Li Miao, Li Tong, Chen Yi, Ge Ningling, Yang Biwei, Chen Rongxin, Shen Yinghao, Zhang Lan
Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Liver Cancer Institute, National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion, Ministry of Education, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Jun 30;16(3):1196-1207. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2024-962. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
Bevacizumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), interventional therapy, either alone or in combination, have demonstrated promising anti-tumor activities in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the optimal dosing strategy for bevacizumab within combination regimens remains undetermined. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different bevacizumab doses in triple therapy combining bevacizumab, ICIs, and interventional therapy for unresectable HCC.
A retrospective study included patients with unresectable HCC treated with interventional therapy combined with bevacizumab (full dose or half dose) and ICIs between December 2020 and July 2023 was conducted. Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1) was applied to minimize confounding effects. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were compared and evaluated. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were analyzed to assess safety.
Among 66 enrolled patients, 36 received full-dose bevacizumab, and 30 received half-dose bevacizumab. The full-dose group exhibited significantly longer PFS compared to the half-dose group (median PFS: not attained 8.0 months, P<0.001). Median OS was not reached in either group, with 1-year OS rate of 86% in the full-dose group and 83% in the half-dose group. Although full-dose group showed numerically higher ORR (55.6% 36.7%, P=0.13) and DCR (88.9% 83.3%, P=0.51), these differences did not reach statistical significance. Half-dose group experienced comparable AEs with full-dose group. Post-PSM analyses corroborated these findings.
Although full-dose bevacizumab in triple therapy showed prolonged PFS compared to half-dose group, no statistically significant differences were observed in long-term survival outcomes or treatment-related AEs between the two groups. For unresectable HCC patients with severe liver cirrhosis, half-dose bevacizumab may serve as a safer alternative without compromising survival benefits.
贝伐单抗、免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)、介入治疗,单独使用或联合使用,在不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)中均已显示出有前景的抗肿瘤活性。然而,联合治疗方案中贝伐单抗的最佳给药策略仍未确定。本研究旨在比较贝伐单抗不同剂量在贝伐单抗、ICIs和介入治疗联合的三联疗法中治疗不可切除HCC的疗效和安全性。
进行一项回顾性研究,纳入2020年12月至2023年7月期间接受介入治疗联合贝伐单抗(全剂量或半剂量)和ICIs治疗的不可切除HCC患者。应用倾向评分匹配(PSM,1:1)以最小化混杂效应。比较并评估无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。分析治疗相关不良事件(AE)以评估安全性。
66例入组患者中,36例接受全剂量贝伐单抗,30例接受半剂量贝伐单抗。全剂量组的PFS显著长于半剂量组(中位PFS:未达到对8.0个月,P<0.001)。两组的中位OS均未达到,全剂量组的1年OS率为86%,半剂量组为83%。虽然全剂量组的ORR(55.6%对36.7%,P=0.13)和DCR(88.9%对83.3%,P=0.51)在数值上更高,但这些差异未达到统计学意义。半剂量组经历的AE与全剂量组相当。PSM后分析证实了这些发现。
虽然三联疗法中全剂量贝伐单抗与半剂量组相比显示出PFS延长,但两组在长期生存结果或治疗相关AE方面未观察到统计学显著差异。对于患有严重肝硬化的不可切除HCC患者,半剂量贝伐单抗可能是一种更安全的选择,且不影响生存获益。