Suppr超能文献

双螺纹微型螺钉的稳定性和成功率。

Stability and success rate of dual-thread miniscrews.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2021 Jul 1;91(4):509-514. doi: 10.2319/083020-756.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To date, the clinical stability of dual-thread orthodontic miniscrews has not been studied. This study aimed to compare the primary stability and long-term clinical success rate of dual-thread and cylindrical orthodontic miniscrews and to examine the association between various clinical factors and the success rate of miniscrews.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 145 cylindrical and 135 dual-thread miniscrews were inserted in the maxillary and mandibular buccal alveolar areas of 142 patients. The torque and Periotest (Siemens, Bensheim, Germany) values were recorded during insertion and removal. The effect of clinical variables such as sex, age, screw design, jaw, side of placement, root proximity, and site of placement on the success rate was examined using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference (P = .595) in the overall clinical success rate between the two designs, with an overall success rate of 82.1% and 84.4% for the cylindrical and dual-thread miniscrews, respectively. Age and screw-root proximity were significantly associated with failure (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The dual-thread miniscrews did not show superior long-term stability and clinical success rate as compared with the cylindrical miniscrews. The results of this study suggest that patient age and screw-root proximity influence the clinical success rate of miniscrews.

摘要

目的

迄今为止,双螺纹正畸微螺钉的临床稳定性尚未得到研究。本研究旨在比较双螺纹和圆柱状正畸微螺钉的初始稳定性和长期临床成功率,并研究各种临床因素与微螺钉成功率之间的关系。

材料和方法

将 145 枚圆柱状和 135 枚双螺纹微螺钉分别植入 142 名患者的上颌和下颌颊侧牙槽骨中。在插入和取出时记录扭矩和 Periotest(德国西门子公司,本海姆)值。使用逻辑回归分析,研究性别、年龄、螺钉设计、颌骨、植入部位侧别、临近牙根和植入部位等临床变量对成功率的影响。

结果

两种设计的总体临床成功率无统计学差异(P=.595),圆柱状和双螺纹微螺钉的总体成功率分别为 82.1%和 84.4%。年龄和螺钉与牙根的接近程度与失败显著相关(P<.05)。

结论

与圆柱状微螺钉相比,双螺纹微螺钉并未显示出更高的长期稳定性和临床成功率。本研究结果表明,患者年龄和螺钉与牙根的接近程度影响微螺钉的临床成功率。

相似文献

1
Stability and success rate of dual-thread miniscrews.
Angle Orthod. 2021 Jul 1;91(4):509-514. doi: 10.2319/083020-756.1.
2
A comparison of tapered and cylindrical miniscrew stability.
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Oct;36(5):557-62. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt092. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
3
Success rates of single-thread and double-thread orthodontic miniscrews in the maxillary arch.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03866-x.
5
Evaluation of the success rate of single- and dual-thread orthodontic miniscrews inserted in the palatal side of the maxillary tuberosity.
J World Fed Orthod. 2022 Jun;11(3):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 May 17.
6
Comparative study of the primary stability of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic miniscrews.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Apr;145(4):480-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.020.
8
Success of miniscrews used as anchorage for orthodontic treatment: analysis of different factors.
Prog Orthod. 2012 Nov;13(3):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pio.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
10
Insertion torque and Periotest values are important factors predicting outcome after orthodontic miniscrew placement.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Oct;152(4):483-488. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.01.026.

引用本文的文献

3
Study on the Reasonability of Single-Objective Optimization in Miniscrew Design.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Feb 21;18(5):973. doi: 10.3390/ma18050973.
5
Global scholarly output on orthodontic temporary anchorage devices (TADs): A silver jublee scientometric analysis.
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Aug;85(Suppl 2):208-222. doi: 10.1007/s00056-024-00530-5. Epub 2024 May 15.
6
Success rates of single-thread and double-thread orthodontic miniscrews in the maxillary arch.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03866-x.
8
Revisiting the Complications of Orthodontic Miniscrew.
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 1;2022:8720412. doi: 10.1155/2022/8720412. eCollection 2022.
9
Mechanical stability of orthodontic miniscrew depends on a thread shape.
J Dent Sci. 2022 Jul;17(3):1244-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

3
Biomechanical Behavior of the Dental Implant Macrodesign.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):264-270. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4797.
4
Peri-implant bone loss clinical and radiographic evaluation around rough neck and microthread implants: a 5-year study.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jun;29(6):635-643. doi: 10.1111/clr.12775. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
6
A comparison of tapered and cylindrical miniscrew stability.
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Oct;36(5):557-62. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt092. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
7
Determinants for success rates of temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a meta-analysis (n > 50).
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Jun;36(3):303-13. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt049. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
8
Accuracy of miniscrew surgical guides assessed from cone-beam computed tomography and digital models.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):893-901. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.018.
9
The effect of miniscrew taper morphology on insertion and removal torque in dogs.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):777-83.
10
Factors affecting the long-term stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 May;137(5):588.e1-5; discussion 588-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验