Tehranchi Kian, Patell Rushad, Bindal Poorva, Dodge Laura, Freed Jason, Buss Mary, Schonberg Mara A, Braun Ilana, Rangachari Deepa
Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
J Cannabis Res. 2025 Jul 14;7(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s42238-025-00293-9.
Medical cannabis consumption is rising, but limited evidence informs the safety and efficacy of cannabis use in cancer patients. A national survey of oncology trainees found that most fellows felt insufficiently informed to make clinical recommendations about cannabis.
In this secondary analysis, we aimed to measure how frequently trainees recommend in favor of cannabis and determine factors influencing this clinical practice.
In this cross-sectional survey study for fellows enrolled in oncology training programs across the United States, an online survey assessing trainee practices regarding medical cannabis was sent to 155 oncology fellowship program directors from January - March 2021; who were asked to distribute it to their fellows. The primary outcome was the frequency with which oncology fellows recommended cannabis in the prior year.
Nationally, 40 programs from 25 states participated, with 189 of 462 trainees across these programs responding (40.9% response rate). 22% (95% CI: 16.3-29.0%) of participants reported recommending medical cannabis to > 5 patients in the past year. 24% (95% CI: 18.4-30.5%) of participants had prior training in medical cannabis. Regarding participant characteristics, only prior training in medical cannabis was significantly associated with recommending cannabis to > 5 patients (RR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.4-4.2).
With increasing cannabis use among patients with cancer and given that a substantial number of oncology fellows recommend its use, it is crucial that fellowship training incorporate evidence-based curricula regarding medical cannabis use to guide informed decision-making between patients and their fellow providers.
医用大麻的使用正在增加,但关于大麻在癌症患者中使用的安全性和有效性的证据有限。一项针对肿瘤学实习生的全国性调查发现,大多数研究员认为自己获得的信息不足以就大麻做出临床推荐。
在这项二次分析中,我们旨在衡量实习生推荐使用大麻的频率,并确定影响这种临床实践的因素。
在这项针对美国各地肿瘤学培训项目研究员的横断面调查研究中,2021年1月至3月向155名肿瘤学 fellowship 项目主任发送了一项评估实习生关于医用大麻实践的在线调查;要求他们将其分发给他们的研究员。主要结果是肿瘤学研究员在前一年推荐使用大麻的频率。
在全国范围内,来自25个州的40个项目参与其中,这些项目中的462名实习生中有189名做出了回应(回应率为40.9%)。22%(95%置信区间:16.3 - 29.0%)的参与者报告在过去一年中向超过5名患者推荐了医用大麻。24%(95%置信区间:18.4 - 30.5%)的参与者曾接受过大麻医学培训。关于参与者特征,只有大麻医学方面的先前培训与向超过5名患者推荐大麻有显著关联(相对风险:2.4;95%置信区间:1.4 - 4.2)。
鉴于癌症患者中大麻使用的增加,并且鉴于大量肿瘤学研究员推荐使用大麻,至关重要的是 fellowship 培训应纳入关于医用大麻使用的循证课程,以指导患者及其医疗服务提供者之间的明智决策。