• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者家庭照顾者预期性悲伤预测模型的构建与验证:基于LASSO-逻辑回归模型

Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Anticipatory Grief in Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Based on LASSO-Logistic Regression Model.

作者信息

Sun Di, Huang Tingting, Li Jiaojiao, Liu Meishuo, Zhang Xu, Cui Mengyao

机构信息

School of Nursing, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.

Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2025 Jul;34(7):e70236. doi: 10.1002/pon.70236.

DOI:10.1002/pon.70236
PMID:40670296
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anticipatory grief is a significant emotional challenge for family caregivers of cancer patients, yet its early identification remains limited by subjective assessments and a lack of predictive tools. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for anticipatory grief among family caregivers of cancer patients in China.

METHODS

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted from February to October 2023, involving 642 family caregivers of lung and breast cancer patients from two tertiary hospitals in Liaoning Province, China. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) classified caregivers into anticipatory grief risk categories based on the Anticipatory Grief Scale. LASSO-logistic regression was used to identify predictors and construct a predictive model, which was validated using discrimination (AUC), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test), and clinical utility (Decision Curve Analysis). A web-based nomogram was developed for practical application.

RESULTS

The mean anticipatory grief score was 72.44 ± 18.49, with LPA identifying three profiles: low (54.52%), moderate (30.53%), and high (14.95%) anticipatory grief. Seven predictors were identified: caregiver education level, monthly income, physical condition, caregiving duration, and patient cancer type, employment status, and time since diagnosis. The model showed good discrimination (AUC: 0.769 training, 0.671 validation), calibration (P = 0.095 training, P = 0.801 validation), and clinical utility (net benefit at 34%-62% threshold). The web-based tool is accessible at https://nomogrameofag.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/.

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed a predictive model for anticipatory grief, identifying key risk factors and providing a practical tool for healthcare providers to identify high-risk caregivers. The findings support targeted interventions to enhance caregiver well-being and patient care quality, though future research should expand cancer types and incorporate qualitative insights for broader applicability.

摘要

背景

预期性悲伤是癌症患者家庭照顾者面临的一项重大情感挑战,然而其早期识别仍受主观评估及缺乏预测工具的限制。本研究旨在开发并验证中国癌症患者家庭照顾者预期性悲伤的预测模型。

方法

于2023年2月至10月进行了一项多中心横断面研究,纳入了来自中国辽宁省两家三级医院的642名肺癌和乳腺癌患者的家庭照顾者。潜在剖面分析(LPA)根据预期性悲伤量表将照顾者分为预期性悲伤风险类别。使用LASSO逻辑回归识别预测因素并构建预测模型,通过区分度(AUC)、校准度(Hosmer-Lemeshow检验)和临床实用性(决策曲线分析)对其进行验证。开发了一个基于网络的列线图以供实际应用。

结果

预期性悲伤平均得分为72.44 ± 18.49,LPA识别出三种类型:低预期性悲伤(54.52%)、中度预期性悲伤(30.53%)和高预期性悲伤(14.95%)。识别出七个预测因素:照顾者教育水平、月收入、身体状况、照顾时长、患者癌症类型、就业状况以及确诊后的时间。该模型显示出良好的区分度(训练集AUC:0.769,验证集AUC:0.671)、校准度(训练集P = 0.095,验证集P = 0.801)和临床实用性(在34%-62%阈值下有净获益)。基于网络的工具可通过https://nomogrameofag.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/访问。

结论

本研究开发了预期性悲伤的预测模型,识别出关键风险因素,并为医疗保健提供者提供了一种识别高风险照顾者的实用工具。这些发现支持进行有针对性的干预,以提高照顾者的幸福感和患者护理质量,不过未来的研究应扩大癌症类型并纳入定性见解以实现更广泛的适用性。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Anticipatory Grief in Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Based on LASSO-Logistic Regression Model.癌症患者家庭照顾者预期性悲伤预测模型的构建与验证:基于LASSO-逻辑回归模型
Psychooncology. 2025 Jul;34(7):e70236. doi: 10.1002/pon.70236.
2
Validation of the Anticipatory Grief Scale through Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Latent Profile Analysis.通过验证性因素分析和潜在剖面分析验证预期悲伤量表
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e70117. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70117.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
5
Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting the occurrence of necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants with late-onset sepsis.预测晚发性败血症早产儿坏死性小肠结肠炎发生的列线图模型的开发与验证
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jul 8;30(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02857-0.
6
Interventions for patients and caregivers to improve knowledge of sickle cell disease and recognition of its related complications.针对患者及护理人员的干预措施,以提高对镰状细胞病的认识及其相关并发症的识别能力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 6;10(10):CD011175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011175.pub2.
7
Artificial Intelligence-Based prediction model for surgical site infection in metastatic spinal disease: a multicenter development and validation study.基于人工智能的转移性脊柱疾病手术部位感染预测模型:一项多中心开发与验证研究。
Int J Surg. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002806.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in reducing grief experienced by family carers of people with dementia: a systematic review.心理社会干预对减轻痴呆症患者家庭照顾者悲伤情绪的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Mar;15(3):809-839. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003017.
10
Development and external validation of a prediction model for brain metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer.开发和外部验证转移性乳腺癌患者脑转移预测模型。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct;149(13):12333-12353. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05125-y. Epub 2023 Jul 11.