Kucio Michał, Kułach Andrzej, Skowerski Tomasz, Bałys Mariusz, Skowerski Mariusz, Smolka Grzegorz
Division of Cardiology, Upper Silesian Medical Center, 40-635 Katowice, Poland.
Department of Cardiology, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 22;14(13):4433. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134433.
Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) plays an established role in the management of heart failure, a significant proportion of patients do not respond despite appropriate candidate selection. The optimization of CRT pacing is one strategy to enhance response. Fusion pacing algorithms aim to synchronize intrinsic right ventricular (RV) conduction with paced left ventricular (LV) activation, resulting in a more physiological ventricular depolarization pattern. This approach may improve electrical synchrony and enhance left ventricular contraction compared to conventional simultaneous biventricular pacing. The aim of this study was to compare the acute, beat-to-beat effects of standard biventricular pacing versus fusion pacing on myocardial function, using both conventional and speckle-tracking echocardiography in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). : In total, 27 heart failure patients (21 men and 6 women) with reduced ejection fraction (EF < 35%), left bundle branch block (QRS > 150 ms), and newly implanted CRT-D systems (Abbott) underwent echocardiographic assessment immediately after device implantation. Echocardiographic parameters-including left atrial strain, left ventricular strain, TAPSE, mitral and tricuspid valve function, and cardiac output-were measured at 5 min intervals under three different pacing conditions: pacing off, simultaneous biventricular pacing, and fusion pacing using Abbott's SyncAV algorithm. : In our study, CRT led to a significant shortening of the QRS duration from 169 ± 19 ms at baseline to 131 ± 17 ms with standard biventricular pacing, and further to 118 ± 16 ms with fusion pacing ( < 0.05). Despite the electrical improvement, no significant changes were observed in global longitudinal strain (GLS: -9.15 vs. -9.39 vs. -9.13; = NS), left ventricular stroke volume (67.5 mL vs. 68.4 mL vs. 68.5 mL; = NS), or left atrial parameters including strain, area, and ejection fraction. However, fusion pacing was associated with more homogeneous segmental strain patterns, improved aortic valve closure time, and enhanced right ventricular function as reflected by tissue Doppler-derived S'. : Immediate QRS narrowing observed in CRT patients-particularly with fusion pacing optimization-is associated with a more homogeneous pattern of left ventricular contractility and improvements in selected measures of mechanical synchrony. However, these acute electrical changes do not translate into immediate improvements in stroke volume, global LV strain, or left atrial function. Longer-term follow-up is needed to determine whether the electrical benefits of CRT, especially with fusion pacing, lead to meaningful hemodynamic improvements.
尽管心脏再同步治疗(CRT)在心力衰竭的管理中发挥着既定作用,但尽管进行了适当的候选者选择,仍有相当一部分患者没有反应。优化CRT起搏是提高反应的一种策略。融合起搏算法旨在使右心室(RV)固有传导与左心室(LV)起搏激活同步,从而产生更生理性的心室去极化模式。与传统的双心室同步起搏相比,这种方法可能会改善电同步性并增强左心室收缩。本研究的目的是在患有左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的心力衰竭患者中,使用传统超声心动图和斑点追踪超声心动图比较标准双心室起搏与融合起搏对心肌功能的急性逐搏效应。总共27例射血分数降低(EF<35%)、左束支传导阻滞(QRS>150 ms)且新植入CRT-D系统(雅培)的心力衰竭患者(21名男性和6名女性)在设备植入后立即接受了超声心动图评估。在三种不同的起搏条件下,每隔5分钟测量一次超声心动图参数,包括左心房应变、左心室应变、三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(TAPSE)、二尖瓣和三尖瓣功能以及心输出量:起搏关闭、双心室同步起搏以及使用雅培SyncAV算法的融合起搏。在我们的研究中,CRT导致QRS持续时间从基线时的169±19 ms显著缩短至标准双心室起搏时的131±17 ms,融合起搏时进一步缩短至118±16 ms(P<0.05)。尽管电活动有所改善,但整体纵向应变(GLS:-9.15对-9.39对-9.13;P=无显著性差异)、左心室每搏输出量(67.5 mL对68.4 mL对68.5 mL;P=无显著性差异)或包括应变、面积和射血分数在内的左心房参数均未观察到显著变化。然而,融合起搏与更均匀的节段应变模式、改善的主动脉瓣关闭时间以及组织多普勒衍生的S'所反映的右心室功能增强有关。CRT患者中观察到的即刻QRS变窄——尤其是融合起搏优化时——与左心室收缩性更均匀的模式以及机械同步性的某些测量指标的改善有关。然而,这些急性电变化并没有转化为每搏输出量、整体左心室应变或左心房功能的即刻改善。需要进行长期随访以确定CRT的电益处,尤其是融合起搏,是否会导致有意义的血流动力学改善。