Loria Matthew, Tabernacki Tomasz, Fraiman Elad, Perez Jaime, Zeki Jessica Abou, Palozzi Julia, Goldblatt Carly, Gupta Shubham, Mishra Kirtishri, McNamara Megan, Banik Swagata
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, USA.
University Hospital's Urology Institute, Lyndhurst, USA.
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Dec 31;4(1):283. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00704-7.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the risk of being diagnosed with an eating disorder among transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals, specifically examining how this risk differs following gender-affirming medical therapy (GAMT).
The study utilizes electronic medical record (EMR) data from the TriNetX database. A total of 90,955 TGD individuals were identified in the TriNetX database. TGD individuals were divided into cohorts according to gender-affirming interventions they received. To assess the risk of eating disorder diagnoses across groups, we applied a Cox proportional hazards model with gender-affirming care as a time-varying covariate.
Here we show that transfeminine individuals receiving hormone therapy (HT) have a significantly higher likelihood of being diagnosed with an eating disorder compared to those without intervention (HR:1.67, 95% CI:1.41, 1.98). Conversely, transmasculine individuals on HT exhibit a reduced risk of being diagnosed with an eating disorder relative to those without intervention (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.90).
After undergoing gender-affirming medical therapy, the risk of eating disorder diagnosis increases for transfeminine individuals and decreases for transmasculine individuals. The observed differences in risk between transfeminine and transmasculine individuals on GAMT may be attributed to factors such as gendered societal norms, variations in screening practices, and the physiological effects of hormone therapy on eating disorder symptomatology. Further research is needed to clarify these influences and support tailored interventions.
本研究的目的是评估跨性别者和性别多样化(TGD)个体被诊断患有饮食失调症的风险,特别研究在接受性别肯定性医学治疗(GAMT)后这种风险如何不同。
该研究利用了来自TriNetX数据库的电子病历(EMR)数据。在TriNetX数据库中总共识别出90,955名TGD个体。TGD个体根据他们接受的性别肯定性干预措施被分为不同队列。为了评估各组饮食失调症诊断的风险,我们应用了一个Cox比例风险模型,将性别肯定性护理作为一个随时间变化的协变量。
我们在此表明,接受激素治疗(HT)的女性化跨性别者被诊断患有饮食失调症的可能性明显高于未接受干预的人(风险比:1.67,95%置信区间:1.41,1.98)。相反,接受HT的男性化跨性别者被诊断患有饮食失调症的风险相对于未接受干预的人有所降低(风险比:0.83,95%置信区间:0.76,0.90)。
在接受性别肯定性医学治疗后,女性化跨性别者饮食失调症诊断的风险增加,而男性化跨性别者的风险降低。在接受GAMT的女性化和男性化跨性别者之间观察到的风险差异可能归因于诸如性别化的社会规范、筛查实践的差异以及激素治疗对饮食失调症状的生理影响等因素。需要进一步的研究来阐明这些影响并支持针对性的干预措施。