Suppr超能文献

琥珀色发光二极管光生物调节疗法与氨甲环酸治疗黄褐斑的随机对照双盲试点试验。

Amber LED photobiomodulation versus tranexamic acid for the treatment of melasma: randomized controlled double-blind pilot trial.

作者信息

Galache Thais Rodrigues, Galache Marcelo, Barros Renata Taylor de Brito, Bezerra Cicero Dayves da Silva, Sena Michelle Mota, Pavani Christiane

机构信息

Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, Brazil.

Odontologia Galache, São Caetano do Sul, Brazil.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Jul 12;40(1):313. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04567-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of amber photobiomodulation (PBM) compared to topical tranexamic acid (TXA) for the treatment of melasma.

METHODS

In a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial, 21 women were randomized to either active PBM with placebo cream (n = 10) or sham PBM with 5% liposomal TXA cream (n = 11) for 12 weeks. A noninferiority study was chosen based on the hypothesis that PBM could offer comparable efficacy to TXA with fewer adverse effects. The primary outcome was the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI). Secondary outcomes included corneomelametry, Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), quality of life measured by the MELASQoL questionnaire, and adverse events.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the MASI or PGA scores, within or between groups. However, the study was underpowered (51% power) due to early termination and is thus considered a pilot. A transient increase in pigmentation intensity was observed in the TXA groups at week six. Despite the lack of clinical improvement, both groups sustained improvements in quality of life. The adverse events were mild, with PBM associated with warmth and TXA with a burning sensation. The absence of MASI reduction can be attributed to the elevated environmental temperatures during the study period, consistently above historical averages. In addition, both PBM and TXA may have limited efficacy in cases of chronic or dermal melasma.

CONCLUSION

Although no significant clinical changes were detected in MASI or PGA, both treatments improved the quality of life, highlighting the importance of patient-reported outcomes. Given the small sample size and potential environmental confounders-particularly elevated temperatures during the study period-definitive conclusions about treatment efficacy cannot be drawn. Future studies should consider optimized protocols and/or combination therapies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials No. NCT05326997, April 14th 2022.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估与外用氨甲环酸(TXA)相比,琥珀光生物调节疗法(PBM)治疗黄褐斑的疗效。

方法

在一项非劣效性随机对照试验中,21名女性被随机分为两组,一组接受使用安慰剂乳膏的活性PBM治疗(n = 10),另一组接受使用5%脂质体TXA乳膏的假PBM治疗(n = 11),为期12周。基于PBM可提供与TXA相当的疗效且不良反应较少的假设,选择了非劣效性研究。主要结局指标是黄褐斑面积和严重程度指数(MASI)。次要结局指标包括角质层黑素测定、医生整体评估(PGA)、用MELASQoL问卷测量的生活质量以及不良事件。

结果

在组内或组间,MASI或PGA评分均未观察到显著差异。然而,由于早期终止,该研究的检验效能不足(51%的效能),因此被视为一项试点研究。在第6周时,TXA组观察到色素沉着强度短暂增加。尽管缺乏临床改善,但两组的生活质量均持续改善。不良事件较轻,PBM与温热感相关,TXA与烧灼感相关。MASI未降低可归因于研究期间环境温度升高,持续高于历史平均水平。此外,PBM和TXA在慢性或真皮型黄褐斑病例中的疗效可能有限。

结论

尽管在MASI或PGA中未检测到显著的临床变化,但两种治疗均改善了生活质量,突出了患者报告结局的重要性。鉴于样本量小以及潜在的环境混杂因素,特别是研究期间温度升高,无法得出关于治疗疗效的明确结论。未来的研究应考虑优化方案和/或联合治疗。

试验注册

临床试验编号NCT05326997,2022年4月14日。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验