Bruschettini Matteo, Moberg Tilda, O'Donnell Colm Pf, Davis Peter G, Morley Colin J, Moja Lorenzo, Calevo Maria Grazia
Paediatrics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Cochrane Sweden, Department of Research, Development, Education and Innovation, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 18;7(7):CD004953. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004953.pub5.
At birth, infants' lungs are fluid-filled. For newborns to have a successful transition, this fluid must be replaced by air to enable gas exchange. Some infants are judged to have inadequate breathing at birth and are resuscitated with positive pressure ventilation (PPV). Giving a sustained lung inflation (SLI) at the start of PPV may help clear lung fluid and establish gas volume within the lungs. This is a review update; the last version was published in 2020.
To assess the benefits and harms of an initial SLI (> 1 second duration) versus standard inflations (≤ 1 second) in newborn infants receiving resuscitation with intermittent PPV.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and two trial registries on 8 April 2024. We checked the reference lists of studies and other related papers.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing initial SLI versus standard inflations given to infants receiving resuscitation with PPV at birth.
Our critical outcomes were: death in the delivery room; death during hospitalisation. Other clinically relevant outcomes were: rate of mechanical ventilation; chronic lung disease, any grade; chronic lung disease, moderate to severe; pneumothorax during hospitalisation; intraventricular haemorrhage grade 3 or 4.
We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool 1.0.
We conducted meta-analyses using fixed-effect models to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We summarised the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE methods.
Fourteen trials enrolling 1766 infants met our inclusion criteria. The studies were conducted on five continents, and published between 2005 and 2024. Investigators in 12 trials (1722 infants) administered SLI with no chest compressions; 10 studies reported that peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was sustained for 15 seconds. Levels of PIP ranged from 20 to 30 cmH₂O. Investigators in seven studies provided additional SLIs in cases of poor response. We downgraded the overall certainty of evidence for all outcomes because of limitations in study design (e.g. selection bias due to lack of allocation concealment and performance bias due to unblinded intervention), and serious imprecision of results, with wide confidence intervals and few events. One trial is ongoing.
For each outcome, we downgraded the overall certainty of evidence because of limitations in study design and imprecision. Compared with intermittent ventilation, SLI with no chest compression may result in little to no difference in: • death in the delivery room (RR 1.72, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.63; I² = 0%; 6 studies, 639 participants; low-certainty evidence); • death before discharge (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.21; I² = 37%; 12 studies, 1722 participants; low-certainty evidence); • chronic lung disease, any grade (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.18; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 735 participants; low-certainty evidence); • moderate to severe chronic lung disease (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.22; I² = 47%; 6 studies, 727 participants; low-certainty evidence); • pneumothorax during hospitalisation (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.33; I² = 12%; 11 studies, 1641 participants; low-certainty evidence); • intraventricular haemorrhage grade 3-4 (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.38; I² = 13%; 8 studies, 855 participants; low-certainty evidence). SLI with no chest compression may reduce the rate of mechanical ventilation (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.01; I² = 0%; 7 studies, 1174 participants; low-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared with intermittent ventilation, sustained inflation without chest compression may result in little to no difference in death in the delivery room and death before discharge. Sustained inflation may reduce the rate of mechanical ventilation, and may result in little to no difference in chronic lung disease, pneumothorax, and severe intraventricular haemorrhage. There is no evidence to support the use of sustained inflation based on evidence from our review. Future studies of SLI for infants receiving respiratory support at birth should provide more detailed monitoring of the procedure, such as measurements of lung volume and presence of apnoea before or during SLI. Future RCTs should aim to enrol infants who are at higher risk of morbidity and mortality, and should stratify participants by gestational age. Researchers should also measure long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes (e.g. Bayley Scales of Infant Development, administered at two years of corrected age).
This Cochrane Review had no dedicated funding.
Protocol (2004): doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004953 Original review (2015): doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004953.pub2 Review update (2017): doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004953.pub3 Review update (2020): doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004953.pub4.
婴儿出生时,肺部充满液体。为了让新生儿成功过渡,这些液体必须被空气取代,以实现气体交换。一些婴儿在出生时被判定呼吸不足,并接受正压通气(PPV)复苏。在PPV开始时进行持续肺膨胀(SLI)可能有助于清除肺内液体,并在肺内建立气体容量。这是一篇综述更新;上一版于2020年发表。
评估在接受间歇性PPV复苏的新生儿中,初始SLI(持续时间>1秒)与标准通气(持续时间≤1秒)的益处和危害。
我们于2024年4月8日检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、通过PubMed检索MEDLINE、Embase、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)以及两个试验注册库。我们检查了研究及其他相关论文的参考文献列表。
我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)和半随机对照试验,比较初始SLI与出生时接受PPV复苏的婴儿的标准通气。
我们的关键结局为:产房死亡;住院期间死亡。其他临床相关结局为:机械通气率;任何分级慢性肺病;中重度慢性肺病;住院期间气胸;3或4级脑室内出血。
我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具1.0。
我们采用固定效应模型进行Meta分析,以计算风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。我们根据GRADE方法总结证据的确定性。
14项试验共纳入1766名婴儿,符合我们的纳入标准。这些研究在五大洲进行,发表时间为2005年至2024年。12项试验(1722名婴儿)的研究者在不进行胸外按压的情况下实施SLI;10项研究报告称吸气峰压(PIP)持续15秒。PIP水平范围为20至30 cmH₂O。7项研究的研究者在反应不佳的情况下提供额外的SLI。由于研究设计存在局限性(如因缺乏分配隐藏导致的选择偏倚和因干预未设盲导致的实施偏倚)以及结果严重不精确(置信区间宽且事件数少),我们对所有结局的证据总体确定性进行了降级。一项试验正在进行中。
对于每个结局,由于研究设计存在局限性和不精确性,我们对证据的总体确定性进行了降级。与间歇性通气相比,不进行胸外按压的SLI可能在以下方面几乎没有差异或没有差异:• 产房死亡(RR 1.72,95% CI 0.82至3.63;I² = 0%;6项研究,639名参与者;低确定性证据);• 出院前死亡(RR 0.99,95% CI 0.81至1.21;I² = 37%;12项研究,1722名参与者;低确定性证据);• 任何分级慢性肺病(RR 0.99,95% CI 0.83至1.18;I² = 0%;4项研究,735名参与者;低确定性证据);• 中重度慢性肺病(RR 0.95,95% CI 0.74至1.22;I² = 47%;6项研究,727名参与者;低确定性证据);• 住院期间气胸(RR 0.9