• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用关联医疗数据进行腹主动脉瘤靶向筛查的计算机模拟试验:一项研究方案。

In-silico trials of targeted screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms using linked healthcare data: A study protocol.

作者信息

Musto Liam, Saratzis Athanasios, Nath Mintu, Katsogridakis Emmanuel, Elsworth Ann, Bujkiewicz Sylwia, Hobson Clark, Lawson Claire, Wallace Susan, Gonzalez-Aguado Maria, Smith Aiden, Hodgson Susan, Yao Guiqing Lily, Miola José, Bown Matthew J

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and BHF Centre for Research Excellence, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0327856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327856. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0327856
PMID:40668804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12266404/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The NHS abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme (NAAASP) is both clinically and economically effective. One of the main determinants of this effectiveness is disease prevalence. AAA prevalence is decreasing over time, steadily reducing the efficiency of the current NAAASP screening policy. One alternative to whole population screening is targeted screening of high-risk groups. Whether this would detect a clinically and publicly acceptable proportion of disease, and whether it would improve cost-effectiveness are unknown. The aim of this research is to estimate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of targeted AAA screening.

METHODS

Rather than conducting an expensive and time-consuming randomized trial to directly test targeted screening, we will undertake in-silico trials of targeted AAA screening. To determine success criteria for in-silico trials, the ethics and issues around the acceptability of targeted screening will first be explored through focus groups and interviews. A qualitative evidence synthesis to identify issues associated with targeted screening will be used to establish themes and topic guides. To perform the in-silico trials, individual men's outcomes from the NAAASP (2013-2024, ≈ 2,500,000 men, ≈ 1% with AAA) will be linked to primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) (20% overlap of records). Risk factors for AAA will be identified by developing a risk prediction model and used as targeted screening criteria in in-silico trials, with diagnostic accuracy as the primary outcome. A discrete event simulation model will be adopted to extrapolate the trial findings beyond the observed period. We will estimate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of targeted screening compared with the current whole population screening strategy. Data linkage will be undertaken under Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group (Section 251) approval. Linked data will be effectively anonymised. Participants in the qualitative substudy will provide informed consent for participation.

DISCUSSION

We expect this project to have a direct and significant impact on NHS, UK and worldwide AAA screening policies. The study findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings.

摘要

背景

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查项目在临床和经济方面均具有成效。该成效的主要决定因素之一是疾病患病率。随着时间推移,AAA患病率在下降,这使得当前NHS腹主动脉瘤筛查政策的效率稳步降低。全人群筛查的一种替代方案是对高危群体进行针对性筛查。这是否能检测出临床上和公众可接受的疾病比例,以及是否能提高成本效益尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估针对性AAA筛查的临床结果和成本效益。

方法

我们不会开展昂贵且耗时的随机试验来直接测试针对性筛查,而是将进行针对性AAA筛查的计算机模拟试验。为确定计算机模拟试验的成功标准,首先将通过焦点小组和访谈探讨针对性筛查可接受性的伦理和相关问题。将采用定性证据综合法来识别与针对性筛查相关的问题,以确立主题和主题指南。为进行计算机模拟试验,NHS腹主动脉瘤筛查项目(2013 - 2024年,约250万名男性,约1%患有AAA)中个体男性的结果将与来自临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)的初级保健数据相链接(记录重叠20%)。将通过开发风险预测模型来确定AAA的风险因素,并将其用作计算机模拟试验中的针对性筛查标准,以诊断准确性作为主要结果。将采用离散事件模拟模型将试验结果外推至观察期之外。我们将评估与当前全人群筛查策略相比,针对性筛查的临床和成本效益。数据链接将在健康研究管理局保密咨询小组(第251条)批准下进行。链接的数据将进行有效的匿名处理。定性子研究的参与者将提供知情同意书以参与研究。

讨论

我们预计该项目将对英国国家医疗服务体系、英国乃至全球的AAA筛查政策产生直接且重大的影响。研究结果将提交至同行评审期刊发表,并在科学会议上展示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaea/12266404/acf3fd6fe317/pone.0327856.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaea/12266404/acf3fd6fe317/pone.0327856.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaea/12266404/acf3fd6fe317/pone.0327856.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
In-silico trials of targeted screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms using linked healthcare data: A study protocol.利用关联医疗数据进行腹主动脉瘤靶向筛查的计算机模拟试验:一项研究方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0327856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327856. eCollection 2025.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the growth and rupture rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: implications for surveillance intervals and their cost-effectiveness.系统评价和荟萃分析小的腹主动脉瘤的生长和破裂率:对监测间隔及其成本效益的影响。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Sep;17(41):1-118. doi: 10.3310/hta17410.
4
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
7
Laparoscopic surgery for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复的腹腔镜手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD012302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012302.pub2.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.开角型青光眼筛查的临床有效性和成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Oct;11(41):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta11410.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality and Completeness of Myocardial Infarction Recording in Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum.临床实践研究数据链Aurum中心肌梗死记录的质量与完整性
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 24;13:745-753. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S319245. eCollection 2021.
2
CPRD Aurum database: Assessment of data quality and completeness of three important comorbidities.CPRD Aurum 数据库:三种重要合并症的数据质量和完整性评估。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Nov;29(11):1456-1464. doi: 10.1002/pds.5135. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
3
Quality and completeness of diagnoses recorded in the new CPRD Aurum Database: evaluation of pulmonary embolism.
新 CPRD Aurum 数据库中记录的诊断的质量和完整性:肺栓塞评估。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):1134-1140. doi: 10.1002/pds.4996. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
4
Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model.计算开发临床预测模型所需的样本量。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m441.
5
Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.筛查腹主动脉瘤:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2019 Dec 10;322(22):2211-2218. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18928.
6
Plasma Desmosine and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Disease.血浆脱氧异皮质酮与腹主动脉瘤疾病。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct 15;8(20):e013743. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013743. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
7
The accuracy of date of death recording in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database in England compared with the Office for National Statistics death registrations.英国临床实践研究数据链 GOLD 数据库中死亡日期记录的准确性与国家统计局死亡登记数据的比较。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 May;28(5):563-569. doi: 10.1002/pds.4747. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
8
Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum.数据资源简介:临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)奥鲁姆
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 1;48(6):1740-1740g. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz034.
9
Screening women aged 65 years or over for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a modelling study and health economic evaluation.对 65 岁或以上的女性进行腹主动脉瘤筛查:建模研究和健康经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(43):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta22430.
10
Benefits and harms of screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Sweden: a registry-based cohort study.瑞典男性腹部主动脉瘤筛查的获益与危害:基于登记的队列研究。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 16;391(10138):2441-2447. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31031-6.