Lohman Hannah A C, Li Yalin, Zhang Xinyi, Morgan Victoria L, Watabe Shion, Rowles Lewis S, Cusick Roland D, Guest Jeremy S
The Grainger College of Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Jul 29;59(29):15101-15114. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c02064. Epub 2025 Jul 13.
Lack of access to sanitation is a challenge that persists globally, with low sewerage connection rates in many low- and lower-middle-income countries. Engineered nonsewered sanitation (NSS) technologies can meet treatment requirements without sewers, but their relative sustainability varies across potential deployment sites. Here, we characterize the costs and carbon intensity (CI) of three emerging NSS technologies, two community reinvented toilets (CRTs) and one Omni Processor (OP), across 77 countries, identify sustainability performance typologies, and map typology prevalence in countries across the globe. Locality-specific factors such as wages, diet, and material costs drive regional variability in NSS costs by up to 15-fold and CI up to 2-fold within technologies. Across all three NSS technologies and all scenarios evaluated, costs ranged from 0.01 to 0.36 USD·capita·day and CIs ranged from 8 to 269 kg CO eq·capita·year. Low-cost, low-CI typologies are predominantly in countries with lower human development indices (HDI 2-4), demonstrating alignment between the sanitation need and the NSS opportunity space. Ultimately, the intent of this work is not to imply one-size-fits-all solutions for individual countries; by elucidating key sustainability drivers and defining typologies, this work can support early-stage decision-making for NSS technology research, development, and deployment.
缺乏卫生设施是一个在全球持续存在的挑战,许多低收入和中低收入国家的污水处理连接率较低。工程化非下水道卫生设施(NSS)技术无需下水道就能满足处理要求,但其相对可持续性在不同的潜在部署地点有所不同。在此,我们描述了三种新兴NSS技术(两种社区改造厕所(CRT)和一种全能处理器(OP))在77个国家的成本和碳强度(CI),确定了可持续性绩效类型,并绘制了全球各国类型的流行情况。特定地点的因素,如工资、饮食和材料成本,使技术内部NSS成本的区域差异高达15倍,CI差异高达2倍。在所有三种NSS技术和所有评估情景中,成本范围为0.01至0.36美元·人均·天,CI范围为8至269千克二氧化碳当量·人均·年。低成本、低CI类型主要存在于人类发展指数较低的国家(HDI 2-4),这表明卫生需求与NSS机会空间之间的一致性。最终,这项工作的目的不是为个别国家暗示一刀切的解决方案;通过阐明关键的可持续性驱动因素并定义类型,这项工作可以支持NSS技术研究、开发和部署的早期决策。