Pintilie Grigore, Shao Chenghua, Wang Zhe, Hudson Brian P, Flatt Justin W, Schmid Michael F, Morris Kyle L, Burley Stephen K, Chiu Wah
Departments of Bioengineering and of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2025 Aug 1;81(Pt 8):410-422. doi: 10.1107/S2059798325005923. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
Atomic coordinate models are important for the interpretation of 3D maps produced with cryoEM and cryoET (3D electron microscopy; 3DEM). In addition to visual inspection of such maps and models, quantitative metrics can inform about the reliability of the atomic coordinates, in particular how well the model is supported by the experimentally determined 3DEM map. A recently introduced metric, Q-score, was shown to correlate well with the reported resolution of the map for well fitted models. Here, we present new statistical analyses of Q-score based on its application to ∼10 000 maps and models archived in the EMDB (Electron Microscopy Data Bank) and PDB (Protein Data Bank). Further, we introduce two new metrics based on Q-score to represent each map and model relative to all entries in the EMDB and those with similar resolution. We explore through illustrative examples of proteins, nucleic acids and small molecules how Q-scores can indicate whether the atomic coordinates are well fitted to 3DEM maps and also whether some parts of a map may be poorly resolved due to factors such as molecular flexibility, radiation damage and/or conformational heterogeneity. These examples and statistical analyses provide a basis for how Q-scores can be interpreted effectively in order to evaluate 3DEM maps and atomic coordinate models prior to publication and archiving.
原子坐标模型对于解释通过冷冻电镜(cryoEM)和冷冻电子断层扫描(cryoET,三维电子显微镜;3DEM)生成的三维图谱非常重要。除了对这些图谱和模型进行目视检查外,定量指标还可以反映原子坐标的可靠性,特别是模型在实验确定的3DEM图谱中的支持程度。最近引入的一个指标Q分数,对于拟合良好的模型,它与报道的图谱分辨率具有良好的相关性。在这里,我们基于Q分数在电子显微镜数据库(EMDB)和蛋白质数据库(PDB)中存档的约10000个图谱和模型上的应用,提出了新的统计分析。此外,我们基于Q分数引入了两个新指标,以相对于EMDB中的所有条目以及具有相似分辨率的条目来表示每个图谱和模型。我们通过蛋白质、核酸和小分子的示例,探讨Q分数如何能够表明原子坐标是否与3DEM图谱拟合良好,以及由于分子柔性、辐射损伤和/或构象异质性等因素,图谱的某些部分是否可能分辨率较差。这些示例和统计分析为如何有效解释Q分数提供了基础,以便在发表和存档之前评估3DEM图谱和原子坐标模型。