Berbari Elijah, Anees Arsalan, Kaur Rajneesh, Ayeni Femi E, Edirimanne Senarath
Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Surgery, Nepean Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Kingswood, NSW, Australia.
Breast Care (Basel). 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1159/000546089.
More women are recovering and living longer lives due to advancement in breast cancer therapies. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are one form of endocrine therapy for breast cancer that may have an impact on the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases later in life. This study investigated whether AI therapy for breast cancer in postmenopausal women increases the risk of developing cardiovascular disease in comparison with tamoxifen therapy or no hormonal therapy.
Comparisons were made between tamoxifen and no hormonal therapy using PRISMA guidelines. We searched publicly available databases for studies including postmenopausal women who underwent AI therapy for breast cancer investigating the risk ratio of specific cardiovascular outcomes and cardiovascular death.
There was a significant increase in the risk of ischaemic heart disease (RR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.25-2.02, < 0.05), myocardial infarction (RR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.13-1.99, < 0.05), heart failure (RR 1.63, 95% CI: 1.14-2.32, < 0.05), and other cardiovascular events (RR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.12-1.40, < 0.05) in the AI group when compared to tamoxifen. However, there was a significant decrease in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65-0.90, < 0.05) in the AI group when compared to no hormonal treatment.
There is an increased risk of cardiovascular disease for AI therapy in comparison to tamoxifen therapy. However, further research is needed to establish the cardiovascular risk of AIs when compared to no hormonal therapy. Prognosis and survival of patients should be an important consideration in choosing between tamoxifen and AI therapy among patients receiving treatment for breast cancer. Regular monitoring is essential to facilitate personalized approaches aimed at mitigating the risk of cardiovascular toxicity.
由于乳腺癌治疗方法的进步,越来越多的女性得以康复并延长了寿命。芳香化酶抑制剂(AIs)是一种乳腺癌内分泌治疗方法,可能会影响日后患心血管疾病的风险。本研究调查了与他莫昔芬治疗或无激素治疗相比,绝经后女性乳腺癌的AI治疗是否会增加患心血管疾病的风险。
使用PRISMA指南对他莫昔芬和无激素治疗进行比较。我们在公开可用的数据库中搜索研究,这些研究纳入了接受乳腺癌AI治疗的绝经后女性,调查特定心血管结局和心血管死亡的风险比。
与他莫昔芬相比,AI组缺血性心脏病风险显著增加(风险比1.59,95%置信区间:1.25 - 2.02,P < 0.05)、心肌梗死(风险比1.50,95%置信区间:1.13 - 1.99,P < 0.05)、心力衰竭(风险比1.63,95%置信区间:1.14 - 2.32,P < 0.05)和其他心血管事件(风险比1.26,95%置信区间:1.12 - 1.40,P < 0.05)。然而,与无激素治疗相比,AI组心肌梗死风险显著降低(风险比0.77,95%置信区间:0.65 - 0.90,P < 0.05)。
与他莫昔芬治疗相比,AI治疗的心血管疾病风险增加。然而,与无激素治疗相比,需要进一步研究以确定AI的心血管风险。在接受乳腺癌治疗的患者中,选择他莫昔芬和AI治疗时,患者的预后和生存应是重要考虑因素。定期监测对于促进旨在降低心血管毒性风险的个性化方法至关重要。