Yiu Chin Hang, Ianni Bella D, Day Richard O, Raubenheimer Jacques, Lu Christine Y
The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Pharmaceut Med. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1007/s40290-025-00577-8.
Australia has one of the highest rates of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) worldwide. Etanercept, a widely used biologic for severe RA, has had a publicly subsidised biosimilar available in Australia since 2017. However, real-world data on how biosimilar availability has affected treatment patterns remain limited.
This study aimed to assess treatment persistence-a surrogate measure of long-term treatment effectiveness-with etanercept before and after public subsidy of its biosimilar for RA, utilising a national sample.
This retrospective cohort study analysed national healthcare claims data from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) via the Australian Bureau of Statistics DataLab. Adults (age ≥ 18 years) initiating etanercept for severe RA were stratified into two cohorts: historical (before biosimilar PBS listing, comprising only originator users) and contemporary (after biosimilar PBS listing, comprising both biosimilar and originator users). Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression were employed to assess treatment persistence. Subgroup analysis of older adults and sensitivity analysis limited to biologic-naïve individuals were also performed.
A total of 10,234 individuals initiating etanercept for severe RA were included, with 4461 in the historical cohort and 5773 in the contemporary cohort. The median time to treatment discontinuation was 10.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.7-10.6) in the contemporary cohort and 10.6 months (95% CI 10.0-11.4) in the historical cohort (p = 0.08). At 12 and 24 months, treatment retention rates were similar between cohorts. The adjusted hazard ratio for treatment discontinuation in the contemporary cohort was 1.00 (95% CI 0.96-1.05), indicating no significant differences. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses yielded similar results.
This large, population-based study found no significant difference in treatment persistence following the introduction of the etanercept biosimilar in Australia. These findings support the real-world integration of biosimilars into routine care. Further research should include direct comparative analyses of originator and biosimilars to inform long-term treatment strategies, clinician confidence, and sustainable healthcare policy.
澳大利亚是全球类风湿性关节炎(RA)发病率最高的国家之一。依那西普是一种广泛用于重度RA的生物制剂,自2017年以来,其生物类似药在澳大利亚已获得公共补贴。然而,关于生物类似药的可及性如何影响治疗模式的真实世界数据仍然有限。
本研究旨在利用全国样本评估在依那西普生物类似药获得RA公共补贴前后,使用依那西普治疗的持续性——这是长期治疗效果的替代指标。
这项回顾性队列研究通过澳大利亚统计局数据实验室分析了药品福利计划(PBS)的全国医疗保健报销数据。开始使用依那西普治疗重度RA的成年人(年龄≥18岁)被分为两个队列:历史队列(在生物类似药PBS上市之前,仅包括原研药使用者)和当代队列(在生物类似药PBS上市之后,包括生物类似药和原研药使用者)。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和多变量Cox回归评估治疗持续性。还对老年人进行了亚组分析,并对仅使用过生物制剂的个体进行了敏感性分析。
共有10234名开始使用依那西普治疗重度RA的个体被纳入研究,其中历史队列中有4461人,当代队列中有5773人。当代队列中治疗中断的中位时间为10.0个月(95%置信区间(CI)9.7 - 10.6),历史队列中为10.6个月(95%CI 10.0 - 11.4)(p = 0.08)。在12个月和24个月时,各队列之间的治疗保留率相似。当代队列中治疗中断的调整后风险比为1.00(95%CI 0.96 - 1.05),表明无显著差异。亚组分析和敏感性分析得出了相似的结果。
这项基于人群的大型研究发现,澳大利亚引入依那西普生物类似药后,治疗持续性没有显著差异。这些发现支持将生物类似药实际纳入常规治疗。进一步的研究应包括对原研药和生物类似药的直接比较分析,以为长期治疗策略、临床医生信心和可持续的医疗政策提供参考。