• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

清晰视野,显著节省:提高微创手术效率

Clear Vision, Clear Savings: Enhancing Efficiency in Minimally Invasive Surgery.

作者信息

Dhingra Juslyn, Beinart Noah, Ahmed Abraar, Patel Mansi, Ameerah Aysha, Srinivasan Maansi, Idelson Christopher R, Uecker John M

机构信息

The College of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. (Ms. Dhingra, Ms. Patel, Mr. Ahmed, and Ms. Ameerah).

The McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. (Mr. Beinart).

出版信息

JSLS. 2025 Jul-Sep;29(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00023. Epub 2025 Jul 14.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2025.00023
PMID:40666161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12257872/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers faster recovery and smaller incisions but is limited by persistent visualization issues such as lens fogging, debris, and camera instability. These challenges compromise surgical performance, increase complications, and elevate healthcare costs. This review evaluates the clinical and economic impact of suboptimal visualization in MIS and explores potential solutions.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using peer-reviewed literature from January 1990 to August 2024. Studies included those examining visualization challenges in laparoscopic and robotic MIS, clinical outcomes, surgeon-reported frustrations, and cost analyses. Exclusion criteria included studies with significant conflicts of interest, especially those funded by medical device companies.

RESULTS

Surgeons spend an estimated 40% of MIS operating time under suboptimal visual conditions, contributing to nearly 20% of surgical complications. Lens cleaning adds $132-$493 per procedure, averaging $312.53 based on 9.7 cleaning events per case. Visualization-related complications contribute an additional $251 per case. Combined, these issues result in over $2.2 billion in annual costs in the U.S. Poor visualization also disrupts workflow, increases surgeon fatigue, and hinders integration of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI).

CONCLUSIONS

Suboptimal visualization in MIS stands to significantly affect patient safety and healthcare costs. Addressing these challenges through standardized cleaning protocols, improved surgeon training, and adoption of advanced technologies-including AI-driven imaging-is essential. Enhancing visualization is not just a technical upgrade but a critical step toward safer, more efficient, and cost-effective surgical care.

摘要

背景与目的

微创手术(MIS)具有恢复快、切口小的优点,但受持续存在的可视化问题限制,如镜头起雾、碎片和摄像头不稳定。这些挑战会影响手术操作,增加并发症,并提高医疗成本。本综述评估了微创手术中可视化不佳的临床和经济影响,并探索潜在解决方案。

方法

使用1990年1月至2024年8月的同行评审文献进行系统综述。研究包括那些检查腹腔镜和机器人微创手术中的可视化挑战、临床结果、外科医生报告的挫折感以及成本分析的研究。排除标准包括存在重大利益冲突的研究,特别是那些由医疗器械公司资助的研究。

结果

据估计,外科医生在可视化条件不佳的情况下花费约40%的微创手术操作时间,导致近20%的手术并发症。每次手术的镜头清洁费用为132美元至493美元,基于每例9.7次清洁事件,平均为312.53美元。与可视化相关的并发症每例额外增加251美元。综合起来,这些问题在美国每年造成超过22亿美元的成本。可视化不佳还会扰乱工作流程,增加外科医生的疲劳,并阻碍人工智能(AI)等新兴技术的整合。

结论

微创手术中可视化不佳可能会显著影响患者安全和医疗成本。通过标准化清洁方案、改进外科医生培训以及采用包括人工智能驱动成像在内的先进技术来应对这些挑战至关重要。改善可视化不仅是技术升级,也是迈向更安全、高效和具有成本效益的手术护理的关键一步。

相似文献

1
Clear Vision, Clear Savings: Enhancing Efficiency in Minimally Invasive Surgery.清晰视野,显著节省:提高微创手术效率
JSLS. 2025 Jul-Sep;29(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00023. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
2
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
3
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
4
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
5
Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer.系统评价和经济建模研究腹腔镜手术和机器人手术治疗局限性前列腺癌患者前列腺的相对临床获益和成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(41):1-313. doi: 10.3310/hta16410.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
7
The rise of robotics and AI-assisted surgery in modern healthcare.现代医疗保健中机器人技术和人工智能辅助手术的兴起。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 20;19(1):311. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02485-0.
8
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive techniques to manage varicose veins: a systematic review and economic evaluation.微创技术治疗静脉曲张的临床有效性和成本效益:系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Oct;17(48):i-xvi, 1-141. doi: 10.3310/hta17480.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.

本文引用的文献

1
Current and future applications of artificial intelligence in surgery: implications for clinical practice and research.人工智能在外科手术中的当前及未来应用:对临床实践和研究的启示
Front Surg. 2024 May 9;11:1393898. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1393898. eCollection 2024.
2
Burden of gallstone disease in the United States population: Prepandemic rates and trends.美国人群胆结石疾病负担:疫情前的发病率及趋势
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Apr 27;16(4):1130-1148. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1130.
3
Partnering With Technology: Advancing Laparoscopy With Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.与技术合作:借助人工智能和机器学习推动腹腔镜检查技术发展
Cureus. 2024 Mar 13;16(3):e56076. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56076. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: The Future is Now.外科手术中的人工智能:未来已来。
Eur Surg Res. 2024 Jan 22. doi: 10.1159/000536393.
5
Advancements in Robotic Surgery: A Comprehensive Overview of Current Utilizations and Upcoming Frontiers.机器人手术的进展:当前应用及未来前沿的全面概述。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 12;15(12):e50415. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50415. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Impact of fatigue in surgeons on performance and patient outcome: systematic review.外科医生疲劳对手术表现和患者结局的影响:系统评价。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad397.
7
Analyzing Surgical Technique in Diverse Open Surgical Videos With Multitask Machine Learning.利用多任务机器学习分析多种开放性手术视频中的手术技术。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Feb 1;159(2):185-192. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6262.
8
Technological advancements in surgical laparoscopy considering artificial intelligence: a survey among surgeons in Germany.考虑人工智能的外科腹腔镜技术进展:德国外科医生的调查。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 16;408(1):405. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03134-6.
9
Impaired robotic surgical visualization: archaic issues in a modern operating room.机器人手术可视化受损:现代手术室中的陈旧问题。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2875-2880. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01733-5. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
10
Robotic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature and Current Trends.机器人手术:文献综述与当前趋势
Cureus. 2023 Jul 24;15(7):e42370. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42370. eCollection 2023 Jul.