Suppr超能文献

免疫疗法联合放射疗法治疗肺癌:治疗效果、安全性考量及远隔效应的荟萃分析

Immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer: a meta-analysis of therapeutic effectiveness, safety considerations, and abscopal effect.

作者信息

Gao Min, Su Mingxuan, Wang Jinyuan, Wang Rutong, Yi Jiawei, Xiang Keming, Deng Renhe, Jiang Linxi, Zeng Yu, He Junhui, Lv Yuqiang

机构信息

Pediatric Research Institute, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University (Jinan Children's Hospital), Jinan, Shandong, 250022, China.

Clinical Anatomy & Reproductive Medicine Application Institute, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, 421001, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 17;25(1):1184. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14542-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

With the escalating global incidence and mortality of lung cancer, immunotherapy has achieved modest success while facing persistent challenges. The immunomodulatory effect of radiotherapy has gradually gained attention, especially the abscopal effect observed in the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Although mechanistically controversial, its clinical significance in lung cancer treatment is noteworthy. Therefore, this study aims to delve into the therapeutic differences between immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) combined with radiotherapy (RT) and traditional immunotherapy alone, aiming to provide scientific evidence for optimizing lung cancer treatment strategies, improving patient outcomes, and enhancing survival rates.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to 26 March 2024. Heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, forest plots, clipping plots, and publication bias were analysed using RevMan5.4 and Stata 12.0.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 19 articles, encompassing 5109 lung cancer patients in the ICI + RT group and 4686 patients in the ICI group. Meta-analysis revealed that the progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.68, 95%CI [0.62-0.75], p < 0.00001) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.70, 95%CI [0.62-0.79], p < 0.00001) of lung cancer patients in the ICI + RT treatment group were longer than those in the ICI treatment group, and ICI + RT or ICI treatment for lung cancer patients did not affect adverse events (OR = 1.09, 95%CI [0.80-1.50], p > 0.05) or death (HR = 1.03, 95%CI [0.30-3.57], p < 0.05).The subgroup analysis showed that within the PFS group, RCT (HR = 0.73, 95%CI [0.62-0.85], p < 0.00001), Non-RCT (HR = 0.61, 95%CI [0.49-0.76], p < 0.00001), Nivolumab (HR = 0.57, 95%CI [0.46-0.71], p < 0.00001), Pembrolizumab (HR = 0.67, 95%CI [0.57-0.80], p < 0.00001), stating ICI or during ICI (HR = 0.69, 95%CI [0.61-0.79], p < 0.00001), during ICI (HR = 0.70, 95%CI [0.58-0.85], p < 0.001), squamous (HR = 0.57, 95%CI [0.41-0.79], p < 0.001), Non-squamous (HR = 0.63, 95%CI [0.47-0.83], p < 0.001), smoking (HR = 0.46, 95%CI [0.39-0.95], p < 0.05), no smoking or smoking history (HR = 0.73, 95%CI [0.63-0.92], p < 0.01), ECOG = 0 (HR = 0.53, 95%CI [0.37-0.75], p < 0.01), ECOG > = 1 (HR = 0.61, 95%CI [0.45-0.83], p < 0.01) were significant, male (HR = 0.56, 95%CI [0.44-0.70], p < 0.0001), female (HR = 0.74, 95%CI [0.52-1.05], p > 0.05) were only significant in males, PD-1 high expression (HR = 0.92, 95%CI [0.48-1.78], p > 0.05), PD-1 low expression (HR = 0.61, 95%CI [0.40-0.92], p < 0.05) were significant only in PD-1 low expression; within the OS group, RCT (HR = 0.65, 95%CI [0.55-0.76], p < 0.00001), Non-RCT (HR = 0.77, 95%CI [0.65-0.91], p < 0.01), Nivolumab (HR = 0.73, 95%CI [0.54-0.99], p < 0.05), Pembrolizumab (HR = 0.64, 95%CI [0.55-0.75], p < 0.00001), stating ICI or during ICI (HR = 0.74, 95%CI [0.64-0.86], p < 0.00001), during ICI (HR = 0.65, 95%CI [0.52-0.82], p < 0.001), Smoking (HR = 0.61, 95%CI [0.28-0.75], p < 0.01), No smoking or smoking history (HR = 0.76, 95%CI [0.62-0.86], p < 0.001) were significant, male (HR = 0.59, 95%CI [0.44-0.78], p < 0.0001), female (HR = 1.01, 95%CI [0.68-1.48], p > 0.05) were only significant in males, PD-1 high expression (HR = 0.53, 95%CI [0.22-1.26], p > 0.05), PD-1 low expression (HR = 0.60, 95%CI [0.39-0.94], p < 0.05) were significant only in PD-1 low expression, ECOG = 0 (HR = 0.51, 95%CI [0.31-0.82], p < 0.01), ECOG > = 1 (HR = 0.80, 95%CI [0.52-1.23], p > 0.05) were significant only in ECOG = 0.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that the combination of ICI and RT significantly prolongs the Progression-Free-Survival and Overall Survival of lung cancer patients compared to the use of ICI alone, demonstrating a certain therapeutic advantage across different subgroups. This finding provides robust evidence supporting the widespread adoption of ICI+RT combination therapy for lung cancer, potentially leading to more effective treatment strategies, improved patient outcomes, and higher survival rates.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD42024544343.

