Grimaldi Francesco, Memoli Mara, Avilia Simona, Causa Carlangela, Giannattasio Maria Luisa, Conversano Italia, Lisi Dario, D'Angelo Daniela, Iannotta Raffaella, Schiano Moriello Nicola, Viceconte Giulio, Zappulo Emanuela, Gentile Ivan, Picardi Marco, Pane Fabrizio
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Division, University of Napoli "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Infectious Diseases Division, University of Napoli "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 28;17(13):2184. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132184.
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a major complication in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), particularly during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Posaconazole is the standard drug for primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP), but its use is limited by oral bioavailability and CYP3A4 interactions. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous caspofungin versus oral posaconazole as PAP in AML patients during their first cycle of chemotherapy and assess their subsequent impact on clinical outcomes. A retrospective, monocentric study was conducted on 75 consecutive AML patients treated at the Federico II University Medical School of Naples, Italy (2021-2025). Patients received either caspofungin or posaconazole as PAP based on the drug-drug interaction risk or clinical conditions. IFIs were diagnosed using EORTC/MSG criteria. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to assess risk factors and overall survival (OS). IFI incidence was 13.3% overall (9.4% proven/probable). No significant difference was found between the caspofungin and posaconazole groups (six vs. four IFIs; = 0.878). Post-chemotherapy refractory AML (OR = 11.9; = 0.003) and liver disease (OR = 30.4; = 0.004) independently predicted IFI development. Median OS did not significantly differ in patients receiving caspofungin versus posaconazole (29.3 vs. 32.1 months, = 0.6). Caspofungin appears clinically comparable to posaconazole for PAP in AML during the induction phase, especially when azole use is contraindicated. Prospective studies are warranted to refine prophylactic strategies in the era of new AML therapies.
侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)是急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的主要并发症,尤其是在化疗诱导的中性粒细胞减少期间。泊沙康唑是主要抗真菌预防(PAP)的标准药物,但其使用受到口服生物利用度和CYP3A4相互作用的限制。本研究旨在评估静脉注射卡泊芬净与口服泊沙康唑作为AML患者化疗第一周期PAP的临床疗效和安全性,并评估它们随后对临床结局的影响。对意大利那不勒斯费德里科二世大学医学院连续治疗的75例AML患者进行了一项回顾性单中心研究(2021 - 2025年)。根据药物相互作用风险或临床情况,患者接受卡泊芬净或泊沙康唑作为PAP。使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织/美国国立医学图书馆(EORTC/MSG)标准诊断IFI。采用逻辑回归和Cox回归模型评估危险因素和总生存期(OS)。IFI总发生率为13.3%(确诊/疑似为9.4%)。卡泊芬净组和泊沙康唑组之间未发现显著差异(分别为6例和4例IFI;P = 0.878)。化疗后难治性AML(OR = 11.9;P = 0.003)和肝病(OR = 30.4;P = 0.004)独立预测IFI的发生。接受卡泊芬净与泊沙康唑治疗的患者中位OS无显著差异(分别为29.3个月和32.1个月,P = 0.6)。在诱导期,卡泊芬净在临床上似乎与泊沙康唑作为AML的PAP相当,特别是在唑类药物使用禁忌时。有必要进行前瞻性研究以完善新的AML治疗时代的预防策略。