Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜与开放全胃切除术联合D2淋巴结清扫术治疗胃癌的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究

Comparison of laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matched study.

作者信息

Kütük Deniz, Koç Mehmet Ali, Çakmak Atıl, Kocaay Akın Fırat

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03044-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is increasingly performed for gastric cancer, yet concerns remain regarding its oncologic adequacy compared to open total gastrectomy (OTG), especially outside of randomized clinical trials. Real-world data comparing both techniques are still limited.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer between January 2016 and December 2021 at a single tertiary center. Patients were grouped as LTG or OTG. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to adjust for baseline variables. Long-term clinical outcomes and survival data were compared. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

After propensity score matching (24 LTG vs. 24 OTG), the LTG group demonstrated a significantly shorter hospital stay (6.79 ± 0.66 vs. 7.33 ± 0.64 days; p = 0.006), with comparable operative times (3.5 ± 0.42 vs. 3.5 ± 0.49 h; p = 1.000) and complication rates (16.7% vs. 20.8%; p = 0.71), all classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II. Oncologic outcomes showed equivalent lymph node yield. Oncologic outcomes were equivalent, including lymph node yield (35.12 ± 9.32 vs. 36.46 ± 10.19; p = 0.639). Survival analysis revealed no significant differences: median overall survival was 6 years (95% CI: 3.87-8.12) for LTG vs. 4 years (2.16-5.83) for OTG (p = 0.541), and disease-free survival was 6 years (4.53-7.46) vs. 4 years (1.72-6.27) (p = 0.443), with a median follow-up of 28.4 months.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy is a safe and effective alternative to open surgery when performed by experienced surgeons. These findings support the feasibility of LTG in real-life clinical settings and complement existing evidence from randomized trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜全胃切除术(LTG)在胃癌治疗中的应用日益广泛,但与开放全胃切除术(OTG)相比,其肿瘤学疗效仍存在争议,尤其是在非随机临床试验中。比较这两种技术的真实世界数据仍然有限。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2016年1月至2021年12月期间在单一三级中心接受胃癌D2淋巴结清扫全胃切除术的患者。患者分为LTG组或OTG组。采用倾向评分匹配(1:1)来调整基线变量。比较长期临床结局和生存数据。并发症采用Clavien-Dindo分类法分级。采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。

结果

倾向评分匹配后(24例LTG vs. 24例OTG),LTG组住院时间显著缩短(6.79±0.66天 vs. 7.33±0.64天;p = 0.006),手术时间相当(3.5±0.42小时 vs. 3.5±0.49小时;p = 1.000),并发症发生率相当(16.7% vs. 20.8%;p = 0.71),所有并发症均为Clavien-Dindo I-II级。肿瘤学结局显示淋巴结收获量相当。肿瘤学结局相当,包括淋巴结收获量(35.12±9.32 vs. 36.46±10.19;p = 0.639)。生存分析显示无显著差异:LTG组的中位总生存期为6年(95%CI:3.87 - 8.12),OTG组为4年(2.16 - 5.83)(p = 0.541),无病生存期为6年(4.53 - 7.46) vs. 4年(1.72 - 6.27)(p = 0.443),中位随访时间为28.4个月。

结论

由经验丰富的外科医生进行腹腔镜全胃切除术是开放手术的一种安全有效的替代方法。这些发现支持了LTG在现实临床环境中的可行性,并补充了随机试验的现有证据。

试验注册

回顾性注册。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验