Pollak Mordechai, Bar-Yoseph Ronen, Hanna Moneera, Serruya Noa, Gut Guy, Bentur Lea, Gur Michal
Pediatric Pulmonary Institute, Rappaport Children's Hospital, Rambam Healthcare Campus, P.O. Box 9602, Haifa 3109601, Israel.
The Adelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 7;14(13):4778. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134778.
Although patients with bronchiectasis tend to have obstructive nonreversible lung functions, some have bronchodilator response (BDR), and a relatively large number are treated with bronchodilators. We assessed BDR in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and other bronchiectatic diseases and healthy controls (HCs) in a randomized controlled setup. Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) and non-CF non-PCD bronchiectasis (non-CF/PCD), as well as HCs, were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to receive salbutamol (four puffs) and then a placebo or a placebo and then salbutamol. BDR was calculated using the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) standard, defined as the change related to the individual's predicted value (new method) or to the initial value (old method). Sixty-nine patients (CF = 30, PCD = 20, non-CF/PCD = 19) and 20 HCs were included. Patients with CF and PCD (but not non-CF/PCD) had a statistically greater mean response to salbutamol compared with the placebo, (CF-salbutamol first: 2.82 vs. 0.85%, = 0.01; placebo first: 2.39 vs. -0.27%, = 0.02; PCD-salbutamol first: 5.32 vs. 1.88%, = 0.01; placebo first: 2.24 vs. 0.77%, = 0.05). Few patients had significant BDR (new method, >10%)-CF (0), PCD (2), non-CF/PCD (0) and HCs (2)): using the old method, an additional PCD patient and three non-CF/PCD had significant BDR (>12%). Significant BDR seems to be rare in patients with bronchiectasis. In CF and PCD, the response was greater than the placebo; the clinical significance of this difference and its therapeutic implications, as well as the best method to determine BDR, have yet to be determined.
尽管支气管扩张症患者往往具有阻塞性不可逆肺功能,但部分患者存在支气管舒张反应(BDR),且有相当数量的患者接受支气管扩张剂治疗。我们在一项随机对照试验中评估了囊性纤维化(CF)患者、其他支气管扩张性疾病患者及健康对照者(HCs)的BDR。招募了囊性纤维化(CF)、原发性纤毛运动障碍(PCD)和非CF非PCD支气管扩张症(非CF/PCD)患者以及健康对照者。参与者被随机分配先接受沙丁胺醇(四喷)然后接受安慰剂,或先接受安慰剂然后接受沙丁胺醇。BDR根据美国胸科学会(ATS)/欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)标准计算,定义为相对于个体预测值(新方法)或初始值(旧方法)的变化。纳入了69例患者(CF = 30例、PCD = 20例、非CF/PCD = 19例)和20例健康对照者。与安慰剂相比,CF和PCD患者(而非非CF/PCD患者)对沙丁胺醇的平均反应在统计学上显著更大(CF - 先使用沙丁胺醇:2.82%对0.85%,P = 0.01;先使用安慰剂:2.39%对 - 0.27%,P = 0.02;PCD - 先使用沙丁胺醇:5.32%对1.88%,P = 0.01;先使用安慰剂:2.24%对0.77%,P = 0.05)。很少有患者有显著的BDR(新方法,>10%)——CF(0例)、PCD(2例)、非CF/PCD(0例)和健康对照者(2例):使用旧方法,另外1例PCD患者和3例非CF/PCD患者有显著的BDR(>12%)。显著BDR在支气管扩张症患者中似乎很少见。在CF和PCD中,反应大于安慰剂;这种差异的临床意义及其治疗意义,以及确定BDR的最佳方法尚未确定。