Wang Christina P, Guerra Lauren, Pantaleon Karisma, Goel Mita S, Harris Yael T, Wisnivesky Juan P, Lin Jenny J
Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2025 Jul 13:1-9. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2025.2528831.
Breast cancer survivors (BCS) are at risk of developing psychological distress associated with their cancer and are also more likely to experience comorbid diabetes mellitus (DM), which may worsen distress. Effective patient-physician communication is associated with increased psychological well-being, higher quality of life, and may prolong survival. We aimed to examine the association between race/ethnicity, patient-provider communication, and cancer-related distress in BCS with comorbid DM.
BCS with DM were surveyed using the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R) to assess for cancer-related post-traumatic stress (PTS) and the Patient Reactions Assessment (PRA) to assess their views of provider communications with their cancer (PRA-C) and DM providers (PRA-D). Bivariate analyses were conducted to examine the relationships between race/ethnicity, cancer-related PTS, and PRA scores. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to examine the relationship between PRA and IES-R scores by race/ethnicity.
A total of 181 female BCS with DM [mean (SD) age: 66.7 (7.0) years] who self-identified as White (39.8%), Black (32.0%), or Hispanic/Other (28.2%) were included. Non-White groups reported worse communication with their cancer ( = 0.01) but not with their DM providers ( = 0.09). BCS with cancer-related PTS had lower PRA-C scores ( = 0.04) but no difference in PRA-D scores ( = 0.22), versus those without cancer-related PTS. PRA-C and IES-R scores were significantly correlated, such that better communications with cancer ( = -0.23, = 0.01) but not DM providers ( = -0.13, = 0.08), were associated with lower IES-R scores. In subgroup analyses, the correlation between cancer-related PTS and PRA-C scores was significant in Hispanic/Other BCS ( = -0.39, = 0.01), in contrast to Black ( = -0.12, = 0.42) and White BCS ( = -0.09, = 0.49); no significant correlation was observed between cancer-related PTS and PRA-D scores by race/ethnicity.
Compared to White BCS, minoritized BCS with comorbid DM report less satisfaction in communications with their cancer providers, which is associated with higher levels of cancer-related distress.
乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)有患与癌症相关的心理困扰的风险,并且更有可能患合并糖尿病(DM),这可能会加重困扰。有效的医患沟通与心理健康状况改善、更高的生活质量相关,并且可能延长生存期。我们旨在研究合并DM的BCS中种族/民族、医患沟通与癌症相关困扰之间的关联。
使用事件影响量表修订版(IES-R)对合并DM的BCS进行调查,以评估与癌症相关的创伤后应激(PTS),并使用患者反应评估(PRA)来评估他们对医生与癌症相关沟通(PRA-C)和DM医生沟通(PRA-D)的看法。进行双变量分析以研究种族/民族、癌症相关PTS和PRA评分之间的关系。使用Pearson相关系数按种族/民族研究PRA与IES-R评分之间的关系。
共纳入181名自我认定为白人(39.8%)、黑人(32.0%)或西班牙裔/其他(28.2%)的合并DM的女性BCS [平均(标准差)年龄:66.7(7.0)岁]。非白人组报告与癌症医生的沟通较差(P = 0.01),但与DM医生的沟通无差异(P = 0.09)。与无癌症相关PTS的BCS相比,有癌症相关PTS的BCS的PRA-C评分较低(P = 0.04),但PRA-D评分无差异(P = 0.22)。PRA-C和IES-R评分显著相关,即与癌症医生的沟通较好(r = -0.23,P = 0.01)但与DM医生的沟通并非如此(r = -0.13,P = 0.08)与较低的IES-R评分相关。在亚组分析中,癌症相关PTS与PRA-C评分之间的相关性在西班牙裔/其他BCS中显著(r = -0.39,P = 0.01),与黑人(r = -0.12,P = 0.42)和白人BCS(r = -0.09,P = 0.49)形成对比;按种族/民族,癌症相关PTS与PRA-D评分之间未观察到显著相关性。
与白人BCS相比,合并DM的少数族裔BCS对与癌症医生的沟通满意度较低,这与更高水平的癌症相关困扰有关。