• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估数据促进照护策略对改善艾滋病病毒照护结果的有效性:一项系统评价

Assessing the Effectiveness of Data-to-Care Strategies for Improving HIV Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Roberts Kristin Tansil, Mullins Mary, Higa Darrel H, Koenig Linda J, Mallett Megan, Wichser Megan, Denard Christa L, Gunn Jayleen, Nji Miriam A M, Nguyen Briana, Mitchell Janae, Pontes Miya, Underwood Madison, Sipe Theresa Ann

机构信息

Translation and Evaluation Branch, Division of HIV Prevention, The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd., Mailstop US8-5, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.

Office of the Director, Division of HIV Prevention, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Behav. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04768-x.

DOI:10.1007/s10461-025-04768-x
PMID:40668458
Abstract

Data-to-Care (D2C) is a strategy that uses HIV surveillance data or other data sources to identify out-of-care (OOC) persons with HIV (PWH) and link or re-engage them in care to improve viral suppression (VS). While some evidence suggests D2C is effective, no comprehensive systematic review has been published. This review aims to determine the effectiveness of D2C. A systematic search in five databases (i.e., MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, sociological abstracts) identified 3868 U.S. studies published between January 2009 and January 2021 that described D2C interventions and measured HIV care outcomes. Two reviewers screened titles/abstracts, reviewed full reports for eligibility, and abstracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and included studies were synthesized quantitatively and qualitatively (Protocol registered on PROSPERO ID = CRD42020173095). Thirty-four studies with 30 unique interventions were identified. Two different meta-analyses, each with six interventions, found that D2C approached significance in improving engagement in care (Relative Risk (RR) 95% CI 1.18 [0.99 to 1.41]) and VS (RR 95% CI 1.44 [0.99 to 2.09]). Studies that could not be incorporated into the meta-analyses, also showed improvements in engagement in care (median percent [IQI]: 63% [45% to 81%], 18 interventions) and VS (median percent [IQI]: 39% [25% to 57%], 14 interventions). Overall, this systematic review suggests that D2C may enhance HIV care outcomes, emphasizing the need for effective strategies to identify and engage OOC persons in care.

摘要

数据到关怀(D2C)是一种利用艾滋病毒监测数据或其他数据源来识别未接受治疗的艾滋病毒感染者(PWH),并使他们获得或重新获得治疗以提高病毒抑制(VS)的策略。虽然一些证据表明D2C是有效的,但尚未发表全面的系统评价。本评价旨在确定D2C的有效性。在五个数据库(即MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、社会学文摘)中进行的系统检索,确定了2009年1月至2021年1月期间发表的3868项美国研究,这些研究描述了D2C干预措施并测量了艾滋病毒治疗结果。两名评审员筛选标题/摘要,审查完整报告的资格,并提取数据。使用混合方法评估工具评估偏倚风险,纳入的研究进行了定量和定性综合分析(方案在PROSPERO ID=CRD42020173095上注册)。确定了34项研究,有30种独特的干预措施。两项不同的荟萃分析,每项有六种干预措施,发现D2C在改善治疗参与度(相对风险(RR)95%CI 1.18[0.99至1.41])和病毒抑制(RR 95%CI 1.44[0.99至2.09])方面接近显著水平。无法纳入荟萃分析的研究也显示治疗参与度有所改善(中位数百分比[四分位间距]:63%[45%至81%],18项干预措施)和病毒抑制(中位数百分比[四分位间距]:39%[25%至57%],14项干预措施)。总体而言,这项系统评价表明D2C可能会改善艾滋病毒治疗结果,强调需要有效的策略来识别未接受治疗的人并使其获得治疗。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Effectiveness of Data-to-Care Strategies for Improving HIV Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review.评估数据促进照护策略对改善艾滋病病毒照护结果的有效性:一项系统评价
AIDS Behav. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04768-x.
2
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.婴儿和幼儿操作痛的非药物处理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 14;6(6):CD006275. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006275.pub4.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Parent-infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health.改善父母和婴儿心理健康的亲子心理治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 8;1(1):CD010534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010534.pub2.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Using the exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment (EPIS) framework to assess the cooperative re-engagement controlled trial (CoRECT).使用探索、准备、实施、维持(EPIS)框架评估合作重新参与对照试验(CoRECT)。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 1;11:1223149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1223149. eCollection 2023.
2
The Cooperative Re-Engagement Controlled trial (CoRECT): A randomised trial to assess a collaborative data to care model to improve HIV care continuum outcomes.合作再参与对照试验(CoRECT):一项随机试验,旨在评估一种协作式数据到护理模式,以改善艾滋病毒护理连续结果。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021 Aug 28;3:100057. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100057. eCollection 2021 Nov.
3
The Future of Pharmacist-Delivered Status-Neutral HIV Prevention and Care.
药师提供的无状态艾滋病毒预防与护理的未来。
Am J Public Health. 2023 Mar;113(3):256-258. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307190. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
4
Overcoming Challenges to HIV Medical Care-seeking and Treatment Among Data-to-Care Program Clients in Baton Rouge and New Orleans, Louisiana.克服路易斯安那州巴吞鲁日和新奥尔良数据关怀项目客户在寻求艾滋病毒医疗护理和治疗方面的挑战。
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2023;34(1):71-82. doi: 10.1097/JNC.0000000000000375. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
5
Fixed-Effect vs Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis: 3 Points to Consider.Meta分析的固定效应模型与随机效应模型:三点需考虑之处。
Global Spine J. 2022 Sep;12(7):1624-1626. doi: 10.1177/21925682221110527. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
6
"Take care of their hierarchy of needs first": strategies used by data-to-care staff to address barriers to HIV care engagement.“首先满足他们的需求层次”:数据到护理工作人员用于解决艾滋病毒护理参与障碍的策略。
AIDS Care. 2023 May;35(5):764-771. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2022.2077296. Epub 2022 May 25.
7
Optimizing HIV Prevention Efforts to Achieve EHE Incidence Targets.优化艾滋病毒预防工作,以实现 EHE 发病率目标。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Apr 1;89(4):374-380. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002885.
8
Strategies to improve HIV care outcomes for people with HIV who are out of care.提高失访艾滋病病毒感染者艾滋病关怀结局的策略。
AIDS. 2022 May 1;36(6):853-862. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003172. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
9
Re-Engagement into HIV Care: A Systematic Review.重新参与艾滋病护理:一项系统综述。
AIDS Behav. 2022 Jan;26(1):132-146. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03365-y. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
10
Estimating the HIV Effective Reproduction Number in the United States and Evaluating HIV Elimination Strategies.估计美国的 HIV 有效繁殖数并评估 HIV 消除策略。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(2):152-161. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001397.