Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜全胃切除术的现状

Current status of laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

作者信息

Kawaguchi Yoshihiko, Shiraishi Kensuke, Akaike Hidenori, Ichikawa Daisuke

机构信息

First Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine University of Yamanashi Chuo Yamanashi Japan.

出版信息

Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018 Sep 17;3(1):14-23. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12208. eCollection 2019 Jan.

Abstract

In this article, the current state of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) was reviewed, focusing on lymph node dissection and reconstruction. Lymph node dissection in LTG is technically similar to that in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer; however, LTG for advanced gastric cancer requires extended lymph node dissections including splenic hilar lymph nodes. Although a recent randomized controlled trial clearly indicated no survival benefit in prophylactic splenectomy for lymph node dissection at the splenic hilum, some patients may receive prognostic benefit from adequate splenic hilar lymph node dissection. Considering reconstruction, there are two major esophagojejunostomy (EJS) techniques, using a circular stapler (CS) or using a linear stapler (LS). A few studies have shown that the LS method has fewer complications; however, almost all studies have reported that morbidity (such as anastomotic leakage and stricture) is not significantly different for the two methods. As for CS, we grouped various studies addressing complications in LTG into categories according to the insertion procedure of the anvil and the insertion site in the abdominal wall for the CS. We compared the rate of complications, particularly for leakage and stricture. The rate of anastomotic leakage and stricture was the lowest when inserting the CS from the upper left abdomen and was significantly the highest when inserting the CS from the midline umbilical. Scrupulous attention to EJS techniques is required by surgeons with a clear understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each anastomotic device and approach.

摘要

在本文中,我们回顾了腹腔镜全胃切除术(LTG)的现状,重点关注淋巴结清扫和重建。LTG中的淋巴结清扫在技术上与早期胃癌的腹腔镜远端胃切除术相似;然而,进展期胃癌的LTG需要扩大淋巴结清扫范围,包括脾门淋巴结。尽管最近一项随机对照试验明确表明,预防性脾切除术对脾门淋巴结清扫并无生存获益,但一些患者可能会从充分的脾门淋巴结清扫中获得预后益处。关于重建,有两种主要的食管空肠吻合术(EJS)技术,即使用圆形吻合器(CS)或线性吻合器(LS)。一些研究表明,LS方法的并发症较少;然而,几乎所有研究都报告称,两种方法的发病率(如吻合口漏和狭窄)并无显著差异。对于CS,我们根据CS钉砧的插入程序和腹壁插入部位,将各种关于LTG并发症的研究进行分类。我们比较了并发症发生率,尤其是漏和狭窄的发生率。从左上腹插入CS时,吻合口漏和狭窄的发生率最低,从中线脐部插入CS时,发生率显著最高。外科医生需要严格关注EJS技术,清楚了解每种吻合器械和方法的优缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d31/6345655/3cd6c2b93f98/AGS3-3-14-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验