• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向工程安全的爆破地震波信号处理:一种基于多尺度特征的EMD端点抑制方法

Engineering Safety-Oriented Blasting-Induced Seismic Wave Signal Processing: An EMD Endpoint Suppression Method Based on Multi-Scale Feature.

作者信息

Sun Miao, Wu Jing, Lu Yani, Yu Fangda, Zhou Hang

机构信息

School of Civil Engineering & Research Center of Hubei Small Town Development, Hubei Engineering University, Xiaogan 432000, China.

Engineering Research Center of Rock-Soil Drilling & Excavation and Protection, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 5;25(13):4194. doi: 10.3390/s25134194.

DOI:10.3390/s25134194
PMID:40648449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12252125/
Abstract

Blasting-induced seismic waves are typically nonlinear and non-stationary signals. The EMD-Hilbert transform is commonly used for time-frequency analysis of such signals. However, during the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) processing of blasting-induced seismic waves, endpoint effects occur, resulting in varying degrees of divergence in the obtained intrinsic mode function (IMF) components at both ends. The further application of the Hilbert transform to these endpoint-divergent IMFs yield artificial time-frequency analysis results, adversely impacting the assessment of blasting-induced seismic wave hazards. This paper proposes an improved EMD endpoint effect suppression algorithm that considers local endpoint development trends, global time distribution, energy matching, and waveform matching. The method first analyzes global temporal characteristics and endpoint amplitude variations to obtain left and right endpoint extension signal fragment S() and S(). Using these as references, the original signal is divided into "b" equal segments S(), S() … S(). Energy matching and waveform matching functions are then established to identify signal fragments S() and S() that match both the energy and waveform characteristics of S() and S(). Replacing S() and S() with S() and S() effectively suppresses the EMD endpoint effects. To verify the algorithm's effectiveness in suppressing EMD endpoint effects, comparative studies were conducted using simulated signals to compare the proposed method with mirror extension, polynomial fitting, and extreme value extension methods. Three evaluation metrics were utilized: error standard deviation, correlation coefficient, and computation time. The results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm effectively reduces the divergence at the endpoints of the IMFs and yields physically meaningful IMF components. Finally, the method was applied to the analysis of actual blasting seismic signals. It successfully suppressed the endpoint effects of EMD and improved the extraction of time-frequency characteristics from blasting-induced seismic waves. This has significant practical implications for safety assessments of existing structures in areas affected by blasting.

摘要

爆破引起的地震波通常是非线性和非平稳信号。经验模态分解(EMD)-希尔伯特变换常用于此类信号的时频分析。然而,在对爆破引起的地震波进行经验模态分解(EMD)处理过程中,会出现端点效应,导致所获得的本征模态函数(IMF)分量在两端出现不同程度的发散。将希尔伯特变换进一步应用于这些端点发散的IMF会产生人为的时频分析结果,对爆破引起的地震波危害评估产生不利影响。本文提出了一种改进的EMD端点效应抑制算法,该算法考虑了局部端点发展趋势、全局时间分布、能量匹配和波形匹配。该方法首先分析全局时间特征和端点幅度变化,以获得左右端点扩展信号片段S( )和S( )。以此为参考,将原始信号划分为“b”个等长段S( )、S( )…S( )。然后建立能量匹配和波形匹配函数,以识别与S( )和S( )的能量和波形特征都匹配的信号片段S( )和S( )。用S( )和S( )替换S( )和S( )可有效抑制EMD端点效应。为验证该算法在抑制EMD端点效应方面的有效性,使用模拟信号进行了对比研究,并将该方法与镜像扩展、多项式拟合和极值扩展方法进行比较。采用了三个评估指标:误差标准差、相关系数和计算时间。结果表明,所提出的算法有效降低了IMF端点处的发散,并产生了具有物理意义的IMF分量。最后,将该方法应用于实际爆破地震信号的分析。它成功抑制了EMD的端点效应,改善了爆破引起的地震波时频特征的提取。这对爆破影响区域内现有结构的安全评估具有重要的实际意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/d35565116238/sensors-25-04194-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/6193170961a8/sensors-25-04194-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/bb7f837897e3/sensors-25-04194-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/7eac6688eb25/sensors-25-04194-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/1fbe06c210e0/sensors-25-04194-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/69af70fd1476/sensors-25-04194-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/136923f0bf8a/sensors-25-04194-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/2665bc8be9ee/sensors-25-04194-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/cf0ae71e98f4/sensors-25-04194-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/661a52f6acb7/sensors-25-04194-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/ec8b36ca2222/sensors-25-04194-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/d35565116238/sensors-25-04194-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/6193170961a8/sensors-25-04194-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/bb7f837897e3/sensors-25-04194-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/7eac6688eb25/sensors-25-04194-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/1fbe06c210e0/sensors-25-04194-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/69af70fd1476/sensors-25-04194-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/136923f0bf8a/sensors-25-04194-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/2665bc8be9ee/sensors-25-04194-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/cf0ae71e98f4/sensors-25-04194-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/661a52f6acb7/sensors-25-04194-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/ec8b36ca2222/sensors-25-04194-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db98/12252125/d35565116238/sensors-25-04194-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Engineering Safety-Oriented Blasting-Induced Seismic Wave Signal Processing: An EMD Endpoint Suppression Method Based on Multi-Scale Feature.面向工程安全的爆破地震波信号处理:一种基于多尺度特征的EMD端点抑制方法
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 5;25(13):4194. doi: 10.3390/s25134194.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
4
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
5
An efficient sparse code shrinkage technique for ECG denoising using empirical mode decomposition.一种基于经验模态分解的用于心电图去噪的高效稀疏码收缩技术。
Technol Health Care. 2025 Jul;33(4):1773-1786. doi: 10.1177/09287329241302749. Epub 2025 Feb 2.
6
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
A Novel Design of a Portable Birdcage via Meander Line Antenna (MLA) to Lower Beta Amyloid (Aβ) in Alzheimer's Disease.一种通过曲折线天线(MLA)设计的便携式鸟笼,用于降低阿尔茨海默病中的β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)。
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2025 Apr 10;13:158-173. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2025.3559693. eCollection 2025.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of Signal Decomposition Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring on an Experimental Benchmark.基于实验基准的结构健康监测中信号分解技术的比较分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 5;21(5):1825. doi: 10.3390/s21051825.