Suppr超能文献

基于人工智能的面部分析与自我报告:一项利用术前心理测试见解的初步研究。

AI-Based Facial Analysis vs Self-Report: A Pilot Study Using Insights From Pre-Procedural Psychological Tests.

作者信息

Mamcarz Izabela, Podleśna Marcelina, Bis Emanuela, Białek Aleksandra, Curzytek Kacper, Guz Andrzej, Wilhelm Klaudia, Majewski Marek, Torres Kamil, Surowiecka Agnieszka

机构信息

Simulation Laboratory for Patient Safety, Chair of Medical Simulation, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Student Scientific Club of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jul 18;31:e947227. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947227.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Aesthetic procedures aligning with societal beauty standards are gaining popularity, often driven by unrealistic beauty ideals. However, these treatments frequently disappoint individuals with low self-esteem and distorted self-images. AI tools offer potential for a more objective assessment, generating pre-treatment simulations. This study explores the relationship between psychological profiles and AI evaluations. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-seven participants underwent psychological tests (TIPI-PL, SWLS, Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale, and Self-Perception Scale). An AI neural network analyzed facial images across 7 traits: attractiveness, competence, restfulness, joy, dominance, health, and trustworthiness. The AI application dedicated to tablets that we used is available online. After taking a photo of the face, the application creates a heatmap with facial features pictured on the scale. Participants also self-assessed these traits using the SPS scale. Pearson's r and the Mann-Whitney U tests were used to examine correlations and compare AI and self-assessment results. RESULTS The AI-based analysis assessed female faces as more attractive (P<0.001), more rested (P=0.004), happier (P<0.001) and more trustworthy (P<0.001). There was a significant association trending towards statistical significance between 'Competent' and 'Rested' AI results with TIPI Extraversion (P=0.045). None of the other results of the analysis of psychological status, personality types, self-esteem, and well-being reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS AI applications present promising opportunities for enhancing medical practices. In this study we observed some limitations, especially concerning the intricate interplay between physical appearance, psychological factors, and AI facial evaluation. The SPS scale was significantly correlated with other psychological tests, although AI ratings were generally lower than self-assessments. Therefore, AI should not be the only tool used for planning aesthetic procedures.

摘要

背景 符合社会审美标准的美容手术越来越受欢迎,这通常是由不切实际的美容理想所驱动。然而,这些治疗常常让自尊心低和自我形象扭曲的人失望。人工智能工具为更客观的评估提供了潜力,可生成治疗前模拟。本研究探讨心理特征与人工智能评估之间的关系。

材料与方法 47名参与者接受了心理测试(TIPI-PL、SWLS、罗森伯格自尊量表和自我感知量表)。一个人工智能神经网络分析了面部图像的7个特征:吸引力、能力、宁静感、愉悦感、支配力、健康和可信度。我们使用的专门用于平板电脑的人工智能应用程序可在线获取。拍摄面部照片后,该应用程序会创建一个带有按比例描绘面部特征的热图。参与者还使用SPS量表对这些特征进行自我评估。使用皮尔逊r检验和曼-惠特尼U检验来检验相关性并比较人工智能和自我评估结果。

结果 基于人工智能的分析将女性面部评估为更具吸引力(P<0.001)、更显宁静(P=0.004)、更快乐(P<0.001)和更值得信赖(P<0.001)。人工智能“有能力”和“显宁静”的结果与TIPI外向性之间存在显著关联且有统计学意义的趋势(P=0.045)。心理状态、性格类型、自尊和幸福感分析的其他结果均未达到统计学意义。

结论 人工智能应用为改善医疗实践提供了有前景的机会。在本研究中,我们观察到了一些局限性,特别是关于外貌、心理因素和人工智能面部评估之间复杂的相互作用。SPS量表与其他心理测试显著相关,尽管人工智能评分通常低于自我评估。因此,人工智能不应是规划美容手术时唯一使用的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验