Suppr超能文献

5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙与卡培他滨作为胆管癌辅助治疗的比较

Comparison of 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin and Capecitabine as Adjuvant Therapies in Biliary Tract Cancer.

作者信息

Lee Tae Seung, Choi Young Hoon, Kim Jun Yeol, Lee Myeong Hwan, Paik Kyu-Hyun, Cho In Rae, Kwon Woo Il, Lee Sang Hyub, Lee In Seok, Lee Myung Ah, Jang Jin-Young, Ryu Ji Kon, Kim Yong-Tae, Paik Woo Hyun

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Sep;40(9):2324-2334. doi: 10.1111/jgh.17044. Epub 2025 Jul 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of biliary tract cancer (BTC) is poor, and recurrence rates remain high even after curative resection. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FL) as adjuvant treatments following curative resection in patients with BTC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with BTC (including gallbladder and extrahepatic and intrahepatic bile duct cancers) who underwent curative surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy between 2011 and 2023. The recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events were investigated between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 263 patients, 85 and 178 received capecitabine and FL, respectively. The recurrence-free survival and overall survival did not show statistically significant differences between the capecitabine and FL groups. After propensity score matching, the capecitabine group showed significantly longer overall survival (median, NA [52 - NA] vs. 43 months [32 - NA], p = 0.032). Although severe adverse events did not differ between both groups (29.4% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.135), overall adverse events, including anemia, thrombocytopenia, hand-foot syndrome, and skin color change, were significantly more frequent in the capecitabine group (90.6% vs. 57.9%, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, severe adverse events (30.3% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.032) and overall adverse events (90.8% vs. 65.8%, p < 0.001) were significantly more frequent in the capecitabine group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with curatively resected BTC, capecitabine demonstrated superior efficacy in prolonging overall survival, whereas FL had a more favorable safety profile with fewer adverse events.

摘要

背景

胆管癌(BTC)的预后较差,即使在根治性切除术后复发率仍居高不下。本研究旨在比较卡培他滨与5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙(FL)作为BTC患者根治性切除术后辅助治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2011年至2023年间接受根治性手术切除及辅助化疗的BTC患者(包括胆囊癌、肝外胆管癌和肝内胆管癌)的病历。研究了两组患者的无复发生存期、总生存期及不良事件。

结果

263例患者中,85例接受卡培他滨治疗,178例接受FL治疗。卡培他滨组与FL组的无复发生存期和总生存期无统计学显著差异。倾向评分匹配后,卡培他滨组的总生存期显著延长(中位数,未获得数据[52 - 未获得数据] vs. 43个月[32 - 未获得数据],p = 0.032)。虽然两组严重不良事件发生率无差异(29.4% vs. 20.2%,p = 0.135),但卡培他滨组包括贫血、血小板减少、手足综合征和皮肤颜色改变在内的总体不良事件明显更频繁(90.6% vs. 57.9%,p < 0.001)。倾向评分匹配后,卡培他滨组的严重不良事件(30.3% vs. 14.5%,p = 0.032)和总体不良事件(90.8% vs. 65.8%,p < 0.001)明显更频繁。

结论

在接受根治性切除的BTC患者中,卡培他滨在延长总生存期方面显示出更好的疗效,而FL的安全性更好,不良事件更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6263/12400249/569bc42397c3/JGH-40-2324-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin and Capecitabine as Adjuvant Therapies in Biliary Tract Cancer.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Sep;40(9):2324-2334. doi: 10.1111/jgh.17044. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
2
Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 6;4(4):CD011746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011746.pub2.
6
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable cholangiocarcinoma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 13;9(9):CD012814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012814.pub2.
7
A systematic overview of chemotherapy effects in colorectal cancer.
Acta Oncol. 2001;40(2-3):282-308. doi: 10.1080/02841860151116367.

本文引用的文献

1
The significance of peri-neural invasion in patients with gallbladder carcinoma after curative surgery: a 10 year experience in China.
Updates Surg. 2023 Aug;75(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01519-2. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
3
Postoperative Prognostic Predictors of Bile Duct Cancers: Clinical Analysis and Immunoassays of Tissue Microarrays.
Gut Liver. 2023 Jan 15;17(1):159-169. doi: 10.5009/gnl220044. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
4
Long-Term Outcomes and Exploratory Analyses of the Randomized Phase III BILCAP Study.
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 20;40(18):2048-2057. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02568. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
6
Combination therapy of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF-mutated biliary tract cancer.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2021 Oct;20(5):506-507. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.12.010. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
7
Circulating Tumor DNA in Biliary Tract Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.
Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2020 Sep-Oct;17(5):441-452. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20203.
8
Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Sep;17(9):557-588. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0310-z. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
9
New Treatment Options for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020 Jun 29;21(8):63. doi: 10.1007/s11864-020-00767-3.
10
Systemic therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
J Hepatol. 2020 Feb;72(2):353-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.009.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验