Hasin Deborah S, Malte Carol, Wall Melanie M, Alschuler Daniel, Simpson Tracy L, Olfson Mark, Livne Ofir, Mannes Zachary L, Fink David S, Keyes Katherine M, Cerdá Magdalena, Maynard Charles C, Keyhani Salomeh, Martins Silvia S, Sherman Scott, Saxon Andrew J
Columbia University Irving Medical Center Department of Psychiatry, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Jun 28;48:101155. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101155. eCollection 2025 Aug.
We investigated whether the associations of state medical and recreational cannabis legalization (MCL, RCL enactment) with increasing prevalence of Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) differed among patients in the United States (US) Veterans Health Administration (VHA) who did or did not have common psychiatric disorders.
Electronic medical record data (2005-2022) were analyzed on patients aged 18-75 with ≥1 VHA primary care, emergency department, or mental health visit and no hospice/palliative care within a given year (sample sizes ranging from 3,234,382 in 2005 to 4,436,883 in 2022). Patients were predominantly male (>80%) and non-Hispanic White (>60%). Utilizing all 18 years of data, CUD prevalence increases attributable to MCL or RCL enactment were estimated among patients with affective, anxiety, psychotic-spectrum disorders, and Any Psychiatric Disorder (APD) using staggered difference-in-difference (DiD) models and 99% Confidence Intervals (CIs), testing differences between patient groups with and without psychiatric disorders via non-overlap in the 99% CIs of their DiD estimates.
Among APD-negative patients, CUD prevalence was <1.0% in all years, while among APD-positive patients, CUD prevalence increased from 3.26% in 2005 to 5.68% in 2022 in no-CL states, from 3.51% to 6.35% in MCL-only states, and from 3.41% to 6.35% in MCL/RCL states. Among the APD group, DiD estimates of MCL-only and MCL/RCL effects were modest-sized, but the lower bound of the 99% CI for the DiD estimate for MCL-only and MCL/RCL effects was larger than the upper bound of the 99% CI among the no-APD group, indicating significantly stronger MCL-only and MCL/RCL effects among patients with APD. Results were similar for MCL-only and MCL/RCL effects among disorder-specific groups (depression, post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD], anxiety or bipolar disorders) and for MCL/RCL effects among patients with psychotic-spectrum disorders.
Cannabis legalization contributed to greater CUD prevalence increases among patients with psychiatric disorders. However, modest-sized DiD estimates suggested operation of other factors, e.g., commercialization, changing attitudes, expectancies. As cannabis legalization widens, recognizing and treating CUD in patients with psychiatric disorders becomes increasingly important.
This study was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse grant R01DA048860, the New York State Psychiatric Institute, and the VA Centers of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education.
我们调查了美国退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)中患有或未患有常见精神疾病的患者,州医用大麻合法化(MCL)和娱乐用大麻合法化(RCL颁布)与大麻使用障碍(CUD)患病率上升之间的关联是否存在差异。
分析了2005年至2022年的电子病历数据,这些数据来自年龄在18至75岁之间、在特定年份内有≥1次VHA初级保健、急诊科或心理健康就诊且无临终关怀/姑息治疗的患者(样本量从2005年的3,234,382例到2022年的4,436,883例)。患者主要为男性(>80%)且非西班牙裔白人(>60%)。利用全部18年的数据,使用交错差分(DiD)模型和99%置信区间(CIs),估计了情感障碍、焦虑症、精神病性谱系障碍和任何精神疾病(APD)患者中因MCL或RCL颁布导致的CUD患病率增加情况,并通过DiD估计值的99%置信区间不重叠来检验有无精神疾病患者组之间的差异。
在无APD的患者中,各年份CUD患病率均<1.0%,而在有APD的患者中,在无CL的州CUD患病率从2005年的3.26%上升至2022年的5.68%,在仅MCL的州从3.51%升至6.35%,在MCL/RCL的州从3.41%升至6.35%。在APD组中,仅MCL和MCL/RCL效应的DiD估计值中等大小,但仅MCL和MCL/RCL效应的DiD估计值的99%置信区间下限大于无APD组99%置信区间的上限,表明仅MCL和MCL/RCL效应在有APD的患者中显著更强。特定疾病组(抑郁症、创伤后应激障碍[PTSD]、焦虑症或双相情感障碍)中仅MCL和MCL/RCL效应以及精神病性谱系障碍患者中MCL/RCL效应的结果相似。
大麻合法化导致精神疾病患者中CUD患病率上升幅度更大。然而中等大小的DiD估计值表明还有其他因素在起作用,例如商业化、态度转变、预期。随着大麻合法化范围扩大,识别和治疗精神疾病患者中的CUD变得越来越重要。
本研究得到了美国国立药物滥用研究所R01DA048860资助、纽约州精神病研究所以及退伍军人事务部物质成瘾治疗与教育卓越中心的支持。