Suppr超能文献

前牙美学区微型螺钉植入的最佳部位:针对不同垂直骨面型的锥形束CT研究

Optimal sites for miniscrew insertion in anterior aesthetic region: a CBCT study for different vertical skeletal patterns.

作者信息

Feng Xiaoyan, Weng Luxi, Li Xin, Shen Yiyang, Lin Jun

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):1148. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06538-6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to measure the root distance, bone thickness and bone density in maxillary anterior region with different vertical skeletal patterns based on CBCT data, and provide reference for the optimal site for miniscrew insertion in anterior aesthetic region.

METHODS

60 adult patients(18-29years) with skeletal Class I angle (ANB angle = 2° ± 2°) were selected and divided into three groups (n = 20) according to vertical skeletal patterns.The population was divided into 3 groups according to the measured SN-GoGn angle: hypodivergent (SN-GoGn < 27°), average (27°≤ SN-GoGn ≤ 37°) and hyperdivergent (SN-GoGn > 37°) groups. The CBCT data was processed and measured by Dolphin Imaging and Mimics Medical. Measurement indicators included interradicular distances (IRD), overall bone thickness (OBT), cortical bone thickness (CBT), cortical and cancellous bone density (CoBD & CaBD). One-way ANOVA test of variance was used for statistical comparisons.

RESULTS

IRD increased with apical height, reaching an maximum average measurement of 4.750 ± 1.226 mm at 10 mm axial section. Within the same axial section, the IRD of the region between the two central incisors was significantly larger than that of the other regions. There was no statistical difference in IRD among different vertical skeletal patterns. OBT increased with vertical height in the 2-6 mm axial sections, and no significant difference among three groups. There was a statistical difference of the CBT at 4-8 mm axial sections among the three groups (P < 0.05), but not at 10 mm axial section. There was no statistical difference (P < 0.05) of CaBD among different vertical skeletal patterns. However, there are statistically difference of CoBD in many regions between hypodivergent and hyperdivergent groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomical structure in anterior aesthetic region of individuals varies greatly, and interradicular distances is not affected by vertical skeletal pattern. However, in general, hypodivergent patients have higher bone density and greater bone thickness than that of hyperdivergent patients, which means more safe regions to choose for miniscrew insertion.

摘要

引言

本回顾性队列研究的目的是基于锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)数据,测量不同垂直骨骼型上颌前部区域的牙根间距、骨厚度和骨密度,为前牙美学区域微螺钉植入的最佳部位提供参考。

方法

选取60例成年患者(18 - 29岁),均为安氏I类骨面型(ANB角 = 2° ± 2°),根据垂直骨骼型分为三组(每组n = 20)。根据测量的SN - GoGn角将人群分为三组:低角型(SN - GoGn < 27°)、平均角型(27°≤ SN - GoGn ≤ 37°)和高角型(SN - GoGn > 37°)。CBCT数据由Dolphin Imaging和Mimics Medical软件处理并测量。测量指标包括牙根间距(IRD)、整体骨厚度(OBT)、皮质骨厚度(CBT)、皮质骨和松质骨密度(CoBD和CaBD)。采用单因素方差分析进行统计学比较。

结果

牙根间距随根尖高度增加,在轴向10mm处达到最大平均测量值4.750 ± 1.226mm。在同一轴向平面内,两颗中切牙之间区域的牙根间距显著大于其他区域。不同垂直骨骼型之间的牙根间距无统计学差异。在轴向2 - 6mm平面内,整体骨厚度随垂直高度增加,三组之间无显著差异。三组在轴向4 - 8mm平面内的皮质骨厚度有统计学差异(P < 0.05),但在轴向10mm平面内无差异。不同垂直骨骼型之间的松质骨密度无统计学差异(P < 0.05)。然而,低角型和高角型组在许多区域的皮质骨密度有统计学差异。

结论

个体前牙美学区域的解剖结构差异很大,牙根间距不受垂直骨骼型影响。然而,一般来说,低角型患者比高角型患者具有更高的骨密度和更大的骨厚度,这意味着微螺钉植入有更多安全区域可供选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c5d/12255091/dce9bd073f1b/12903_2025_6538_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 10;4(4):CD003451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003451.pub3.
6
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub2.
8
Positional guidelines for orthodontic mini-implant placement in the anterior alveolar region: a systematic review.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):470-9. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2659.
10
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 13(11):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Bone quality in relation to skeletal maturation in palatal miniscrews insertion sites.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Sep;164(3):406-415. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.02.013. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
2
Effects of root contact length on the failure rate of anchor screw.
J Oral Sci. 2022 Jul 1;64(3):232-235. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.21-0536. Epub 2022 May 30.
5
Bone formation after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: comparison of 2 distraction osteogenesis protocols.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022 Mar;133(3):271-276. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
6
Stability and success rate of dual-thread miniscrews.
Angle Orthod. 2021 Jul 1;91(4):509-514. doi: 10.2319/083020-756.1.
7
Cortical bone thickness and bone density effects on miniscrew success rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Mar;24 Suppl 1:92-102. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12453. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
10
Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults.
Angle Orthod. 2017 Sep;87(5):745-751. doi: 10.2319/011117-34.1. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验