Zúñiga-Ramírez Carlos, Farías-Moreno Katia Carmina, Moreno Gabriel, Gómez-Figueroa Enrique, Caicedo-Ortíz Hernando Efraín, Carrillo-Ruíz José Damián
Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde", Unidad de Movimientos Anormales y Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Guadalajara, Mexico.
University of Central Florida-Hospital Corporation of America Florida Healthcare, Department of Neurology, Orlando FL, United States.
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2025 Jul;83(7):1-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1809996. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. Levodopa has been considered the best treatment option. However, deep brain stimulation (DBS) use has increased over time, mostly when levodopa-related complications arise.To review the current evidence regarding economic evaluations assessing costs and benefits comparing pharmacological versus surgical treatment among subjects with PD.We searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar) for studies comparing levodopa treatment and DBS among subjects with PD in terms of costs and benefits from therapy.Out of the 107 studies identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the published studies were from Europe. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios have shown variable results, from -€979 to €6,729 per change of 1 point in the score on part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III), while incremental cost-utility ratios depict values as low as €6,700 and as high as $704,906.03 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY).We observed a higher cost during the 1 year of DBS implantation due to the surgical procedure itself, subsequently, there was a trend for a lower cost over the following years, with no loss of benefit. Overall, the studies showed DBS as a cost-effective measure at 5-years after implantation.
帕金森病(PD)是全球第二常见的神经退行性疾病。左旋多巴一直被认为是最佳治疗选择。然而,随着时间的推移,深部脑刺激(DBS)的使用有所增加,主要是在出现左旋多巴相关并发症时。为了回顾当前关于经济评估的证据,这些评估比较了帕金森病患者药物治疗与手术治疗的成本和效益。我们在三个数据库(PubMed、Embase和谷歌学术)中搜索了比较帕金森病患者左旋多巴治疗和DBS治疗成本和效益的研究。在确定的107项研究中,14项符合纳入标准。大多数已发表的研究来自欧洲。增量成本效益比显示出不同的结果,每增加1分统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS III)第三部分得分,增量成本效益比从-979欧元到6729欧元不等,而增量成本效用比则显示每质量调整生命年(QALY)的价值低至6700欧元,高至704906.03美元。我们观察到,由于手术本身,DBS植入的第1年成本较高,随后,在接下来的几年中成本有下降趋势,且效益未损失。总体而言,研究表明DBS在植入后5年是一种具有成本效益的措施。