• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙心血管多效药丸策略与标准治疗用于二级心血管预防的成本效益:基于SECURE试验的分析

Cost-effectiveness of the CV-polypill strategy versus standard care for secondary cardiovascular prevention in Spain: an analysis based on the SECURE trial.

作者信息

Gaziano Thomas, Castellano José María, Dymond Amy, Looby Alissa, Mealing Stuart, Owen Ruth, Pocock Stuart, González-Juanatey José Ramón, Cordero Alberto, Fernández-Ortiz Antonio, Linhart Aleš, Schiele François, Doehner Wolfram, Fernández Luisa Ojeda, Fuster Valentín

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Jun 27;55:101348. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101348. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101348
PMID:40678039
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12269512/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The SECURE trial (NCT02596126) demonstrated the efficacy of the cardiovascular polypill ("CV-Polypill"-acetyl salicylic acid, atorvastatin and ramipril) in reducing the risk of recurrent major cardiovascular events compared with standard care when initiated within six months of a myocardial infarction. This analysis aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the CV-Polypill from the Spanish healthcare perspective using SECURE trial data.

METHODS

A decision analytic Markov modelling approach was conducted to compare the CV-Polypill with standard care over a lifetime time horizon. Six parametric distributions were fitted to SECURE trial data on time to reinfarction, stroke or death (cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular). Cost and utility data were sourced from literature. Respective model outputs were discounted at 3%. The model captured direct medical costs associated with treatment acquisition and acute/ongoing cardiovascular events. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) and scenario analyses were conducted.

FINDINGS

The CV-Polypill is dominant (improves health outcomes and reduces costs) in 84·8% of PSA iterations (848/1000 iterations), and cost effective in 89·3% of PSA iterations (893/1000 iterations) at a €30,000 threshold. Secondary prevention with the CV-Polypill reduces the recurrence of cardiovascular events and costs over the time horizon, from the Spanish healthcare perspective. A range of scenario analyses were conducted, demonstrating the robustness of the results when different inputs and assumptions were varied.

INTERPRETATION

The CV-Polypill is a dominant strategy in secondary cardiovascular prevention, compared with standard care, from the Spanish healthcare perspective. The CV-Polypill should be considered as a secondary prevention for Spanish patients, like those enrolled in SECURE, at hospital discharge.

FUNDING

By Ferrer International.

摘要

背景

SECURE试验(NCT02596126)表明,在心肌梗死后六个月内开始使用心血管复方制剂(“CV - 复方制剂”——乙酰水杨酸、阿托伐他汀和雷米普利)与标准治疗相比,可降低复发性重大心血管事件的风险。本分析旨在利用SECURE试验数据,从西班牙医疗保健的角度评估CV - 复方制剂的成本效益。

方法

采用决策分析马尔可夫建模方法,在终身时间范围内比较CV - 复方制剂与标准治疗。对SECURE试验中再梗死、中风或死亡(心血管或非心血管)时间的数据拟合了六种参数分布。成本和效用数据来自文献。各模型输出按3%进行贴现。该模型涵盖了与治疗获取以及急性/持续性心血管事件相关的直接医疗成本。进行了概率敏感性分析(PSA)和情景分析。

结果

在30000欧元的阈值下,CV - 复方制剂在84.8%的PSA迭代(848/1000次迭代)中占主导地位(改善健康结果并降低成本),在89.3%的PSA迭代(893/1000次迭代)中具有成本效益。从西班牙医疗保健的角度来看,使用CV - 复方制剂进行二级预防可在该时间范围内降低心血管事件的复发率和成本。进行了一系列情景分析,表明当不同的输入和假设发生变化时,结果具有稳健性。

解读

从西班牙医疗保健的角度来看,与标准治疗相比,CV - 复方制剂在心血管二级预防中是一种占主导地位的策略。对于西班牙患者,如参加SECURE试验的患者,出院时应考虑将CV - 复方制剂作为二级预防措施。

