Moradoghli Fereshteh, Aghaei Mir Hossein, Hakimi Mohammad Hossein, Ghadimi Saeid, Ebrahimoghli Reza
Department of Nursing, Institute of Health Education, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jul 16;56(1):154. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01274-0.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major global health burden with higher mortality rate in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is well established that CRC screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality. However, data regarding uptake of CRC screening remains scarce in LMICs. Therefore, we aimed to quantify uptake of CRC screening in LMICs.
We searched for scientific literature published in any language using four online databases (Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Knowledge) from their inception to 1 August 2024. We included observational studies reporting the prevalence of uptake of CRC screening modalities in LMICs. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity.
Sixty-nine studies encompassing data from 19 LMICs were eligible for final inclusion in this systematic review. The pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of screening colonoscopy was 5.2% (95% CI, 3.1-7.8). The pooled proportion of individuals who self-reported undertaking screening gFOBT was 11.5% (95% CI, 8.2-15.3). Pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of any CRC screening modalities was 9.1% (95% CI, 6.2-12.5). Subgroup analyses showed that uptake of CRC screening did not vary significantly across available study-level variables.
This meta-analysis revealed low colorectal cancer screening rates, impeding early detection at the population level. LMICs should prioritize context-specific strategies to improve screening uptake.
结直肠癌(CRC)仍然是一项重大的全球健康负担,在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的死亡率更高。众所周知,CRC筛查可降低CRC的发病率和死亡率。然而,关于LMICs中CRC筛查接受情况的数据仍然很少。因此,我们旨在量化LMICs中CRC筛查的接受情况。
我们使用四个在线数据库(Scopus、Embase、PubMed和Web of Knowledge)检索了从数据库建立到2024年8月1日以任何语言发表的科学文献。我们纳入了报告LMICs中CRC筛查方式接受率的观察性研究。采用随机效应模型估计合并患病率及其95%置信区间(CIs)。亚组分析和meta回归用于调查异质性的潜在来源。
69项涵盖19个LMICs数据的研究符合最终纳入本系统评价的条件。自我报告的筛查结肠镜检查接受率的合并患病率为5.2%(95%CI,3.1 - 7.8)。自我报告进行粪便潜血试验(gFOBT)筛查的个体合并比例为11.5%(95%CI,8.2 - 15.3)。自我报告的任何CRC筛查方式接受率的合并患病率为9.1%(95%CI,6.2 - 12.5)。亚组分析表明,CRC筛查的接受情况在现有的研究水平变量中没有显著差异。
这项meta分析显示结直肠癌筛查率较低,阻碍了人群水平的早期发现。LMICs应优先制定因地制宜的策略,以提高筛查接受率。