• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆管癌根治性切除术后的术后辅助化疗和化疗免疫治疗:一项回顾性研究。

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy after radical resection for biliary tract cancer: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Peng Yuhuai, Xia Guoyi, Li Yufeng, Zhou Jia, Liu Sulai, Peng Chuang, Tao Yuewei, Li Ou, Song Yinghui

机构信息

Central Laboratory, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, P. R. China.

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, P. R. China.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2025 Jun 4;30(6). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf163.

DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf163
PMID:40452387
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12203059/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The prognosis of biliary tract cancers (BTC) after radical resection is still unsatisfactory. However, the clinical value of adjuvant therapy remains controversial. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in patients with BTC after radical resection.

METHODS

Data from BTC patients who underwent radical resection were retrospectively obtained from Hunan Provincial People's Hospital between January 2020 and July 2024. Patients were divided into observation group, adjuvant chemotherapy group, and adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group according to the treatment received by the patient after surgery. Survival curves were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. The COX proportional hazards regression model was used to determine independent prognostic risk factors. The adjuvant chemotherapy group and adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group were analyzed by PSM at a 1:1 ratio.

RESULTS

A total of 219 patients with BTC were reenrolled in this study, with 108 cases of iCCA, 39 cases of pCCA, 15 cases of DCCA, and 57 cases of GBC. Eighty-seven patients (39.73%) received surgery alone, 69 patients (31.51%) received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and 63 patients (28.77%) received postoperative adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. There was no different significance for median recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the 3 groups (13.20 vs 20.40 vs 19.68 months; P = .195). The median overall survival (OS) was the longest in the chemoimmunotherapy group (29.20 vs 31.5 vs 43.27 months; P = .003). After propensity score matching (PSM), there was no difference in median RFS in the 2 adjuvant groups (22.03 vs 19.87 months; P = .350). The median OS was longer in the chemoimmunotherapy group (45.27 vs 29.40 months; P = .015). In Cox analysis, lymph node metastasis, differentiation, and adjuvant treatment were the independent predictors of OS in patients with BTC. The most common adverse events were of any grade of hematologic toxicity. No drug-related deaths occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety of chemoimmunotherapy was acceptable and could significantly prolong the overall survival of BTC. These data provided a basis for an additional prospective clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in adjuvant therapy for BTC.

摘要

背景与目的

根治性切除术后胆道癌(BTC)的预后仍不尽人意。然而,辅助治疗的临床价值仍存在争议。本回顾性研究旨在评估辅助化疗和辅助化疗免疫疗法在根治性切除术后BTC患者中的临床价值。

方法

回顾性收集2020年1月至2024年7月在湖南省人民医院接受根治性切除的BTC患者的数据。根据患者术后接受的治疗将患者分为观察组、辅助化疗组和辅助化疗免疫治疗组。采用Kaplan-Meier法确定生存曲线。使用COX比例风险回归模型确定独立的预后危险因素。辅助化疗组和辅助化疗免疫治疗组按1:1的比例进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析。

结果

本研究共纳入219例BTC患者,其中肝内胆管癌(iCCA)108例,肝门部胆管癌(pCCA)39例,远端胆管癌(DCCA)15例,胆囊癌(GBC)57例。87例患者(39.73%)仅接受手术治疗,69例患者(31.51%)接受术后辅助化疗,63例患者(28.77%)接受术后辅助化疗免疫治疗。三组的中位无复发生存期(RFS)无差异(13.20个月vs 20.40个月vs 19.68个月;P = 0.195)。化疗免疫治疗组的中位总生存期(OS)最长(29.20个月vs 31.5个月vs 43.27个月;P = 0.003)。倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,两个辅助治疗组的中位RFS无差异(22.03个月vs 19.87个月;P = 0.350)。化疗免疫治疗组的中位OS更长(45.27个月vs 29.个月;P = 0.015)。在Cox分析中,淋巴结转移、分化程度和辅助治疗是BTC患者OS的独立预测因素。最常见的不良事件是任何级别的血液学毒性。两组均未发生与药物相关的死亡。

