluation of the patient and the fracture, considering potential complications to ensure adequate rehabilitation.
高能双髁胫骨平台骨折会导致广泛的软组织损伤,并带来显著的术后风险,如感染、静脉血栓形成和骨筋膜室综合征。对于这些骨折是采用确定性手术干预还是使用外固定器作为分期治疗方法的一部分进行处理,目前存在争议。
这是一项回顾性队列研究。在研究期间对22例复杂胫骨平台骨折患者进行了分析。根据手术治疗方式将患者分为三组:A组(外固定器随后进行确定性骨固定)、B组(确定性外固定)和C组(确定性骨固定)。评估了社会人口统计学变量、骨折类型和术后并发症,并采用统计分析比较结果。
大多数骨折为闭合性骨折,由机动车事故导致。平均在7.86天进行手术,确定性骨固定是最常见的治疗方式(54.5%)。报告了血栓栓塞和感染等并发症,但术后无即刻并发症。95%的患者实现了骨折愈合,平均活动范围为102度,各治疗组之间无显著差异。
Schatzker V型和VI型骨折带来了重大挑战。尽管固定方法各有优缺点,但功能结果良好,骨折愈合良好且活动能力得以恢复。
固定类型的选择和干预时机应基于对患者和骨折的全面评估,同时考虑潜在并发症以确保充分康复。