Anders Jake, Freeman Anthony, Hou Baichun, Sone Philippa, Lopez-Phelan Jasmine, Padgen Patrick, Giguere Rebecca, Gowdicott Cam, Ge Shima, Clarke Alyson, Herrera Cristina, Edelstein Zoe, Sandfort Theo G M
HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A.
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, New York, U.S.A.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003728.
An overview of existing research on HIV testing among transgender and other gender diverse (TGD) populations in the United States is missing, while critical for informing future interventions and research.
Employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, three databases (CINAHL, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO) were searched for studies reporting in English on HIV testing behavior that focused on or included TGD persons, published in the last decade (February 2, 2013 to February 2, 2023). Twenty-six studies were included and extracted using Covidence.
Four topics regarding HIV testing among TGD persons were identified: prevalence of HIV testing compared with cisgender persons, testing frequency and associated factors among TGD persons, barriers and facilitators to HIV testing experienced by TGD persons, and testing modalities. TGD persons seemed more likely to have been tested for HIV compared to cisgender persons, but less frequent compared to cisgender men who have sex with men. Barriers to testing included availability, confidentiality concerns, and negative interactions with providers. Social support and gender-affirming care were seen as facilitators. Self-testing, although not common, was acceptable and preferred when available. The conceptualizations and operationalizations of the term transgender varied markedly across studies.
Our understanding of HIV testing practices in TGD populations is limited and shows serious gaps. Research on repeat testing is needed to enhance HIV prevention and care among TGD populations. Future research might benefit from theory-driven approaches and from involving TGD persons in the design and implementation of studies to ensure relevance and efficacy.
美国跨性别者及其他性别多样化(TGD)人群中关于HIV检测的现有研究综述尚付阙如,而这对于为未来的干预措施和研究提供信息至关重要。
采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目,检索了三个数据库(CINAHL、PubMed/Medline、PsycINFO),以查找过去十年(2013年2月2日至2023年2月2日)发表的、以英文报道的、聚焦于或纳入了TGD人群的HIV检测行为的研究。使用Covidence纳入并提取了26项研究。
确定了关于TGD人群HIV检测的四个主题:与顺性别者相比的HIV检测流行率、TGD人群的检测频率及相关因素、TGD人群经历的HIV检测障碍和促进因素以及检测方式。与顺性别者相比,TGD人群似乎更有可能接受过HIV检测,但与顺性别男同性恋者相比检测频率较低。检测障碍包括可及性、保密性担忧以及与医护人员的负面互动。社会支持和性别肯定性护理被视为促进因素。自我检测虽然不常见,但在可行时是可接受且更受青睐的。“跨性别者”一词的概念化和操作化在各项研究中差异显著。
我们对TGD人群中HIV检测实践的理解有限,且存在严重差距。需要开展关于重复检测的研究,以加强TGD人群中的HIV预防和护理。未来的研究可能会受益于理论驱动的方法,以及让TGD人群参与研究的设计和实施,以确保相关性和有效性。