• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型冠状动脉造影衍生的定量功能评估与基于导丝的血流储备分数和微血管阻力指数的比较验证:前瞻性多中心FAIR研究

Validation of a Novel Coronary Angiography-Derived Quantitative Functional Assessment Compared with Wire-Based FFR and IMR: The Prospective Multicenter FAIR Study.

作者信息

Xu Changwu, Xue Qiang, Liang Jianwen, Fu Guosheng, Wu Qiang, Jin Qing, Wei Wenbin, Qiu Fuyu, Yao Huali, Jiang Hong

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.

Department of Cardiology, Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City (Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University), Kunming 650051, China.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 25;14(13):4503. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134503.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14134503
PMID:40648877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12250030/
Abstract

Synchronous computation of coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CAG-FFR) and coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (CAG-IMR) is a novel coronary angiography-based method for on-site assessment of suspected myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This trial is a prospective, multicenter, controlled study designed to assess the diagnostic performance of CAG-FFR and CAG-IMR in patients with suspected myocardial ischemia using wire-based FFR and IMR as reference standards. The functional parameters were calculated using a reduced order computational fluid dynamics solver that incorporates thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count and aortic pressure recorded by a disposable invasive pressure sensor. CAG-FFR was computed in 325 patients, demonstrating a patient-level diagnostic accuracy of 95.4%, sensitivity of 95.9%, and specificity of 95.1%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of CAG-FFR was 0.977. Patient-specific aortic pressure adoption significantly improved the accuracy of CAG-FFR in the "gray zone" compared to fixed-pressure models. In addition, CAG-IMR was successfully computed in 180 patients, showing a patient-level diagnostic accuracy of 95.5%, sensitivity of 96.4%, and specificity of 95.2%. The AUC of CAG-IMR in diagnosing abnormal coronary microcirculatory dysfunction was 0.973. Synchronous computation of CAG-FFR and CAG-IMR demonstrated higher feasibility and excellent diagnostic accuracy compared to wire-based FFR and IMR, highlighting its clinical potential for CAD evaluation.

