Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌患者接受射频消融与微波消融治疗后的局部效应和全身T细胞反应比较。

Comparison of local effects and systemic T-cell responses in patients with breast cancer treated by radiofrequency ablation versus microwave ablation.

作者信息

Yu Muxin, Wang Bangjie, Qu Ying, Sun Wen, Liang Mengdi, Mao Xinrui, Jiang Yunshan, Wang Jiaming, Tang Xinyu, Pan Hong, Zhao Yi, Xie Hui, Ding Qiang, Wang Shui, Zhou Wenbin

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.

Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, China.

出版信息

Cancer Cell Int. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12935-025-03896-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) have been investigated as treatments for early-stage breast cancer. However, it is unclear which minimally invasive thermal therapy demonstrates superior local efficacy. Also, the cytolytic functions of peripheral T cells after thermal ablation in solid tumors have not been reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, 60 patients with breast cancer were enrolled from two clinical trials conducted between March 2020 and December 2021. The local effect of thermal ablation evaluated through pathological examinations or radiological imaging was the primary outcome. The secondary outcome involved systemic T-cell responses. Peripheral blood samples were collected before and after treatments. The ablation-induced immune responses were analyzed using flow cytometry, enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA), quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and single-cell RNA sequencing.

RESULTS

Both RFA and MWA showed favorable local effects in the treatment of breast cancer. Compared to surgery, RFA increased peripheral CD8 + T-cell proportions but did not enhance their cytolytic functions. Conversely, MWA induced stronger cytolytic functions of peripheral T cells and upregulated memory CD4 + T cells. The distinct immune responses induced by MWA and RFA were associated with variations in antigen presentation pathways, types of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), and cytokine secretion profiles. Single-cell RNA sequencing further revealed that dendritic cells were the APCs activated by MWA, exhibiting upregulated fatty acid metabolism.

CONCLUSION

Both thermal ablation therapies are technically feasible for early-stage breast cancer. However, MWA appears superior in enhancing the cytolytic functions of peripheral T cells compared to RFA. This study provides the first mechanistic insight into the different immune responses induced by MWA and RFA, although future clinical trials are necessary to validate these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2000029665. Registered February 09, 2020 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=48315 ) and ChiCTR2000029155. Registered January 16, 2020 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=48314 ).

摘要

背景

射频消融(RFA)和微波消融(MWA)已被研究用于早期乳腺癌的治疗。然而,尚不清楚哪种微创热疗具有更优的局部疗效。此外,实体瘤热消融后外周T细胞的细胞溶解功能尚未见报道。

材料与方法

本研究从2020年3月至2021年12月进行的两项临床试验中纳入了60例乳腺癌患者。通过病理检查或影像学评估热消融的局部效果为主要结局。次要结局包括全身T细胞反应。在治疗前后采集外周血样本。使用流式细胞术、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、定量实时聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)和单细胞RNA测序分析消融诱导的免疫反应。

结果

RFA和MWA在乳腺癌治疗中均显示出良好的局部效果。与手术相比,RFA增加了外周CD8 + T细胞比例,但未增强其细胞溶解功能。相反,MWA诱导外周T细胞更强的细胞溶解功能,并上调记忆CD4 + T细胞。MWA和RFA诱导的不同免疫反应与抗原呈递途径、抗原呈递细胞(APC)类型和细胞因子分泌谱的变化有关。单细胞RNA测序进一步揭示树突状细胞是被MWA激活的APC,表现出脂肪酸代谢上调。

结论

两种热消融疗法在技术上对早期乳腺癌都是可行的。然而,与RFA相比,MWA在增强外周T细胞的细胞溶解功能方面似乎更具优势。本研究首次对MWA和RFA诱导的不同免疫反应提供了机制性见解,尽管未来还需要进行临床试验来验证这些发现。

试验注册

ChiCTR2000029665。于2020年2月9日注册(https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=48315)和ChiCTR2000029155。于2020年1月16日注册(https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=48314)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/574f/12254964/3cf1c3180fed/12935_2025_3896_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验