Mahlberg Moritz, Dorst Johannes, Elmas Zeynep, Haase Ulrike, Heming Michael, Müller-Miny Louisa, Meyer Zu Hörste Gerd, Stettner Mark, Then Bergh Florian, Baum Petra
Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
BMC Neurol. 2025 Jul 17;25(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04294-2.
There is limited study data on both therapeutic plasma exchange (PE) and immunoadsorption (IA) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), mostly based on case series in patients in the early stages of the disease. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the two therapy procedures in a larger sample with a longer duration of disease and immunomodulatory pre-treatment.
In this retrospective study from 5 centers in Germany, register data on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of therapy with IA or PE in patients with CIDP were examined. Treatment response was assessed using neurological scores (INCAT and Hughes Score), duration of hospital stay, and subjective assessment by examiners and patients. In addition, side effects were recorded.
A total of 44 patients were analyzed, 23 treated with PE (mean age 61.3 years, 17 male, 6 female) and 21 with IA (mean age 67, 14 male, 7 female). The mean duration of disease before treatment was 8.48±3.82 years (PE group) and 7.24±3.15 years (IA group). IA and PE showed a comparable treatment response. With IA, 11 out of 21 (52.4%) patients improved, whereas with PE, 14 out of 23 (60.9%) patients improved. The differences between before- and after-treatment INCAT and Hughes scores also showed an improvement with both PE and IA individually (INCAT 1.17±1.61 and 0.71±1.65, respectively, Hughes score 0.48±0.73 and 0.33±0.66, respectively), while there were no significant differences between the two groups. The patients in the IA group had a significantly shorter inpatient stay ( < 0.019). There was one adverse event in each group, but no serious adverse events in either group.
This retrospective study indicates that IA and PE show comparable efficacy in chronic autoimmune neuropathies, including patients with longer disease duration and immunomodulatory pretreatment.
关于治疗性血浆置换(PE)和免疫吸附(IA)在慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(CIDP)中的研究数据有限,大多基于疾病早期患者的病例系列。这项回顾性研究的目的是在更大样本、疾病持续时间更长且有免疫调节预处理的情况下,比较这两种治疗方法的疗效和耐受性。
在这项来自德国5个中心的回顾性研究中,检查了CIDP患者接受IA或PE治疗的疗效、安全性和耐受性的登记数据。使用神经学评分(INCAT和休斯评分)、住院时间以及检查者和患者的主观评估来评估治疗反应。此外,记录副作用。
共分析了44例患者,23例接受PE治疗(平均年龄61.3岁,男性17例,女性6例),21例接受IA治疗(平均年龄67岁,男性14例,女性7例)。治疗前疾病的平均持续时间为8.48±3.82年(PE组)和7.24±3.15年(IA组)。IA和PE显示出相当的治疗反应。IA治疗的21例患者中有11例(52.4%)改善,而PE治疗的23例患者中有14例(60.9%)改善。治疗前后INCAT和休斯评分的差异也显示PE和IA各自都有改善(INCAT分别为1.17±1.61和0.71±1.65,休斯评分分别为0.48±0.73和0.33±0.66),而两组之间无显著差异。IA组患者的住院时间明显更短(<0.019)。每组各有1例不良事件,但两组均无严重不良事件。
这项回顾性研究表明,IA和PE在慢性自身免疫性神经病中显示出相当的疗效,包括疾病持续时间较长且有免疫调节预处理的患者。