摘要

同步计算冠状动脉造影衍生的血流储备分数(CAG-FFR)和冠状动脉造影衍生的微循环阻力指数(CAG-IMR)是一种基于冠状动脉造影的新型方法,用于现场评估冠心病(CAD)患者疑似心肌缺血情况。本试验是一项前瞻性、多中心、对照研究,旨在以基于导丝的FFR和IMR作为参考标准,评估CAG-FFR和CAG-IMR在疑似心肌缺血患者中的诊断性能。使用一种降阶计算流体动力学求解器计算功能参数,该求解器纳入了心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)帧数和由一次性侵入性压力传感器记录的主动脉压力。对325例患者计算了CAG-FFR,显示患者水平的诊断准确率为95.4%,敏感性为95.9%,特异性为95.1%。CAG-FFR的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.977。与固定压力模型相比,采用患者特异性主动脉压力显著提高了CAG-FFR在“灰色区域”的准确性。此外,对180例患者成功计算了CAG-IMR,显示患者水平的诊断准确率为95.5%,敏感性为96.4%,特异性为95.2%。CAG-IMR诊断异常冠状动脉微循环功能障碍的AUC为0.973。与基于导丝的FFR和IMR相比,CAG-FFR和CAG-IMR的同步计算显示出更高的可行性和优异的诊断准确性,突出了其在CAD评估中的临床潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa27/12250030/945d67b50e47/jcm-14-04503-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa27/12250030/a501795dbb8b/jcm-14-04503-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa27/12250030/8c075a7bb78f/jcm-14-04503-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa27/12250030/f5daa4a9ce75/jcm-14-04503-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa27/12250030/76cef5ec60c6/jcm-14-04503-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa27/12250030/770ad2e1fd3b/jcm-14-04503-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa27/12250030/945d67b50e47/jcm-14-04503-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa27/12250030/a501795dbb8b/jcm-14-04503-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa27/12250030/8c075a7bb78f/jcm-14-04503-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa27/12250030/f5daa4a9ce75/jcm-14-04503-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa27/12250030/76cef5ec60c6/jcm-14-04503-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa27/12250030/770ad2e1fd3b/jcm-14-04503-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa27/12250030/945d67b50e47/jcm-14-04503-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a Novel Coronary Angiography-Derived Quantitative Functional Assessment Compared with Wire-Based FFR and IMR: The Prospective Multicenter FAIR Study.一种新型冠状动脉造影衍生的定量功能评估与基于导丝的血流储备分数和微血管阻力指数的比较验证:前瞻性多中心FAIR研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 25;14(13):4503. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134503.
2
A novel algorithm for automated analysis of coronary CTA-derived FFR in identifying ischemia-specific CAD: A multicenter study.一种用于自动分析冠状动脉CTA衍生FFR以识别缺血特异性CAD的新算法:一项多中心研究。
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17803. doi: 10.1002/mp.17803. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
3
Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve and CT-derived fractional flow reserve: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.血管造影衍生的血流储备分数和CT衍生的血流储备分数的诊断性能:一项系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
J Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar;17(1):119-133. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12573. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
Coronary Physiological Indexes to Evaluate Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Valve Replacement.评估行瓣膜置换术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者心肌缺血的冠状动脉生理指标
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan 27;18(2):201-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.024. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
5
Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Derived Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio (μQFR) Versus Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in Moderate to Severe Calcified Coronary Lesions-The DIAMOND Study.基于血管造影的Murray定律的定量血流比(μQFR)与基于压力的血流储备分数(FFR)在中度至重度钙化冠状动脉病变中的诊断准确性——钻石研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):377-383. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31553. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
6
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) relationship in patients with chronic or stabilized acute coronary syndromes.慢性或稳定型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的血流储备分数(FFR)与微循环阻力指数(IMR)的关系
Int J Cardiol. 2025 Mar 1;422:132978. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.132978. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
7
Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Based Vessel-Fractional Flow Reserve Compared with Various Wire-Based Physiological Assessments.基于血管造影的血管分数血流储备与各种基于导丝的生理评估的诊断性能比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31534.
8
Agreement of Fractional Flow Reserve Estimated by Computed Tomography With Invasively Measured Fractional Flow Reserve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于计算机断层扫描的血流储备分数与有创血流储备分数的一致性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e034552. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034552. Epub 2024 May 10.
9
Accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio for onsite assessment of coronary lesions.冠状动脉 CT 血管造影衍生的定量血流比评估冠状动脉病变的准确性。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Oct 21;20(20):e1288-e1297. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00336.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic CZT-SPECT in coronary artery disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis.动态 CZT-SPECT 在冠心病诊断中的准确性。系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Aug;29(4):1686-1697. doi: 10.1007/s12350-021-02721-8. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of multi-branch coronary angiography-based index of microcirculatory resistance: a novel approach.基于多支冠状动脉血管造影的微循环阻力指数的诊断性能:一种新方法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 17;12:1490346. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1490346. eCollection 2025.
2
A Systematic Approach to the Evaluation of the Coronary Microcirculation Using Bolus Thermodilution: CATH CMD.一种使用团注热稀释法评估冠状动脉微循环的系统方法:CATH CMD。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Apr 3;3(7):101934. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101934. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Prognostic Value of Coronary Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.
非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉造影衍生的微血管阻力指数的预后价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Aug 26;17(16):1874-1886. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.04.048. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
4
Consensus document on the clinical application of invasive functional coronary angiography from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.日本心血管介入治疗协会关于有创功能冠状动脉造影临床应用的共识文件。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Apr;39(2):109-125. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-00988-5. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
5
The Index of Microcirculatory Resistance After Primary PCI: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后微血管阻力指数:一项个体患者数据分析的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Oct 9;16(19):2383-2392. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.08.030.
6
Angiography-based index of microcirculatory resistance (AccuIMR) for the assessment of microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome and chronic coronary syndrome.基于血管造影术的微循环阻力指数(AccuIMR)用于评估急性冠脉综合征和慢性冠脉综合征中的微血管功能障碍。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Jun 1;13(6):3556-3568. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-961. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
7
Applied coronary physiology for planning and guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the European Society of Cardiology.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的应用冠状动脉生理学:欧洲心脏病学会欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)的临床共识声明。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Aug 21;19(6):464-481. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00194.
8
The diagnostic performance of AccuFFRangio for evaluating coronary artery stenosis under different computational conditions.AccuFFRangio在不同计算条件下评估冠状动脉狭窄的诊断性能。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Apr 1;13(4):2496-2506. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-893. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
9
Coronary microvascular dysfunction: A review of recent progress and clinical implications.冠状动脉微血管功能障碍:近期进展与临床意义综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 26;10:1111721. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1111721. eCollection 2023.
10
Routine Pressure Wire Assessment Versus Conventional Angiography in the Management of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: The RIPCORD 2 Trial.常规压力导丝评估与常规血管造影在冠心病患者管理中的比较:RIPCORD 2 试验。
Circulation. 2022 Aug 30;146(9):687-698. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057793. Epub 2022 Aug 10.