摘要

背景与目的

随着全球肺癌发病率和死亡率的不断攀升,免疫疗法虽取得一定成效,但仍面临诸多挑战。放疗的免疫调节作用逐渐受到关注,尤其是放疗与免疫疗法联合时出现的远隔效应。尽管其作用机制存在争议,但其在肺癌治疗中的临床意义值得关注。因此,本研究旨在深入探讨免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合放疗(RT)的免疫疗法与传统单纯免疫疗法在治疗上的差异,为优化肺癌治疗策略、改善患者预后及提高生存率提供科学依据。

方法

截至2024年3月26日,在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆进行文献检索。使用RevMan5.4和Stata 12.0分析异质性、敏感性分析、森林图、剪报图和发表偏倚。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入19篇文章,ICI + RT组包含5109例肺癌患者,ICI组包含4686例患者。荟萃分析显示,ICI + RT治疗组肺癌患者的无进展生存期(PFS)(HR = 0.68,95%CI [0.62 - 0.75],p < 0.00001)和总生存期(OS)(HR = 0.70,95%CI [0.62 - 0.79],p < 0.00001)长于ICI治疗组,且ICI + RT或ICI治疗肺癌患者对不良事件(OR = 1.09,95%CI [0.80 - 1.50],p > 0.05)或死亡(HR = 1.03,95%CI [0.30 - 3.57],p < 0.05)无影响。亚组分析表明,在PFS组中,随机对照试验(RCT)(HR = 0.73,95%CI [0.62 - 0.85],p < 0.00001)、非随机对照试验(Non - RCT)(HR = 0.61,95%CI [0.49 - 0.76],p < 0.00001)、纳武单抗(HR = 0.57,95%CI [0.46 - 0.71],p < 0.00001)、帕博利珠单抗(HR = 0.67,95%CI [0.57 - 0.80],p < 0.00001)、开始ICI时或ICI期间(HR = 0.69,95%CI [0.61 - 0.79],p < 0.00001)、ICI期间(HR = 0.70,95%CI [0.58 - 0.85],p < 0.001)、鳞状细胞癌(HR = 0.57,95%CI [0.41 - 0.79],p < 0.001)、非鳞状细胞癌(HR = 0.63,95%CI [0.47 - 0.83],p < 0.001)、吸烟(HR = 0.46,95%CI [0.39 - 0.95],p < 0.05)、不吸烟或有吸烟史(HR = 0.73,95%CI [0.63 - 0.92],p < 0.01)、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分为0(HR = 0.53,95%CI [0.37 - 0.75],p < 0.01)、ECOG≥1(HR = 0.61,95%CI [0.45 - 0.83],p < 0.01)均有显著差异,男性(HR = 0.56,95%CI [0.44 - 0.70],p < 0.0001)、女性(HR = 0.74,95%CI [0.52 - 1.05],p > 0.05)仅在男性中有显著差异,程序性死亡受体1(PD - 1)高表达(HR = 0.92,95%CI [0.48 - 1.78],p > 0.05)、PD - 1低表达(HR = 0.61,95%CI [0.40 - 0.92],p < 0.05)仅在PD - 1低表达时有显著差异;在OS组中,RCT(HR = 0.65,95%CI [0.55 - 0.76],p < 0.00001)、Non - RCT(HR = 0.77,95%CI [0.65 - 0.91],p < 0.01)、纳武单抗(HR = 0.73,95%CI [0.54 - 0.99],p < 0.05)、帕博利珠单抗(HR = 0.64,95%CI [0.55 - 0.75],p < 0.00001)、开始ICI时或ICI期间(HR = 0.74,95%CI [0.64 - 0.86],p < 0.00001)、ICI期间(HR = 0.65,95%CI [0.52 - 0.82],p < 0.001)、吸烟(HR = 0.61,95%CI [0.28 - 0.75],p < 0.01)、不吸烟或有吸烟史(HR = 0.76,95%CI [0.62 - 0.86],p < 0.001)均有显著差异,男性(HR = 0.59,95%CI [0.44 - 0.78],p < 0.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验