美国2020年后晚期卵巢癌患者的真实世界一线维持治疗模式
Real-world post-2020 first-line maintenance treatment patterns in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the US.
作者信息
Chase Dana M, Kalilani Linda, Cooney Maureen A, Kiss Zsofia, Golembesky Amanda K, Kobayashi Monica, Dayma Megha, Coskuncay Elif, Schilder Jeanne M
机构信息
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
GSK, Durham, NC, USA.
出版信息
Future Oncol. 2025 Aug;21(19):2495-2503. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2526273. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
AIMS
To describe first-line maintenance (1LM) treatment patterns since 1 January 2020, for real-world patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (aOC).
PATIENTS & METHODS: This retrospective study used a US-nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years with stage III/IV epithelial OC and initiated first-line platinum-based chemotherapy±bevacizumab (index; 01Jan2020-28Feb2023). Baseline characteristics and 1LM treatment patterns were summarized overall and by status.
RESULTS
Among 599 eligible patients (median [interquartile range] age, 67 [59-74] years; 59.8% White; 50.3% stage III disease), 15.5% had -mutated (m), 72.3% wild-type (wt), and 12.2% unknown status. Overall, 289 patients (48.2%) received 1LM therapy (poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor [PARPi] monotherapy, 23.4%; bevacizumab monotherapy, 14.7%; bevacizumab+PARPi, 7.8%; other therapies, 2.3%). PARPi monotherapy was most common among patients with m (47.3%) versus wt (21.7%) or unknown (2.7%) status. The same was true for 1LM bevacizumab+PARPi (m, 16.1%; wt, 7.4%; unknown, 0%). Bevacizumab monotherapy was most common among patients with wt (18.7%) versus m (3.2%) or unknown (5.5%) status.
CONCLUSIONS
Fewer than half of included patients with aOC received 1LM treatment in the real-world setting. More work is needed to understand reasons underlying real-world 1LM treatment choice for patients with aOC.
目的
描述自2020年1月1日起新诊断的晚期卵巢癌(aOC)真实世界患者的一线维持(1LM)治疗模式。
患者与方法
这项回顾性研究使用了一个源自美国全国电子健康记录的去识别数据库。符合条件的患者年龄≥18岁,患有III/IV期上皮性卵巢癌,并开始一线铂类化疗±贝伐单抗(索引;2020年1月1日至2023年2月28日)。总体及按状态总结了基线特征和1LM治疗模式。
结果
在599例符合条件的患者中(中位[四分位间距]年龄,67[59 - 74]岁;59.8%为白人;50.3%为III期疾病),15.5%具有 - 突变(m),72.3%为野生型(wt),12.2%的 状态未知。总体而言,289例患者(48.2%)接受了1LM治疗(聚(ADP - 核糖)聚合酶抑制剂[PARPi]单药治疗,23.4%;贝伐单抗单药治疗,14.7%;贝伐单抗 + PARPi,7.8%;其他治疗,2.3%)。PARPi单药治疗在具有m状态的患者中最为常见(47.3%),而野生型(21.7%)或状态未知(2.7%)的患者中则不然。1LM贝伐单抗 + PARPi情况相同(m,16.1%;wt,7.4%;未知,0%)。贝伐单抗单药治疗在野生型患者中最为常见(18.7%),而m状态(3.2%)或状态未知(5.5%)的患者中则不然。
结论
在真实世界中,纳入的aOC患者中接受1LM治疗的不到一半。需要开展更多工作来了解aOC患者真实世界1LM治疗选择背后的原因。
相似文献
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-9-26
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024-7-8
本文引用的文献
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023-4