结论

化疗免疫治疗的安全性可接受,且能显著延长BTC患者的总生存期。这些数据为进一步开展前瞻性临床试验以评估化疗免疫疗法在BTC辅助治疗中的疗效提供了依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/12203059/c985c26e0f72/oyaf163_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/12203059/7af9047c4376/oyaf163_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/12203059/92bed5bd655b/oyaf163_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/12203059/c985c26e0f72/oyaf163_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/12203059/7af9047c4376/oyaf163_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/12203059/92bed5bd655b/oyaf163_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6839/12203059/c985c26e0f72/oyaf163_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy after radical resection for biliary tract cancer: a retrospective study.胆管癌根治性切除术后的术后辅助化疗和化疗免疫治疗:一项回顾性研究。
Oncologist. 2025 Jun 4;30(6). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf163.
2
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer operated for cure.针对接受根治性手术的直肠癌患者的术后辅助化疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD004078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004078.pub2.
3
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
4
[Comparison of the efficacy of anatomical resection versus hepatic parenchymal preservation preference in patients with solitary small hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis: a multicenter retrospective study].[孤立性小肝细胞癌合并肝硬化患者解剖性切除与肝实质保留优先策略疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性研究]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2025 Apr 20;33(4):348-358. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20250315-00097.
5
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable cholangiocarcinoma.可切除胆管癌的术后辅助化疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 13;9(9):CD012814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012814.pub2.
8
The use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.伊立替康、奥沙利铂和雷替曲塞用于治疗晚期结直肠癌:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(15):iii-ix, xi-162. doi: 10.3310/hta12150.
9
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
10
Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas.基于吉西他滨的晚期胆管癌化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 6;4(4):CD011746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011746.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
IL-8-NF-κB-ALDH1A1 loop promotes the progression of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.白细胞介素-8-核因子-κB-醛脱氢酶1A1环路促进肝内胆管癌进展。
Hepatol Commun. 2025 Feb 26;9(3). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000664. eCollection 2025 Mar 1.
2
Comparing Immunotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone as Second-Line Therapy for Malignant Tumors of the Biliary Tract: A Retrospective Study.比较免疫疗法与单纯化疗作为胆道恶性肿瘤二线治疗的疗效:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2025 Feb 16;19:11795549251317012. doi: 10.1177/11795549251317012. eCollection 2025.
3
The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for curative resected biliary tract cancers: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
根治性切除的胆道癌辅助化疗疗效:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Int J Surg. 2025 Feb 1;111(2):2182-2194. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002161.
4
EGFR, HER2, and MET gene amplification and protein expression profiles in biliary tract cancer and their prognostic significance.胆道癌中 EGFR、HER2 和 MET 基因扩增和蛋白表达谱及其预后意义。
Oncologist. 2024 Aug 5;29(8):e1051-e1060. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae076.
5
Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.度伐利尤单抗联合吉西他滨和顺铂治疗晚期胆管癌(TOPAZ-1):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照3期试验的患者报告结局
Lancet Oncol. 2024 May;25(5):626-635. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00082-2.
6
Biliary tract cancers: French national clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, UNICANCER, GERCOR, SFCD, SFED, AFEF, SFRO, SFP, SFR, ACABi, ACHBPT).胆道癌:法国国家临床实践指南,用于诊断、治疗和随访(TNCD、SNFGE、FFCD、UNICANCER、GERCOR、SFCD、SFED、AFEF、SFRO、SFP、SFR、ACABi、ACHBPT)。
Eur J Cancer. 2024 May;202:114000. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114000. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
7
Immunotherapy for the treatment of biliary tract cancer: an evolving landscape.用于治疗胆管癌的免疫疗法:不断演变的格局。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Mar 5;16:17588359241235799. doi: 10.1177/17588359241235799. eCollection 2024.
8
Adjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in patients with cholangiocarcinoma after radical resection.根治性切除术后辅助化疗联合免疫治疗胆管癌患者。
Cancer Med. 2023 Dec;12(24):21742-21750. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6738. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
9
Development of a nomogram to predict survival in advanced biliary tract cancer.开发一个列线图预测晚期胆道癌的生存情况。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 6;13(1):21548. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48889-6.
10
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Biliary Tract Cancers, Version 2.2023.NCCN 指南®洞察:胆道癌,第 2.2023 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Jul;21(7):694-704. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0035.