Padma Swetha S, Mujeeb Abdul, Mohamed Roshan Noor, Basha Sakeenabi, Karobari Mohmed Isaqail
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, S.J.M. Dental College and Hospital, Chitradurga, India.
Preventive Dentistry Department (Pediatric Dentistry Division), Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Jul 12. doi: 10.1111/jerd.70000.
To evaluate the effect of hydrogen peroxide bleaching, activated by 980 and 940 nm diode lasers, on the interfacial micropermeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
60 extracted, mandibular premolars with a single root were selected and subjected to bleaching using Opalescence Boost, a 40% hydrogen peroxide gel. An even application of bleaching gel, measuring 1 mm in thickness, was administered to the buccal aspect of the tooth surface of each specimen and allowed to remain undisturbed for 20 min, after which it was removed via suction. Specimens were then randomly allocated into three distinct experimental cohorts (n = 20 per cohort): Group I (control) underwent conventional bleaching with 40% hydrogen peroxide; Group II received bleaching activated by a 980 nm diode laser; Group III by a 940 nm diode laser. Ten days postbleaching, standardized Class V cavities were precisely prepared on the buccal surfaces of the teeth using a high-speed handpiece equipped with a diamond fissure bur under continuous water cooling, incorporating a 45° enamel margin bevel. All prepared cavities were subsequently restored using a resin composite material. Quantitative assessment of microleakage at the occlusal and gingival interfaces was conducted through stereomicroscopic examination and scored using the criteria established by Khoroushi et al.
Groups II and III demonstrated comparatively lower interfacial microleakage occurring along the occlusal and gingival restorative margins relative to Group I. Although Group III exhibited minimal microleakage among all groups, comparative analysis indicated no appreciable difference between Group II and Group III based on the observed data.
Within the scope and boundaries of the present study, it may be inferred that tooth bleaching employing 40% hydrogen peroxide resulted in the greatest microleakage along the occlusal and gingival interfaces, whereas diode laser-activated bleaching at 940 and 980 nm yielded significantly lower microleakage. Comparative analysis indicated no appreciable difference between Groups II and III.
评估980和940nm二极管激光激活的过氧化氢漂白对V类树脂复合材料修复体界面微渗透性的影响。
选取60颗单根下颌前磨牙,用Opalescence Boost(一种40%过氧化氢凝胶)进行漂白。在每个标本的牙齿颊面均匀涂抹厚度为1mm的漂白凝胶,静置20分钟,然后通过抽吸去除。标本随后被随机分为三个不同的实验组(每组n = 20):第一组(对照组)用40%过氧化氢进行常规漂白;第二组接受980nm二极管激光激活的漂白;第三组接受940nm二极管激光激活的漂白。漂白后10天,使用配备金刚石裂钻的高速手机在牙齿颊面精确制备标准化的V类洞,在持续水冷下制备,有45°牙釉质边缘斜面。所有制备的洞随后用树脂复合材料修复。通过体视显微镜检查对咬合面和牙龈界面的微渗漏进行定量评估,并根据Khoroushi等人制定的标准进行评分。
相对于第一组,第二组和第三组在咬合面和牙龈修复边缘处的界面微渗漏相对较低。虽然第三组在所有组中微渗漏最小,但基于观察数据的比较分析表明,第二组和第三组之间没有明显差异。
在本研究的范围内,可以推断,使用40%过氧化氢进行牙齿漂白会导致咬合面和牙龈界面的微渗漏最大,而940和980nm二极管激光激活的漂白产生的微渗漏明显较低。比较分析表明,第二组和第三组之间没有明显差异。