• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病理分期为III期乳腺癌患者改良根治术与保乳手术的放疗临床结果比较:一项基于全国人群的匹配队列研究。

Comparing irradiated clinical outcomes between modified radical mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery in patients with pathologic stage III breast cancer: A national population-based match cohort study.

作者信息

Lin Chun-Hung, Yang Hsuan-Ju, Hung Shih-Kai, Lee Moon-Sing, Chiou Wen-Yen, Chew Chia-Hui, Chen Liang-Cheng, Yu Ben-Hui, Hsu Feng-Chun, Lin Hon-Yi

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.

出版信息

Surgery. 2025 Jul 15;185:109539. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109539.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2025.109539
PMID:40669153
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available for comparing irradiated clinical outcomes between modified radical mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery for patients with pathologic stage III breast cancer, especially when stratified by molecular subtypes.

METHODS

The present population-based cohort study used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients with pathologic stage III breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy or modified radical mastectomy plus radiotherapy from 2006 to 2019 were included in data analysis. The baseline characteristics of the breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy and modified radical mastectomy plus radiotherapy groups were matched using propensity scores, with exact matching for the molecular subtypes of breast cancer between the 2 groups. Local-regional recurrence, distant metastasis, disease-free survival, and overall survival as the primary outcomes were assessed using Fine and Gray's competing-risk regression model, stratified by breast cancer subtypes.

RESULTS

A total of 5,166 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy (n = 2,583) and modified radical mastectomy plus radiotherapy (n = 2,583) were included. Overall, our results showed a lower incidence of local-regional recurrence with modified radical mastectomy plus radiotherapy than with breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy (0.6% vs 1.9%, P = .001; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.33; P = .0002). However, no difference was observed in the rates of distant metastasis, disease-free survival, and overall survival between the breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy and modified radical mastectomy plus radiotherapy groups. Notably, among those with luminal breast cancer, the risk of local-regional recurrence was lower in patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy plus radiotherapy than those who underwent breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.28 (P = .022). For patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer, a lower risk of local-regional recurrence was observed in modified radical mastectomy + radiotherapy compared with breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.06 (P = .0018). However, for triple-negative breast cancer, no differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of local-regional recurrence, distant metastasis, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated that modified radical mastectomy + radiotherapy offers a greater advantage in reducing the risk of local-regional recurrence compared with breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy in patients with pathologic stage III breast cancer, particularly those with luminal or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive molecular subtypes. However, this advantage is not observed in other clinical outcomes, such as, distant metastasis, disease-free survival, and overall survival, and it does not have a significant effect in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to establish robust clinical evidence.

摘要

背景

关于病理分期为III期乳腺癌患者,改良根治性乳房切除术与保乳手术的放疗临床结局比较的数据有限,尤其是按分子亚型分层时。

方法

本基于人群的队列研究使用了台湾全民健康保险研究数据库。对2006年至2019年期间接受保乳手术加放疗或改良根治性乳房切除术加放疗的病理分期为III期乳腺癌患者进行数据分析。使用倾向评分匹配保乳手术加放疗组和改良根治性乳房切除术加放疗组的基线特征,两组间乳腺癌分子亚型进行精确匹配。使用Fine和Gray竞争风险回归模型评估局部区域复发、远处转移、无病生存期和总生存期作为主要结局,并按乳腺癌亚型分层。

结果

共纳入5166例接受保乳手术加放疗(n = 2583)和改良根治性乳房切除术加放疗(n = 2583)的患者。总体而言,我们的结果显示改良根治性乳房切除术加放疗的局部区域复发发生率低于保乳手术加放疗(0.6%对1.9%,P = 0.001;调整后风险比,0.33;P = 0.0002)。然而,保乳手术加放疗组和改良根治性乳房切除术加放疗组在远处转移率、无病生存期和总生存期方面未观察到差异。值得注意的是,在管腔型乳腺癌患者中,接受改良根治性乳房切除术加放疗的患者局部区域复发风险低于接受保乳手术加放疗的患者,调整后风险比为0.28(P = 0.022)。对于人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌患者,改良根治性乳房切除术加放疗与保乳手术加放疗相比,局部区域复发风险更低,调整后风险比为0.06(P = 0.0018)。然而,对于三阴性乳腺癌,两组在局部区域复发、远处转移、无病生存期和总生存期方面未观察到差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,对于病理分期为III期乳腺癌患者,尤其是管腔型或人表皮生长因子受体2阳性分子亚型患者,改良根治性乳房切除术加放疗在降低局部区域复发风险方面比保乳手术加放疗具有更大优势。然而,在其他临床结局如远处转移、无病生存期和总生存期方面未观察到这种优势,且对三阴性乳腺癌患者没有显著影响。需要进一步的随机对照试验来建立有力的临床证据。

相似文献

1
Comparing irradiated clinical outcomes between modified radical mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery in patients with pathologic stage III breast cancer: A national population-based match cohort study.病理分期为III期乳腺癌患者改良根治术与保乳手术的放疗临床结果比较:一项基于全国人群的匹配队列研究。
Surgery. 2025 Jul 15;185:109539. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109539.
2
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for women with primary breast cancer.原发性乳腺癌患者的肿瘤整形保乳手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 29;10(10):CD013658. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013658.pub2.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Axillary treatment for operable primary breast cancer.可手术原发性乳腺癌的腋窝治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 4;1(1):CD004561. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004561.pub3.
5
Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.对局部晚期宫颈癌女性患者进行子宫切除术并辅以放疗或化疗或两者联合治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 7(4):CD010260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010260.pub2.
6
Long-Term Oncologic Outcome of Breast-Conserving Treatment in Patients With Breast Cancer With BRCA Variants.携带BRCA基因变异的乳腺癌患者保乳治疗的长期肿瘤学结局
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e259840. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9840.
7
Tumour bed boost radiotherapy for women after breast-conserving surgery.保乳手术后女性的瘤床加量放疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 6;11(11):CD011987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011987.pub2.
8
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
9
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
10
A systematic overview of radiation therapy effects in breast cancer.乳腺癌放射治疗效果的系统综述。
Acta Oncol. 2003;42(5-6):532-45. doi: 10.1080/02841860310014444.