Lee Tae Seung, Choi Young Hoon, Kim Jun Yeol, Lee Myeong Hwan, Paik Kyu-Hyun, Cho In Rae, Kwon Woo Il, Lee Sang Hyub, Lee In Seok, Lee Myung Ah, Jang Jin-Young, Ryu Ji Kon, Kim Yong-Tae, Paik Woo Hyun
Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Sep;40(9):2324-2334. doi: 10.1111/jgh.17044. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
The prognosis of biliary tract cancer (BTC) is poor, and recurrence rates remain high even after curative resection. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FL) as adjuvant treatments following curative resection in patients with BTC.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with BTC (including gallbladder and extrahepatic and intrahepatic bile duct cancers) who underwent curative surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy between 2011 and 2023. The recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events were investigated between the two groups.
Of the 263 patients, 85 and 178 received capecitabine and FL, respectively. The recurrence-free survival and overall survival did not show statistically significant differences between the capecitabine and FL groups. After propensity score matching, the capecitabine group showed significantly longer overall survival (median, NA [52 - NA] vs. 43 months [32 - NA], p = 0.032). Although severe adverse events did not differ between both groups (29.4% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.135), overall adverse events, including anemia, thrombocytopenia, hand-foot syndrome, and skin color change, were significantly more frequent in the capecitabine group (90.6% vs. 57.9%, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, severe adverse events (30.3% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.032) and overall adverse events (90.8% vs. 65.8%, p < 0.001) were significantly more frequent in the capecitabine group.
In patients with curatively resected BTC, capecitabine demonstrated superior efficacy in prolonging overall survival, whereas FL had a more favorable safety profile with fewer adverse events.
胆管癌(BTC)的预后较差,即使在根治性切除术后复发率仍居高不下。本研究旨在比较卡培他滨与5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙(FL)作为BTC患者根治性切除术后辅助治疗的疗效和安全性。
我们回顾性分析了2011年至2023年间接受根治性手术切除及辅助化疗的BTC患者(包括胆囊癌、肝外胆管癌和肝内胆管癌)的病历。研究了两组患者的无复发生存期、总生存期及不良事件。
263例患者中,85例接受卡培他滨治疗,178例接受FL治疗。卡培他滨组与FL组的无复发生存期和总生存期无统计学显著差异。倾向评分匹配后,卡培他滨组的总生存期显著延长(中位数,未获得数据[52 - 未获得数据] vs. 43个月[32 - 未获得数据],p = 0.032)。虽然两组严重不良事件发生率无差异(29.4% vs. 20.2%,p = 0.135),但卡培他滨组包括贫血、血小板减少、手足综合征和皮肤颜色改变在内的总体不良事件明显更频繁(90.6% vs. 57.9%,p < 0.001)。倾向评分匹配后,卡培他滨组的严重不良事件(30.3% vs. 14.5%,p = 0.032)和总体不良事件(90.8% vs. 65.8%,p < 0.001)明显更频繁。
在接受根治性切除的BTC患者中,卡培他滨在延长总生存期方面显示出更好的疗效,而FL的安全性更好,不良事件更少。