• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Patients prefer artificial intelligence large language model-generated responses to those prepared by the American College of Mohs Surgery: A double-blind comparative study using ChatGPT and Google Gemini.

作者信息

Robinson Michelle A, Belzberg Micah, Cai Connie, Lim Jordan, Liu T Y Alvin, Ng Elise

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

JAAD Int. 2025 May 29;21:52-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2025.04.005. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.jdin.2025.04.005
PMID:40677733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12269631/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Patients prefer artificial intelligence large language model-generated responses to those prepared by the American College of Mohs Surgery: A double-blind comparative study using ChatGPT and Google Gemini.与美国莫氏外科学会准备的回复相比，患者更喜欢人工智能大语言模型生成的回复：一项使用ChatGPT和谷歌Gemini的双盲对比研究。
JAAD Int. 2025 May 29;21:52-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2025.04.005. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Performance of 3 Conversational Generative Artificial Intelligence Models for Computing Maximum Safe Doses of Local Anesthetics: Comparative Analysis.用于计算局部麻醉药最大安全剂量的3种对话式生成人工智能模型的性能：比较分析
JMIR AI. 2025 May 13;4:e66796. doi: 10.2196/66796.
3
Artificial Intelligence in Peripheral Artery Disease Education: A Battle Between ChatGPT and Google Gemini.外周动脉疾病教育中的人工智能：ChatGPT与谷歌Gemini的较量
Cureus. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e85174. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85174. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Can artificial intelligence improve the readability of patient education information in gynecology?人工智能能否提高妇科患者教育信息的可读性？
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.06.047.
5
Benchmarking the performance of large language models in uveitis: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, Google Gemini, and Anthropic Claude3.葡萄膜炎中大型语言模型性能的基准测试：ChatGPT-3.5、ChatGPT-4.0、谷歌Gemini和Anthropic Claude3的比较分析
Eye (Lond). 2025 Apr;39(6):1132-1137. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03545-9. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
6
Accuracy and Reliability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots as Public Information Sources in Implant Dentistry.人工智能聊天机器人作为种植牙科公共信息来源的准确性和可靠性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2025 Jun 25;0(0):1-23. doi: 10.11607/jomi.11280.
7
Development and Validation of a Large Language Model-Powered Chatbot for Neurosurgery: Mixed Methods Study on Enhancing Perioperative Patient Education.用于神经外科手术的基于大语言模型的聊天机器人的开发与验证：关于加强围手术期患者教育的混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 15;27:e74299. doi: 10.2196/74299.
8
Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4o, Copilot, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity in advising on lumbosacral radicular pain against clinical practice guidelines: cross-sectional study.ChatGPT-3.5、ChatGPT-4o、Copilot、Gemini、Claude和Perplexity在依据临床实践指南对腰骶神经根性疼痛提供建议方面的准确性：横断面研究
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 27;7:1574287. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1574287. eCollection 2025.
9
A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Patient Information Guides Generated by ChatGPT Versus Google Gemini for Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinsonism, and Migraine.ChatGPT与谷歌Gemini生成的针对阿尔茨海默病、帕金森症和偏头痛的患者信息指南的横断面比较
Cureus. 2025 May 20;17(5):e84507. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84507. eCollection 2025 May.
10
The Role of Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models in Literature Search Assistance to Evaluate Inguinal Hernia Repair Approaches.人工智能大语言模型在腹股沟疝修补方法评估的文献检索辅助中的作用
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2025 Jun;35(6):437-444. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0277. Epub 2025 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Both Patients and Plastic Surgeons Prefer Artificial Intelligence-Generated Microsurgical Information.患者和整形外科医生都更喜欢人工智能生成的显微手术信息。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2024 Nov;40(9):657-664. doi: 10.1055/a-2273-4163. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
2
Assessing the accuracy, usefulness, and readability of artificial-intelligence-generated responses to common dermatologic surgery questions for patient education: A double-blinded comparative study of ChatGPT and Google Bard.评估人工智能生成的针对常见皮肤科手术问题的患者教育回复的准确性、实用性和可读性：ChatGPT与谷歌巴德的双盲比较研究
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 May;90(5):1078-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.01.037. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Doctor Versus Artificial Intelligence: Patient and Physician Evaluation of Large Language Model Responses to Rheumatology Patient Questions in a Cross-Sectional Study.医生与人工智能的较量：横断面研究中对大语言模型回答风湿病患者问题的患者和医生评估。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024 Mar;76(3):479-484. doi: 10.1002/art.42737. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
4
Readability of Patient Education Materials From High-Impact Medical Journals: A 20-Year Analysis.高影响力医学期刊中患者教育材料的可读性：一项为期20年的分析。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Mar 3;8:2374373521998847. doi: 10.1177/2374373521998847. eCollection 2021.
5
A Chatbot Versus Physicians to Provide Information for Patients With Breast Cancer: Blind, Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial.聊天机器人与医生为乳腺癌患者提供信息的比较：盲法、随机对照非劣效性试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 27;21(11):e15787. doi: 10.2196/15787.