Perez Megan M, Hassan Taaha, Hackenberger Paige N, Dumanian Gregory A, Shapiro Michael
Division of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Hernia. 2025 Jul 14;29(1):232. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03409-5.
The optimal technique for rectus diastasis (RD) repair, particularly when a ventral hernia is present, remains undefined. Mesh suture is a novel device designed to resist suture pull-through in high-tension closures. This study evaluates the technical feasibility and early outcomes of mesh suture use for linea alba plication during open abdominoplasty, with and without concurrent ventral hernia repair.
A retrospective review of consecutive cases of abdominoplasty with mesh suture linea alba plication was performed between January 2023–2025. Patients who underwent concurrent procedures (hernia repairs, hysterectomies, and tumor excisions) were included. Patients were excluded if planar mesh was used.
Forty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. The average BMI was 26.6 and mean age was 47.9 years. The mean RD width was 5.0 cm. 51% of patients had an existing preoperative ventral hernia and 61.7% of patients underwent a concurrent procedure. Most patients had a standard low transverse incision (68.1%). There was one superficial infection (2.1%), four seromas (8.5%), one hematoma (2.1%), and four soft tissue breakdowns (8.5%). There were no chronic draining sinuses, fistulae, chronic pain, or suture palpability reported. There was one early hernia recurrence (4.2%) among a patient with a preoperative hernia.
Mesh suture appears to be a feasible option for RD plication in patients undergoing abdominoplasty with and without concurrent hernia repair or other abdominal procedures and was associated with low short-term complication rates in this small, single-surgeon series. These early findings, while encouraging, reflect a heterogenous and limited cohort, and follow up was insufficient to assess long-term recurrence, particularly in patients with hernias > 1 cm. As an initial feasibility study, this work supports further investigation in larger, well-controlled cohorts, ideally stratified by hernia size and with prospective, long-term follow up, to evaluate the durability, safety, and generalizability compared to standard practices.
腹直肌分离(RD)修复的最佳技术,尤其是存在腹疝时,仍不明确。网片缝合是一种新型装置,旨在抵抗高张力缝合中的缝线拉出。本研究评估了在开放式腹壁成形术中使用网片缝合进行白线折叠术的技术可行性和早期结果,无论是否同时进行腹疝修复。
对2023年1月至2025年期间连续进行网片缝合白线折叠术的腹壁成形术病例进行回顾性研究。纳入同时进行其他手术(疝修补术、子宫切除术和肿瘤切除术)的患者。如果使用平面网片则排除患者。
47例患者符合纳入标准。平均体重指数为26.6 ,平均年龄为47.9岁。平均RD宽度为5.0厘米。51%的患者术前存在腹疝,61.7% 的患者同时进行了其他手术。大多数患者采用标准的低位横切口(68.1%)。有1例浅表感染(2.1%)、4例血清肿(8.5%)、1例血肿(2.1%)和4例软组织裂开(8.5%)。未报告慢性引流窦、瘘管、慢性疼痛或缝线可触及情况。术前有疝的患者中有1例早期疝复发(4.2%)。
对于接受或未接受同时疝修补或其他腹部手术的腹壁成形术患者,网片缝合似乎是RD折叠术的一种可行选择,在这个小型单医生系列研究中,其短期并发症发生率较低。这些早期发现虽然令人鼓舞,但反映的是一个异质性且有限的队列,随访不足以评估长期复发情况,特别是对于疝大于1厘米的患者。作为一项初步可行性研究,本研究支持在更大、控制良好的队列中进行进一步研究,理想情况下按疝大小分层,并进行前瞻性长期随访,以评估与标准做法相比的耐久性、安全性和可推广性。