• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Blended Learning in Bachelor's Nursing Education: Exploring Student Experiences, Satisfaction, and Knowledge.护理学学士学位教育中的混合式学习:探索学生体验、满意度与知识掌握情况
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Jul 9;16:1197-1207. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S520500. eCollection 2025.
2
Blended learning vs traditional teaching: The potential of a novel teaching strategy in nursing education - a systematic review and meta-analysis.混合式学习与传统教学:一种新型教学策略在护理教育中的潜力——系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Aug;63:103354. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103354. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
3
Whether case-based teaching combined with the flipped classroom is more valuable than traditional lecture-based teaching methods in clinical medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在临床医学教育中,基于案例的教学与翻转课堂相结合是否比传统的基于讲座的教学方法更具价值:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07465-4.
4
Empowering future nurses: enhancing self-efficacy, satisfaction, and academic achievement through talent management educational intervention.赋能未来护士:通过人才管理教育干预提高自我效能感、满意度和学业成绩。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 7;24(1):875. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03512-z.
5
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
6
Investigation of Learning and Employment Status in the Undergraduate Education of Speech Rehabilitation in Mainland China.中国大陆言语康复本科教育的学习与就业状况调查
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70087. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70087.
7
Experiences Using Media Health Claims to Teach Evidence-Based Practice to Healthcare Students: A Mixed Methods Study.利用媒体健康声明来教授医疗保健学生循证实践的经验:一项混合方法研究。
F1000Res. 2025 Jan 28;13:224. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.146648.2. eCollection 2024.
8
Medical education under siege: the war's impact on medical and paramedical Sudanese students.医学教育受困:战争对苏丹医科及医护专业学生的影响
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):861. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07457-4.
9
Effects of blended learning on undergraduate nursing students' knowledge, skills, critical thinking ability and mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.混合式学习对本科护生知识、技能、批判性思维能力和心理健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Oct;72:103786. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103786. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
10
The Effectiveness of a Question-Embedded Movie Clips Learning Program in Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Pretest-Posttest Study.问题嵌入电影片段学习计划对护理专业学生的有效性:一项准实验性前后测研究。
JMIR Nurs. 2025 Jul 8;8:e71111. doi: 10.2196/71111.

本文引用的文献

1
Acceptance or satisfaction of blended learning among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review of the literature.本科护理专业学生对混合式学习的接受度或满意度:文献系统综述
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Apr;147:106589. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106589. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
Effects of blended learning on undergraduate nursing students' knowledge, skills, critical thinking ability and mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.混合式学习对本科护生知识、技能、批判性思维能力和心理健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Oct;72:103786. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103786. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
3
Blended learning versus face-to-face learning in an undergraduate nursing health assessment course: A quasi-experimental study.本科护理学健康评估课程中混合学习与面对面学习的比较:一项准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jan;96:104622. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104622. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
4
Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.混合式学习与医学教育中的传统学习比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 10;22(8):e16504. doi: 10.2196/16504.
5
A systematic review of the factors - enablers and barriers - affecting e-learning in health sciences education.一项系统综述,分析影响健康科学教育中电子学习的因素——促进因素和障碍。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6.
6
The effects of blended learning on knowledge, skills, and satisfaction in nursing students: A meta-analysis.混合式学习对护生知识、技能和满意度的影响:Meta 分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Nov;82:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
7
Online learning versus blended learning of clinical supervisee skills with pre-registration nursing students: A randomised controlled trial.在线学习与混合学习临床带教技能对注册前护理学生的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jun;82:30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
8
Investigation of blended learning video resources to teach health students clinical skills: An integrative review.调查混合学习视频资源以教授健康专业学生临床技能:综合评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Apr;63:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
9
Blended learning pedagogy designed for communication module among undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study.为本科护理专业学生交流模块设计的混合式学习教学法:一项准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Feb;61:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
10
Face-to-face instruction combined with online resources improves retention of clinical skills among undergraduate nursing students.面对面教学与在线资源相结合可提高本科护理专业学生临床技能的保持率。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Feb;61:15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Nov 9.

护理学学士学位教育中的混合式学习:探索学生体验、满意度与知识掌握情况

Blended Learning in Bachelor's Nursing Education: Exploring Student Experiences, Satisfaction, and Knowledge.

作者信息

Abusabeib Zeinab A

机构信息

Department of Community and Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Jul 9;16:1197-1207. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S520500. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S520500
PMID:40657036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12256046/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blended learning merges in-person instruction with online education, offering flexible and individualized learning experiences. This approach is especially valuable in nursing education, where connecting theoretical knowledge with practical application is crucial.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to investigate nursing students' experiences and satisfaction levels regarding blended learning in a Clinical Nutrition Course targeted at third-year nursing students while comparing the knowledge outcomes of blended learning and traditional learning groups.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study design was utilized to evaluate the experiences of 307 female nursing students through the Web-based Learning Environment Instrument (WEBLEI). Data were collected online using a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed with descriptive statistics. Moreover, academic performance between the blended learning group (2024-2025) and the traditional group (2023-2024) was compared using independent t-tests.

RESULTS

Students reported a high level of satisfaction with blended learning, evident from the overall WEBLEI scores. Scores for Access (4.48), Interaction (4.40), Response (4.59), and Results (4.64) indicated favorable views regarding flexibility, engagement, and knowledge gain. The blended learning group exhibited significantly better academic performance (Total Score: 94.39 ± 4.78) compared to the traditional group (89.21 ± 5.39; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Blended learning significantly improves both student satisfaction and academic performance in nursing education. Enhancing peer interaction and incorporating additional synchronous activities could further enhance the blended learning approach.

摘要

背景

混合式学习将面授教学与在线教育相结合,提供灵活且个性化的学习体验。这种方法在护理教育中尤其有价值,因为将理论知识与实际应用相联系至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在调查护理专业三年级学生在临床营养课程中对混合式学习的体验和满意度,同时比较混合式学习组和传统学习组的知识成果。

方法

采用横断面研究设计,通过基于网络的学习环境工具(WEBLEI)评估307名女护理学生的体验。使用5点李克特量表在线收集数据,并进行描述性统计分析。此外,使用独立t检验比较混合式学习组(2024 - 2025年)和传统组(2023 - 2024年)的学业成绩。

结果

学生对混合式学习满意度较高,这从整体WEBLEI分数中可见一斑。访问(4.48)、互动(4.40)、反馈(4.59)和成果(4.64)方面的分数表明,学生对灵活性、参与度和知识获取持积极看法。与传统组(89.21 ± 5.39;p < 0.001)相比,混合式学习组的学业成绩明显更好(总分:94.39 ± 4.78)。

结论

混合式学习显著提高了护理教育中学生的满意度和学业成绩。加强同伴互动并纳入更多同步活动可进一步提升混合式学习方法。