Suppr超能文献

日本人理想的鼻角偏好:一项关于审美认知的前瞻性观察研究。

Ideal Nasal Angle Preferences Among Japanese People: A Prospective Observational Study on Aesthetic Perception.

作者信息

Okumura Kohki, Tamura Takahiko, Funakoshi Yusuke, Teranishi Hiroo

出版信息

Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2025 Jun 24;7:ojaf052. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojaf052. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aesthetic ideal of the nose varies across nationalities and cultures, making it challenging to define an "ideal" nasal shape in rhinoplasty.

OBJECTIVES

The authors of this study aimed to provide foundational data for generalizable aesthetic standards for nasal surgery in Japanese individuals.

METHODS

A randomly selected group of 783 Japanese adults was presented with digitally modified images depicting 12 nasolabial and nasofacial angles. Aesthetic evaluations were conducted using Google Forms or paper surveys. The images were categorized into 3 groups: "aesthetic," "average," and "not aesthetic." Statistical analysis was conducted using JMP software. To minimize bias, the order in which the images were presented was randomized. The Steel-Dwass test was used to assess statistically significant differences between angles.

RESULTS

For men, a nasolabial angle of 95° and a nasofacial angle of 33° were rated as aesthetic, whereas for women, a nasolabial angle of 105° and a nasofacial angle of 30° were considered favorable. The results indicate a preference for sharper nasolabial angles in men and slightly obtuse angles in women. When calculating the ideal angles using the weighted average, the ideal nasolabial angle for men was 105° and the ideal nasofacial angle was 30°. For women, the ideal nasolabial and nasofacial angles were 105° and 30°, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors of this study highlight sex-specific nasal preferences within the Japanese population and emphasize the importance of tailoring rhinoplasty procedures to demographic factors.

摘要

背景

不同国籍和文化对鼻子的审美理想各不相同,这使得在隆鼻手术中定义“理想”鼻型具有挑战性。

目的

本研究的作者旨在为日本人群鼻整形手术的通用美学标准提供基础数据。

方法

向随机选取的783名日本成年人展示描绘12个鼻唇和鼻面角度的数字修改图像。使用谷歌表单或纸质调查问卷进行美学评估。图像分为3组:“美观”、“一般”和“不美观”。使用JMP软件进行统计分析。为尽量减少偏差,图像展示顺序随机化。采用Steel-Dwass检验评估各角度之间的统计学显著差异。

结果

对于男性,鼻唇角95°和鼻面角33°被评为美观,而对于女性,鼻唇角105°和鼻面角30°被认为是理想的。结果表明男性更倾向于更尖锐的鼻唇角,女性则倾向于稍钝的角度。使用加权平均数计算理想角度时,男性的理想鼻唇角为105°,理想鼻面角为30°。对于女性,理想的鼻唇角和鼻面角分别为105°和30°。

结论

本研究的作者强调了日本人群中特定性别的鼻部偏好,并强调了根据人口统计学因素调整隆鼻手术的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ded/12268326/b65f8ea89a72/ojaf052f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Ideal Nasal Angle Preferences Among Japanese People: A Prospective Observational Study on Aesthetic Perception.
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2025 Jun 24;7:ojaf052. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojaf052. eCollection 2025.
2
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
3
Ideal facial relationships and goals - are they still useful in preoperative analysis before rhinoplasty?
Otolaryngol Pol. 2025 Jun 12;79(4):21-28. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0055.1329.
7
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 14;2015(9):CD011045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2.
8
Systemic and topical antibiotics for chronic rhinosinusitis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011994.pub2.
9
Nasal decongestants in monotherapy for the common cold.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 17;10(10):CD009612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009612.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethnic variation in lower face anthropometry on facial computed tomography scans for patients seeking facial feminization surgery.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Jun;93:222-231. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.04.049. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
2
Changes in patient-reported satisfaction and quality-of-life 6 months after rhinoplasty.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Apr;91:325-334. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.038. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
3
Preferred Nasolabial Angle in Rhinoplasty: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Feb 15;44(3):275-285. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad309.
5
Perceptual and Social Attributes Underlining Age-Related Preferences for Faces.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Aug 31;10:437. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00437. eCollection 2016.
6
Nasofacial angle and nasal prominence: A quantitative investigation of idealized and normative values.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Apr;44(4):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
7
A Global Perspective of Beauty in a Multicultural World.
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Jan-Feb;18(1):7-8. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.1563.
8
The ideal nasolabial angle in rhinoplasty: a preference analysis of the general population.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Aug;134(2):201-210. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000385.
9
Redefining the ideal nasolabial angle: Part 2. Expert analysis.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Aug;132(2):221e-225e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182958b40.
10
Defining the ideal nasolabial angle.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar;129(3):759-764. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402e12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验