Tulin Adrian Daniel, Ion Daniela-Elena, Avino Adelaida, Gheoca-Mutu Daniela-Elena, Abu-Baker Abdalah, Țigăran Andrada-Elena, Timofan Teodora, Ostafi Ileana, Jecan Cristian Radu, Răducu Laura
Discipline of Anatomy, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Department of General Surgery, 'Prof. Dr Agrippa Ionescu' Clinical Emergency Hospital, 011356 Bucharest, Romania.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;17(13):2267. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132267.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this case series is to evaluate the outcomes and safety of video-assisted mastectomy, illustrating the harmonious collaboration of oncologic and plastic surgery. This novel minimally invasive technique allows immediate prosthetic reconstruction and represents a cost-effective alternative to robotic breast surgery. METHODS: Video-assisted, single-port nipple-sparing mastectomies were performed in patients with small to medium-sized breasts, followed by immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction with either prepectoral or dual plane implant placement. The patients' electronic medical records were analyzed, including demographic characteristics, operative times and histopathology reports. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients underwent successful video-assisted mastectomy, without conversion to traditional open procedure. Fifteen of the operations were risk-reducing mastectomies. Twelve patients had complementary procedures performed concurrently on the previously operated contralateral breast (delayed reconstruction/expander-to-implant exchange). Moreover, three patients benefited from additional minimally invasive techniques during the same surgery (prophylactic laparoscopic hysterectomy). Immediate breast reconstruction with polyurethane or microtextured breast implants up to 450 cc was performed, with satisfactory aesthetic outcomes and no cancer recurrences at 6 to 12 months postoperative follow-up. Early complications included transient hypercapnia, areolar congestion and cellulitis. No skin necrosis or implant-related complications were reported. The most frequently encountered late issues were contour irregularities. CONCLUSIONS: Video-assisted mastectomy facilitates the safe removal of proven pathologic or healthy breast tissue with minimal damage to the breast's skin envelope, facilitating single-stage breast reconstruction.
背景/目的:本病例系列的目的是评估视频辅助乳房切除术的效果和安全性,展示肿瘤外科与整形手术的和谐协作。这种新型微创技术允许立即进行假体重建,是机器人乳房手术具有成本效益的替代方案。 方法:对中小乳房患者进行视频辅助单孔保乳乳房切除术,随后立即进行胸前或双平面植入的直接植入式重建。分析患者的电子病历,包括人口统计学特征、手术时间和组织病理学报告。 结果:共有18例患者成功接受了视频辅助乳房切除术,未转为传统开放手术。其中15例手术为降低风险的乳房切除术。12例患者在先前手术的对侧乳房同时进行了补充手术(延迟重建/扩张器至植入物更换)。此外,3例患者在同一手术中受益于额外的微创技术(预防性腹腔镜子宫切除术)。使用最大450cc的聚氨酯或微纹理乳房植入物进行了即刻乳房重建,术后6至12个月随访时美学效果满意,无癌症复发。早期并发症包括短暂性高碳酸血症、乳晕充血和蜂窝织炎。未报告皮肤坏死或与植入物相关的并发症。最常见的晚期问题是外形不规则。 结论:视频辅助乳房切除术有助于安全切除已证实的病理或健康乳房组织,对乳房皮肤包膜损伤最小,便于进行一期乳房重建。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004-10-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-5-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-3-27
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024-11
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-5
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023-11
J Clin Med. 2025-6-19
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2025-1
Ann Breast Surg. 2024-6-30
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024-4