Suppr超能文献

即时医疗临床试验中知情同意实践与挑战的概况

Landscape of informed consent practices and challenges in point-of-care clinical trials.

作者信息

Propes Caleigh, Locke Trevan, Hendricks-Sturrup Rachele

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Berman Institute of Bioethics Baltimore Maryland USA.

Duke-Robert J. Margolis, MD, Institute for Health Policy, Duke University Washington DC USA.

出版信息

Learn Health Syst. 2025 Mar 3;9(3):e10467. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10467. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Point-of-care trials, an approach to trial design that assesses medical product effectiveness while fully integrating research and care, represent a promising opportunity to generate practically relevant evidence efficiently for priority disease areas. However, this approach presents unique considerations for appropriate and ethical informed consent. As point-of-care trials evolve, it will be important to examine informed consent through the lens of their supporting technology, of the clinicians who are responsible for administering it, and of their broader regulatory environment. Steps should be taken to establish ethical standards for point-of-care trials that reflect and serve the best interests of patients while reducing administrative burden and complexity. Our commentary describes, overall and through the use of real-world examples, how this work is vital to ensuring a modern clinical trial enterprise that is patient-centered and equips patients to make fully informed decisions about their health care.

摘要

即时护理试验是一种试验设计方法,在充分整合研究与护理的同时评估医疗产品的有效性,为重点疾病领域高效生成具有实际相关性的证据提供了一个充满希望的机会。然而,这种方法在适当和符合伦理的知情同意方面存在独特的考量。随着即时护理试验的发展,从其支持技术、负责实施知情同意的临床医生以及更广泛的监管环境等角度审视知情同意将变得至关重要。应采取措施为即时护理试验建立伦理标准,既要反映并服务于患者的最佳利益,又要减轻行政负担和复杂性。我们的评论通过整体阐述并结合实际案例,说明了这项工作对于确保以患者为中心的现代临床试验体系至关重要,该体系能使患者有能力就自身医疗保健做出充分知情的决策。

相似文献

1
Landscape of informed consent practices and challenges in point-of-care clinical trials.
Learn Health Syst. 2025 Mar 3;9(3):e10467. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10467. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
5
The health economics of insulin therapy: How do we address the rising demands, costs, inequalities and barriers to achieving optimal outcomes.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul;27 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):24-35. doi: 10.1111/dom.16488. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
6
Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 6;2013(7):CD009445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009445.pub2.
8
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Recurring and Emerging Ethical Issues in Pragmatic Clinical Trials.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jul;17(7):e010847. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.010847. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
2
Patient and public involvement in pragmatic trials: online survey of corresponding authors of published trials.
CMAJ Open. 2023 Sep 19;11(5):E826-E837. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220198. Print 2023 Sep-Oct.
3
Now is the time to fix the evidence generation system.
Clin Trials. 2023 Feb;20(1):3-12. doi: 10.1177/17407745221147689. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
4
Toward Meeting the Obligation of Respect for Persons in Pragmatic Clinical Trials.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 May;52(3):9-17. doi: 10.1002/hast.1391.
5
Practical steps to identifying the research risk of pragmatic trials.
Clin Trials. 2022 Apr;19(2):211-216. doi: 10.1177/17407745211063476. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
7
Trends in COVID-19 therapeutic clinical trials.
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021 Apr;20(4):254-255. doi: 10.1038/d41573-021-00037-3.
8
Patient accrual and understanding of informed consent in a two-stage consent design.
Clin Trials. 2021 Jun;18(3):377-382. doi: 10.1177/1740774520988500. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
10
Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research.
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):523-539. doi: 10.1111/hex.13040. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验