Zhu Zichun, Wu Haohao, Jiang Ke, Xiao Qitao, Wu Huawu, Zhang Haixia, Xia Ye, Fu Congsheng
Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China.
J Environ Manage. 2025 Sep;391:126603. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126603. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
Lake carbon dioxide (CO) evasion is a crucial component of global carbon cycle, yet the influence of environmental factors on CO emissions within different hydrological connectivity remains uncertain. Based on multiple machine learning methods, we investigated seasonal and annual CO fluxes, and the discrepancy in contributions and threshold behaviors of key variables to CO flux variations, in two river-connected lakes (Hongze and Poyang) and two non-river-connected lakes (Chaohu and Taihu). Random Forest performed well in CO flux simulations, with R values ranging from 0.91 to 0.95. Our results indicated that all four lakes acted as CO sources. Hongze Lake had higher CO fluxes in the wet season than in the dry season, while the other three lakes showed the opposite pattern. Solar radiation and pH were the dominant factors influencing CO flux variations in Hongze Lake and Taihu Lake, respectively. CO flux variations in river-connected lakes were more sensitive to total phosphorus (TP) concentration than in non-river-connected lakes, due to shorter hydrologic residence time, causing a faster response of chlorophyll-a to TP, with the lag times of chlorophyll-a responses to TP being 0-1 months for river-connected lakes and 1-4 months for non-river-connected lakes. Conversely, CO emissions in non-river-connected lakes were strongly influenced by pH, with the pH peak occurring 1 month earlier than the peak of CO fluxes during the wet season. Threshold behaviors were revealed for pH, solar radiation, wind speed, TP and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations, and lake level/volume, with non-linear responses affecting CO flux dynamics in each lake. These mechanistic findings enhance the scientific understanding on lake carbon emissions.
湖泊二氧化碳(CO)逸出是全球碳循环的一个关键组成部分,然而环境因素对不同水文连通性下CO排放的影响仍不确定。基于多种机器学习方法,我们研究了两个与河流相连的湖泊(洪泽湖和鄱阳湖)以及两个与河流不相连的湖泊(巢湖和太湖)的季节性和年度CO通量,以及关键变量对CO通量变化的贡献差异和阈值行为。随机森林在CO通量模拟中表现良好,R值范围为0.91至0.95。我们的结果表明,所有四个湖泊均为CO源。洪泽湖在湿季的CO通量高于干季,而其他三个湖泊则呈现相反的模式。太阳辐射和pH分别是影响洪泽湖和太湖CO通量变化的主要因素。与河流不相连的湖泊相比,与河流相连的湖泊的CO通量变化对总磷(TP)浓度更为敏感,这是由于水文停留时间较短,导致叶绿素a对TP的响应更快,与河流相连的湖泊中叶绿素a对TP的响应滞后时间为0 - 1个月,而与河流不相连的湖泊为1 - 4个月。相反,与河流不相连的湖泊中的CO排放受pH强烈影响,在湿季pH峰值比CO通量峰值早出现1个月。揭示了pH、太阳辐射、风速、TP和总氮(TN)浓度以及湖泊水位/容积的阈值行为,非线性响应影响了每个湖泊的CO通量动态。这些机理研究结果增强了对湖泊碳排放的科学理解。