资金来源

由费雷尔国际公司提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/481d/12269512/3e6c8a3c1d29/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/481d/12269512/793fc1874fa3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/481d/12269512/3e6c8a3c1d29/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/481d/12269512/793fc1874fa3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/481d/12269512/3e6c8a3c1d29/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of the CV-polypill strategy versus standard care for secondary cardiovascular prevention in Spain: an analysis based on the SECURE trial.西班牙心血管多效药丸策略与标准治疗用于二级心血管预防的成本效益:基于SECURE试验的分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Jun 27;55:101348. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101348. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
3
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
4
A systematic review and economic evaluation of statins for the prevention of coronary events.他汀类药物预防冠状动脉事件的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Apr;11(14):1-160, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11140.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
A systematic review and economic evaluation of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of aldosterone antagonists for postmyocardial infarction heart failure.心肌梗死后心力衰竭中醛固酮拮抗剂的临床疗效和成本效果的系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(24):1-162. doi: 10.3310/hta14240.
7
Etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗银屑病关节炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(31):iii-iv, xiii-xvi, 1-239. doi: 10.3310/hta10310.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗(双心室起搏)用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益:系统评价与经济学模型
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.
9
Automated devices for identifying peripheral arterial disease in people with leg ulceration: an evidence synthesis and cost-effectiveness analysis.用于识别下肢溃疡患者外周动脉疾病的自动化设备:证据综合和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(37):1-158. doi: 10.3310/TWCG3912.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

1
Secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: is it time for the polypill to be standard treatment?心血管疾病的二级预防:复方制剂成为标准治疗的时机到了吗?
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Jul 12;55:101384. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101384. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of statin therapy on diagnoses of new-onset diabetes and worsening glycaemia in large-scale randomised blinded statin trials: an individual participant data meta-analysis.他汀类药物治疗对大规模随机双盲他汀试验中新发糖尿病诊断及血糖恶化的影响:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024 May;12(5):306-319. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00040-8. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
2
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
3
Cost-effectiveness of the CNIC-Polypill versus separate monocomponents in cardiovascular secondary prevention in Spain.
西班牙心血管二级预防中,CNIC 复方与单一成分药物的成本效益比较。
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2023 Aug-Sep;223(7):414-422. doi: 10.1016/j.rceng.2023.06.007. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
4
2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension: Endorsed by the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the European Renal Association (ERA).2023ESH 动脉高血压管理指南 欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理工作组:得到国际高血压学会 (ISH) 和欧洲肾脏协会 (ERA) 的认可。
J Hypertens. 2023 Dec 1;41(12):1874-2071. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003480. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of the CNIC-Polypill Strategy Compared With Separate Monocomponents in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease in Portugal: The MERCURY Study.在葡萄牙心血管和脑血管疾病二级预防中,与单一成分药物分别使用相比,CNIC复方药丸策略的成本效益:MERCURY研究
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2022 Nov 22;9(2):134-146. doi: 10.36469/001c.39768. eCollection 2022.
6
How to optimize the adherence to a guideline-directed medical therapy in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases: a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Preventive Cardiology.如何优化心血管疾病二级预防中指南导向的药物治疗依从性:欧洲预防心脏病学协会的临床共识声明。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Jan 24;30(2):149-166. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwac204.
7
Polypill Strategy in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention.复方药治疗在二级心血管预防中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 15;387(11):967-977. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2208275. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
8
The CNIC-Polypill reduces recurrent major cardiovascular events in real-life secondary prevention patients in Spain: The NEPTUNO study.CNIC-复方药在西班牙真实二级预防患者中降低复发性主要心血管事件:NEPTUNO 研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Aug 15;361:116-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.05.015. Epub 2022 May 13.
9
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.2021年欧洲心脏病学会临床实践心血管疾病预防指南。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022 Feb 19;29(1):5-115. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab154.
10
Fixed-dose combination therapies with and without aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: an individual participant data meta-analysis.固定剂量联合治疗与不联合阿司匹林用于心血管疾病一级预防的疗效:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2021 Sep 25;398(10306):1133-1146. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01827-4. Epub 2021 Aug 29.